HomeMy WebLinkAbout17 124 Bruce Power L.P. Assessment Services Letter of Agreement By-law THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE
KBT
U; e
•
'''447094
70PALIfl OF B\N
BY-LAW
NO. 2017 - 124
BEING A BY-LAW TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH BRUCE POWER
L.P. FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF
KINCARDINE FOR ASSESSMENT SERVICES REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY
OF PROVIDING WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES TO BRUCE
NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001 Section 8 (1) and 9 provide that the powers
• of a municipality under this or any other Act shall be interpreted broadly so as
to confer broad authority on the municipality to enable the municipality to govern
its affairs as it considers appropriate and to enhance the municipality's ability
to respond to municipal issues and has the capacity, rights, powers and
privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under this
or any other Act;
AND WHEREAS it has been determined that there is a need to enter into an
agreement with Bruce Power L.P. for the reimbursement of funds to the
Municipality of Kincardine for assessment services regarding the feasibility of
providing water and wastewater services to Bruce Nuclear Generating Station per
Report PWD 2017-12;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of
Kincardine ENACTS as follows:
1. That The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine enter into an
agreement with the Bruce Power L.P. for the reimbursement of funds to
the Municipality of Kincardine for assessment services regarding the
• feasibility of providing water and wastewater services to Bruce Nuclear
Generating Station, in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined
in the letter of agreement attached hereto as Schedule 'A' and forming part
of this by-law.
2. That the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer be authorized and directed
to execute, on behalf of the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality
of Kincardine, the agreement with the Bruce Power L.P., attached hereto
as Schedule 'A'.
3. This by-law shall come into full force and effect upon its final passage.
4. This by-law may be cited as the "Bruce Power L.P. Assessment Services
Letter of Agreement By-law".
READ a FIRST and SECOND TIME this 6th day of September, 2017.
READ a THIRD TIME and FINALLY PASSED this 6th day of September, 2017
•
Mayor Clerk
rThis is Schedule "A" to By-Law
No,o 11-iL1 passed the__ _.day
of.Semi 201 Bruce Power
August 31, 2017
The Municipality of Kincardine
1475 Concession 5, RR5
Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6
Attention: Ms. Sharon Chambers, Chief Administrative Officer
Re: Bruce Power L.P. has requested that the Municipality of Kincardine(the
"Municipality")complete a portion of the work necessary to assess (the
"Assessment") the feasibility of the Municipality providing water and
wastewater services (the"Water Services")to the Bruce Nuclear Generating
Station
And Re: Bruce Power has agreed to reimburse the Municipality for the actual third
party cost it incurs in performing such Assessment work all on the following
terms
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter agreement(the "Agreement") is made effective as of the 31st day of August, 2017 (the
"Effective Date") between Bruce Power and the Municipality (collectively, the "Parties" and
individually, a"Party").
This Agreement sets out the terms for Assessment services to be performed by the Municipality and
its subcontractor,B.M.Ross and Associates Limited("BM Ross"),and the reimbursement by Bruce
Power of the costs incurred by the Municipality for the services of BM Ross.
Scope of Work& Schedule
The Municipality agrees that it shall cause BM Ross to complete the following work:
a) the work described in article 3.0 of the BM Ross Memorandum (the "Memorandum")
attached as Exhibit 1 to this Agreement for the Project Initiation Stage, the Phase I —
Problem Definition and Phase II—Alternative Solutions (as described in sections 3.1, 3.2
and 3.3 of Exhibit 1 to this Agreement)and as further described in Table 2(to a maximum
cost of$118,500)and Table 4(to a maximum cost of$53,400)to the Memorandum for all
work up to the end of Phase II to, but not including, the start of Phase III;
b) if determined to be required by BM Ross, acting reasonably, the work described as
allowances for Phase I and Phase II in Table 3 (to a maximum cost of$75,000)and Table 5
(to a maximum cost of$45,000)to the Memorandum
BRUCE POWER L.P., P.O. Box 1540, B10,6th floor, 177 Tie Rd.
Municipality of Kincardine, R.R.#2,Tiverton, Ontario, NOG 2T0
Telephone: (519)361-2673,www.brucepower.com
c) the work described in the work plan attached as Exhibit 2 to this Agreement to the extent
related to Phase I and Phase II;
d) upon completion of the work described in paragraphs a) and b) above, preparation of an
updated estimate for all work associated with Phase III Alternative Designs and Phase IV
Environmental Study Report and Completion;
(collectively the "Work");
e) using reasonable efforts to complete the Work in accordance with the Work schedule
attached as a Exhibit 3 to this Agreement.
Provided that there is no incremental cost above the Cap,Bruce Power agrees that BM Ross shall be
permitted to,acting reasonably,make non-material changes to the scope of the Work, including to
complete such other work that is necessarily ancillary to the Work, as BM Ross determines
necessary. The Municipality shall not permit BM Ross to proceed with any changes in the scope of
Work that would result in an increase in the Cap(including work related to Phase III and VI)or that
would otherwise constitute a material change in the Work unless it has received Bruce Power's prior
written approval for such change in the Work.
Reimbursement
Municipality agrees that the Work shall be performed at a cost that shall not exceed, in the
aggregate, $$291,900 (the "Cap", as may be amended by the written agreement of the parties) as
described in the budget attached as Exhibit 4 to this Agreement.
Bruce Power shall reimburse Municipality for the reasonable subcontractor costs (including BM
Ross) and expenses actually incurred by Municipality during the Term of this Agreement in
connection with the Work up to an aggregate of the Cap all in accordance with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. Bruce Power shall not be liable for any amount in excess of the Cap.
Additional Terms
The Parties agree to comply with the terms set out in Schedule A of this Agreement.
-balance of page intentionally blank-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first set
forth above.
BRUCE POWER L.P.,BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER,BRUCE POWER INC.
By:
Kevin Kelly
Name: CFO&EVP finance&
ommercial Services
Title
By:
Name: Brian Hilbers
Title Chief Legal Officer
BRUCE POWER
LAW DIVISION
Approved: LA
Date: Aug 31/17
THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE
By:
Name: Anne Eadie
Title Mayor
By:
Name: Sharon Chambers
Title Chief Administrative Officer
SCHEDULE A—TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Term & Termination. The term (the "Term") of this Agreement commences on the
Effective Date and ends on the earlier of:
a. the completion of the Work; and
b. the issuance by Bruce Power of notice to immediately terminate this Agreement which
Bruce Power may issue to the Municipality in its sole discretion.
2. Performance Standards. Municipality shall and shall cause its subcontractors to perform
the Work having regard to the best interests of both Municipality and Bruce Power and in
accordance with applicable law, using suitably qualified individuals and with the care and skill
normally exercised by professionals providing similar services under similar circumstances.
Municipality agrees to use and to cause its subcontractors to use commercially reasonable efforts to
promptly complete all of the Work as soon as practical.
3. Deficiencies. Municipality agrees that it shall cause its subcontractors to correct any
deficiencies in the Work at no additional cost to Bruce Power.
4. Invoicing. Municipality shall submit quarterly statements to Bruce Power on or about the
10th day of each month following the end of a quarter detailing the actual costs incurred during the
previous quarter(collectively,the"Quarterly Statements",individually,a"Quarterly Statement").
Municipality shall include in each Quarterly Statement all subcontractor invoiced cost received by
Municipality during the statement period. Provided that Municipality has complied with the terms of
this Agreement in all material respects and has invoiced Bruce Power for such costs,Bruce Power
shall reimburse Municipality for these actual costs within 30 days of Bruce Power receiving such
invoice. Municipality shall not invoice Bruce Power and agrees that Bruce Power is not liable for
any amount that, in the aggregate of all amounts paid or to be paid to Municipality by Bruce Power,
exceeds the Cap. Municipality shall provide and shall cause its subcontractors to provide any
documentation reasonably requested by Bruce Power to verify Quarterly Statements. Municipality
agrees to provide Bruce Power with the hourly rate of each subcontractor personnel that will have
time billed to Bruce Power. For certainty,Bruce Power shall not be liable to reimburse any amount
to Municipality incurred after the date of termination of this Agreement.
5. Costs. Except as may be agreed to herein, each Party agrees to individually bear its own
costs in connection with the Assessment, including, without limitation, in connection with the
preparation and/or review of any definitive agreements for the provision of the Water Services and
for any negotiations relating thereto ("Definitive Agreements").
6. Subcontracting.The Municipality will not subcontract any other component of the Work to
any party other than BM Ross without Bruce Power's prior written consent, such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed(any third party,undertaking any portion of the Work is referred
to as a"subcontractor"and collectively the"subcontractors").The Municipality will require that
each subcontractor comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
7. Reporting. The Municipality agrees that it shall provide full and complete disclosure to
Bruce Power of the Work and all of its components, including all drawings, invoices and reports
prepared by Municipality or its subcontractors (including BM Ross) and such other related
information reasonably requested by Bruce Power. The Municipality shall, and shall cause BM
Ross, to meet with Bruce Power from time to time to discuss the status of the Work and shall
provide cost and schedule reporting in each case as is reasonably requested by Bruce Power. Bruce
Power agrees that if such reporting and meetings is outside the scope of the Work,the Cap shall be
adjusted to account for the increase reporting and/or meetings above those contemplated in the
Work.
8. Limitation of Liability. In the event of breach of this Agreement by either Party it is agreed
that the remedy of the non-breaching Party shall be limited to the recovery of its direct costs and
applicable overhead expended in performing its obligations under this Agreement and there shall be
no liability for loss of present or prospective profits or any other incidental,consequential,or special
damages for or in respect of such breach whether arising in contract, warranty, tort or otherwise.
Municipality and Bruce Power each agree that the other's liability under this agreement shall not
exceed the costs and expenses reasonably incurred by Municipality for the subcontractors in
connection with the Work and, in any event, shall not, in the aggregate, exceed the Cap.
9. Point of Contact.
Each Party will designate in writing one or more individuals within its organization as its point of
contact for the purposes of this Agreement. Initially,the designated points of contact are:
To: Bruce Power L.P.
Name: James Scongack
Title: Vice President, Corporate Affairs
Address: 177 Tie Road, RR2 Tiverton, ON
Facsimile: 519.361.3340
E-mail: james.scongack@brucepower.com
To: Municipality of Kincardine
Name: Adam Weishar
Title: Director of Public Works
Address: 1475 Concession 5, R.R.#5, Kincardine ON,N2Z 2X6
Facsimile: 519-396-1430
E-mail: aweishar@kincardine.net.
A Party may change its point of contact at any time by notice in writing of such change to the other
Parties in writing. Any notice or other communication to be given in connection with this
Agreement must be given in writing and will be given by personal delivery or by electronic means of
communication addressed to the recipient's point of contact identified in accordance with the
provisions of this Section.
10. Legal Commitment. The Parties acknowledge and agree with each other that until one or
more Definitive Agreements have been executed,the Parties will not be under any legal obligation to
pursue or consummate the Water Services or enter into any Definitive Agreements by virtue of this
Agreement. Entering into any one or more Definitive Agreements shall be at the sole and unfettered
discretion of each Party.
11. Miscellaneous.
a. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof and supersedes any previous understandings, commitments, or
agreements,oral or written with respect to the subject matter hereof. No changes may be
made in this Agreement without the written agreement of duly authorized representatives
of each of the Parties. Each Party represents and warrants to the other that there is no
agreement between it and any other person,firm,or corporation which would cause this
Agreement not to have full force and effect.
b. Paragraph headings herein are for convenience only and shall not limit in any way the
scope or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement.
c. This Agreement is governed by and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the
Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein. All Parties hereby attorn
to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario in respect of any
dispute arising out of this Agreement.
d. No Party may assign its interest in this Agreement to any other party without the prior
written consent of the other Party.
e. This Agreement may be executed in any numbers of counterparts,each of which will be
deemed to be an original and all of which taken together will be deemed to constitute one
and the same instrument.
f. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by a Party by electronic
transmission will be as effective as delivery of a manually executed copy of the
Agreement by such Party.
g. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in
part,such invalidity or unenforceability will attach only to such provision or part thereof
and the remaining part of such provision and all other provisions hereof will continue in
full force and effect.
h. No failure or delay by a Party in exercising any right, power or privilege under this
Agreement or otherwise will operate as a waiver thereof, nor will any single or partial
exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any
other right,power or privilege hereunder or otherwise.
i. Unless otherwise specified,all references to money amounts are to the lawful currency of
Canada.
j. The Parties shall with reasonable diligence do all such things and provide all such
reasonable assurances as may be required to consummate the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement,and each Party shall provide such further documents or instruments
required by any other Party as may be reasonably necessary or desirable to effect the
purpose of this Agreement and carry out its provisions.
k. Neither Party has the authority to act as agent for the other Party nor shall either Party
have the right to enter into any binding legal obligation on behalf of the other party.
1. All continuing rights, obligations and provisions intended to survive under this
Agreement will survive the termination or expiry of the Term and of this Agreement.
Exhibit 1 —BM Ross Memorandum
[Attach BM Ross Memo dated July 18,2017]
1111111
14025-17Aug29-Bud
get Memo Final.pdf
(-6BMROSS
engineering better communities
B. M. ROSS AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED Memo
Engineers and Planners
62 North Street,Goderich,ON N7A 2T4 From: Steve Burns
p. (519)524-2641 •f. (519)524-4403 sburns@bmross.net
www.bmross.net
To: Adam Weishar, C.E.T., Director of Public Works
Municipality of Kincardine
Re: Water and Wastewater Servicing to Bruce Power
Work Plans and Budget
File#: 14025
Date: August 29, 2017
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On the assumption that the Municipality of Kincardine will provide potable water supply and wastewater
treatment for the Bruce Power site, the purpose of this Memo is to identify probable costs to define the
means by which servicing would be provided (a Class EA process) and obtain the necessary approvals
and complete the design to the point of being tender ready.
We have developed a Work Plan and Budget for a Schedule C Class EA on the basis that the water
supply to Bruce Power will be a new Water Treatment Plant(WTP) located in the vicinity of
Inverhuron/Bruce Power. The alternatives to be considered through the EA process include both the
source of water to the WTP, the WTP Site and related watermain routes, and the method of treatment.
Regarding the source,the alternatives include the existing Bruce Power owned Industrial Supply and a
new intake into Lake Huron.
The additional costs to complete the necessary technical and Class EA investigations to provide
wastewater treatment are presented in summary form. It is assumed that wastewater treatment will be
provided through expansion/modification/replacement of the existing Kincardine owned BEC WWTP. The
EA effort would be completed in parallel with the water supply EA and have the same general Phases
(i.e. Problem Definition,Alternative Solutions ....). The same meeting and communications schedule
would be used for efficiency. To consider wastewater servicing would not increase the overall schedule.
There is limited information concerning the physical facilities actually required to provide the water and
wastewater servicing. A Technical Memo dated February 27, 2017 provided a concept and a Class 4
opinion of cost for the water supply. No similar work has been done for the wastewater facilities. On the
basis that modifying the existing BEC WWTP will be done at less cost than constructing a new facility at a
new site, as proposed for water supply, we have made a rough judgement of the potential project cost.
This cost opinion should be considered Class 5.
This Memo includes:
• Key assumptions for the Water Supply EA.
• Text explanation of the Work Plan.
• Milestones with budget values and expected completion dates.
• Recommended allowances extra to the budget.
• A summary of the requirements to include an EA for wastewater servicing in parallel with the
Water Supply EA.
• An opinion of the probable costs to advance the preferred method of services to r o�ua181rosW
the tender ready stage. �i
W x
Z:\14025-Kincardine-Consideration Water-Sewage_Services_to_Bruce_Power\WP\14025-17Aug29-Budget
Memo Final.docx w -
Z ^100th INTERNATIONAL
GODERICH MOUNT FOREST SARNIA w O PLOWING MATCH&UAL EXPO
LL
SEPT 19-23•WALTON,ONTARIO
- 2 -
2.0 KEY ASSUMPTIONS FOR WATER SERVICING
Some key assumptions made when developing the Work Plan are as follows:
• The current Master Plan will confirm that a second WTP is the preferred solution if water is to be
supplied to Bruce Power. The focus of the water servicing EA and the investigation of alternatives
will consider three issues--where will the WTP (i.e. the Site) be located, what will be its source of
raw water and lastly, what will be the treatment process.
• The amount of water required by Bruce Power, and any Kincardine uses that would be served by
the new WTP,will be established by the Master Plan work.
• At some point,we will need a formal written request from Bruce Power stating their
water demand requirements. Ideally this will happen as part of the Master Plan process.
• When a site has not been chosen, there is great uncertainty regarding the effort required to
complete archaeological and natural environment investigations which are site specific. Our
approach is to exclude assessment costs from our EA budget and provide suggested separate
allowances. There is a significant probability of there being archaeological and Species at Risk
(SAR) issues for any site in this area.
• Similarly, we will provide separate allowances for investigating a new intake vs using one of the
existing Bruce Power owned supplies. The geotechnical investigations, marine biology and
marine archaeological for a new intake in Lake Huron could cost between $300,000 to$350,000.
• We have included time to assist Kincardine with developing a cost sharing arrangement and
developing water rates.
• We have made provision for an expanded effort regarding First Nations and public review. We
have also suggested a special allowance for assisting the First Nations with their review of any
proposals. Such a contribution is normal for projects of this type.
• No provision has been made in the budget or schedule to address a Part 2 (i.e. bump-up) request
that might be an outcome of the Final Notification.
• We have made provision ($10,000)for peer review of the alternative analysis.
3.0 WORK PLAN DESCRIPTION
We have attached a time-task breakdown (i.e. The Work Plan) based on the following:
3.1 Project Initiation Stage
At this stage, we will make initial contact with known stakeholders including First Nations, agencies and
the public.
A project specific website will be developed and the formal Initial Notice will be published and circulated.
3.2 Phase I -Problem Definition
A problem statement will be developed. It is expected to be-the need to provide a potable water supply
to the BP Site.
In addition to developing a Problem Statement, the focus will be on identifying issues that will be
addressed through the study. The sooner that"issues" are identified the better. We will be working
towards a First Public Information Centre(PIC).
- 3 -
Tasks will include:
• Establishing if using non-potable water from Bruce Power's Industrial Water Supply is feasible.
This is as much or more about ownership and responsibility as it is about technical
considerations.
• Developing and applying criteria that will be used to identify alternative treatment sites.
• Developing a list of possible WTP sites and identifying any obvious property availability issues.
• Establishing a list of possible water intake locations.
• Having further contact with First Nations including meetings.
• Initiating Stage 1 Natural Environment and Archaeological Studies. This work would typically
proceed in Class EA Phase II but the Stage 1 findings could assist in narrowing the list of
alternatives to be examined.
• Preparing and circulating a Technical Memo (TM1)to summarize this Phase and publicize the
Problem Statement.
• Holding a PIC and dealing with responses.
3.3 Phase II -Alternative Solutions
This is the work required to begin comparing water sources, and treatment sites. The outcome of the
initial effort will be a preferred water intake(existing or new) and a short-list of probable WTP sites and
watermain routes that will be refined to establish preferred alternative(s). These will be refined to identify
preferences.
• Evaluation Criteria will be developed to assist in the comparison of alternatives.
• We will develop a list of alternative treatment plant sites.
• For each treatment site option we will identify the probable routing for both raw and treated water
piping.
• Natural Environment and Arch studies will be completed at this time.
• Property matters will also be considered.
• There will be further contact with First Nations.
• Complete an Environmental Effects Analysis and Comparative Analysis.
• High level capital costs will be identified for each site and each watermain route alternative to
allow economic comparison of alternatives.
• Preliminary preferred site and route alternatives will be identified.
• All work will be summarized in TM2
• Meeting to review TM2 and follow up.
3.4 Phase Ill—Alternative Designs
If the preferred or remaining viable solutions include a new intake into Lake Huron the initial investigations
will consist of obtaining a profile and an underwater visual (CCTV)examination along the pipe route and a
geotechnical investigation at the shore. Subject to MNR and MOECC input, it may be necessary to
undertake geotechnical, NE and archaeological evaluations along the route as well. We have provided
suggested allowances, extra to the Work Plan Budget, for this work.
• Intake and treatment alternatives will be identified and examined.
• Concept designs (schematic)will be prepared.
• We will establish expected operating costs for the WTP including identifying variations based on
source location and treatment approach.
• Identify probable WTP and Operator classification requirements.
• Visit the Southampton WTP to learn local operator experience with membranes.
• Complete a more detailed environmental impact analysis including an Environmental Effects
Analysis and a Comparative Analysis.
• Identifying and describing the preferred solutions (site, intake and WM route)
• Any specific property acquisition requirements will be identified for action by the Municipality.
• Probable Capital costs will be refined.
• Probable Operating Costs will be refined.
• Summarizing the work in TM3
-4-
• Meeting to review TM3 and follow up
• Further First Nations contact.
Cost Sharing Analysis
Although it is not a critical issue for the Class EA, it will be important that Kincardine and Bruce Power
reach agreement on both capital and operating cost sharing. It will be necessary to develop a probable
water rate and an adjustment formula. This work will be included as part of Phase III. It will include:
• Cost sharing discussions between BP and Kincardine.
• Additional cost analysis.
• Development of a preliminary water rate.
• Summarizing the work in TM4
• Meeting to review TM4
3.5 Phase IV—Environmental Study Report(ESR)and Completion
The EA work will be summarized in an ESR. There will bel st and 2nd Draft and Final versions. The 1st
Draft will have extensive circulation and be presented at the 2nd PIC. Subsequent to the circulation, the
PIC and the review of all comments received, a 2nd Draft of the ESR will be prepared and made available
for public review. The Notice of EA Completion will then be prepared and advertised. The Final ESR will
be prepared after the notification period.
4.0 SCHEDULE
We have attached a preliminary Schedule for the EA. We are anticipating the project will take until the
Summer of 2019 to complete. The long schedule recognizes that we could not complete any Stage 2
Natural Environment investigations prior to the spring/summer of 2018. It also assumes typically long
turn-around times for Agency and First Nations responses.
A summary of the Schedule is as follows:
Table 1
Preliminary Schedule
Activity Expected Completion
Phase I—Problem Definition December 2017
Phase II —Alternative Solutions August 2018
Phase III—Alternative Design February 2019
Phase IV—Reporting and Completion June 2019
Note, if public interest in the proposal is significant, the timing of the 2nd PIC may have to be delayed to
accommodate seasonal property owners.
5.0 MILESTONES—BUDGET—SCHEDULE
Class EAs follow a defined sequence of Phases starting with definition of the Problem and ending with
preparation of a Report(ESR) and Formal Notice of Completion. Our Work Plan includes several
Technical Memos, each will be a Milestone. The following table identifies the Milestones, the expected
cost to reach the Milestone and the expected timing.
- 5 -
Table 2
Water EA Milestones-Expected Cost and Expected Timing
Milestone Incremental Cost Accumulated Cost Expected
Completions
Project Start - $0 September 18, 2017
Initial Notice $4,300 $4,300 September 2017
Technical Memo 1 $33,700 $38,000 November 2017
Public Information Centre 1 $6,100 $44,100 December 2017
End of Phase I/Start Phase II - $44,100 December 2017
Technical Memo 2 $74,400 $118,500 July 2018
End Phase II/Start Phase III - $118,500 August 2018
Technical Memo 3 $65,300 $183,800 October 2018
Technical Memo 4 $11,400 $195,200 November 2018
End Phase III/Start Phase IV $9,200 $204,400 February 2019
Complete Draft ESR $37,800 $242,200 February 2019
Public Information Centre 2 $8,300 $250,500 April 2019
Notice of Completion $1,000 $251 500
May 2019
Final ESR-End Phase IV - $251,500 June 2019
6.0 RECOMMENDED ALLOWANCES
Throughout the EA process there are activities related to investigating alternatives that are dependent on
the specific alternative or site and the results of prior work. In most cases, the activity usually involves
retaining specialist firms to undertake field studies related to identifying potential environmental impacts
(e.g. archaeological sites, species at risk) or factors that could affect project costs (e.g. geotechnical
conditions). Table 3 provides a list of suggested allowances that are extra to the expected costs
identified in Table 2.
Table 3
Summary of Allowances for Water Supply EA
Task Allowance Trigger
Stage 1 -Natural Environment $10,000 Identification of alternative sites
Archaeology-Stage 1 and 2 $15,000 Identification of alternative sites
Contribution to First Nations and Metis Review $20,000 Identification of alternative sites
Stage 2-Natural Environment $30,000 Findings from Stage 1
Allowances for Class EA Phase I and II $75,000
Archaeology-Stage 3/4 $50,000 Findings from Stage 2 Archaeology
Lake profile for intake $10,000 New intake is preferred source
Initial Geotechnical for WTP and Intake (shore only) $25,000 New intake is preferred source
CCTV for Lake Intake $20,000 New intake is preferred source
Natural Environment and Archaeology for Intake $150,000 New intake is preferred source
Geotechnical on Intake Route (marine) $150,000 New intake is preferred source
Allowances for Class EA Phases III and IV $405,000
Total Allowances $480,000
The above values represent best estimates at this stage. Approval to proceed would be sought as
required and detailed scopes would be developed for each requirement.
7.0 SUMMARY FOR WATER SERVICING EA
The EA for water servicing will follow the procedures required for a Schedule C Class EA as per the
Municipal Engineers Association Class Environmental Assessment document(2015 Edition).
- 6 -
The recommended base budget for the EA is$251,500. A further$480,000 is recommended as
allowances that may or may not be required and would be subject to further approval. Approximately
$350,000 of the allowances applies to the investigations required for a new water intake. These costs
would be triggered by a decision at the end of Class EA Phase II, that a new intake is part of the preferred
solution.
Base budget and allowances to complete Phases I and II of the EA total$193,500.
Assuming a project start in September 2017, we anticipate completion in June 2019. Phase II is expected
to be complete in August 2018.
8.0 ADDITIONAL FOR WASTEWATER SERVICING EA
8.1 General Approach
As noted previously, the key assumption is that BP wastewater would be transmitted to the existing BEC
VWVTP which would be expanded, modified or replaced. This eliminates investigating site alternatives.
Therefore, the focus of the Class EA would be on effluent quality and treatment alternatives. The
schedule would parallel the water servicing EA to take advantage of meetings and notifications but all
documentation would be separate for the two assignments.
8.2 Key Assumptions
In addition to the previous comments, the key assumptions related to the budget are:
• BP will provide values for the flow rate and volume of wastewater to be treated.
• Site specific studies will be addressed as allowances. Use of the existing site will limit the
requirement.
• Time is included to address capital cost sharing and rate development.
• An allowance is proposed to assist First Nations and Metis reviews.
8.3 Wastewater EA—Budget and Schedule
Table 4 provides a summary of the expected as additional costs linked to project milestones.
Table 4
Wastewater EA Milestones—Expected Cost and Expected timing
Milestone Incremental Cost Accumulated Cost Expected
Completions
Project Start - $0 September 18, 2017
Initial Notice $3,700 $3,700 September 2017
Technical Memo 1 $14,900 $18,600 November 2017
Public Information Centre 1 $3,200 $21,800 December2017
End of Phase I/Start Phase II - $21,800 December 2017
Technical Memo 2 $31,600 $53,400 July 2018
End Phase II/Start Phase III - $53,400 August 2018
Technical Memo 3 $35,600 $89,000 October 2018
Technical Memo 4 $4,400 $93,400 November 2018
End Phase III/Start Phase IV $1,900 $95,300 February 2019
Complete Draft ESR $24,500 $119,800 February 2019
Public Information Centre 2 $5,600 $125,400 April 2019
Notice of Completion $1,500 $126,900 May 2019
Final ESR—End Phase IV - $126,900 June 2019
- 7-
8.4 Recommended Allowances
Table 5
Summary of Allowances for Wastewater EA
Task Allowance Trigger
Stage 1 —Natural Environment $5,000 Identification of alternative sites
Archaeology—Stage 1 and 2 $10,000 Identification of undisturbed sites
Stage 2—Natural Environment $10,000 Findings from Stage 1 NE Study
Contribution to First Nations and Metis Review $20,000 Identification of alternatives
Allowances for Class EA Phases I and II $45,000
Archaeology—Stage 3/4 $15,000 Findings from Stage 2 Archaeology
Geotechnical $15,000 A site without prior geotechnical
Allowances for Class EA Phases III and IV $30,000
Total Allowances $75,000
8.5 Summary for Wastewater Servicing EA
The EA for wastewater servicing will follow the procedures required for a Schedule C Class EA similar to
the Water Supply EA described previously.
The recommended base budget for the Wastewater EA is $126,900. A further$75,000 is recommended
for allowances. Assuming a project start in September 2017, we anticipate completion in June 2019.
Expected costs and allowances up to the end of Class EA Phase II are$53,400 +$45,000=$98,400.
9.0 PRELIMINARY COST TO GET TO TENDER READY
It is understood there is an interest in identifying potential costs to develop the water and wastewater
servicing projects to a"tender ready" stage. The definition of tender ready is: it is known what is to be
constructed, the final design including drawings and specifications and tender documents are complete
and all approvals are in place.
To provide an opinion of the cost, it is necessary to know what will be constructed. Currently we have a
preliminary concept for the water supply as described in Water Supply to Bruce Power Technical Memo
No. 1, dated February 27, 2017. The required wastewater servicing requirements have not been studied
but as described previously in this Memo, are expected to involve use of the existing BEC WWTP.
Intuitively, the ability to use an existing site will result in lesser costs than the water supply approach. A
best guess is 75% of the water servicing cost.
Given the lack of detail, the costs to develop the water servicing project to the tender ready stage should
be considered a Class 4 estimate(-15%to+50%). For the wastewater project it should be considered
Class 5 (-20%to +100%). We propose that the cost allowance to advance the project from the
completion of the two EAs to tender ready be based on 5%of the possible project costs, as follows:
• For water supply(from Feb. 27/17 TM1) — 5%of$29M = $1.5M
• For wastewater(75% of$29M) — 5% of$22M = $1.1M
Total Cost to Tender Ready $2.6M
10.0 BUDGET SUMMARY
This memo provides a detailed work plan for a water supply Class EA, a general description of a work
plan for a wastewater treatment Class EA and suggested budgets and allowances for both. Also included
are high level estimates of the costs to advance the projects to the tender ready stage. A summary is as
follows:
- 8 -
Table 6
Cost Summary
Project Component Suggested Suggested
Base Cost Allowances
Water Supply EA-to complete EA Phases I & II $118,500 $75,000
-to complete EA Phases III &IV $133,000 $405,0001
Total for Water Supply EA $251,500 $480,000
Wastewater EA-to complete EA Phases I &II $53,400 $45,000
-to complete EA Phases III & IV $73,500 $30,000
Total for Wastewater EA $126,900 $75,000
Water Supply to Tender Ready(additional to EA) $1,500,000
Wastewater to Tender Ready(additional to EA) $1,100,000
Note: ' Of the$405,000 approximately$350,000 relates to investigations for a new water intake.
Stephen D. Burns, P. Eng.
SDB:hv
Exhibit 1 -Description of Work
[attach preliminary work plan]
14025-WorkPlan.pdf
I
Municipality of Kincardine
Preliminary Work Plan
Consideration of Water Service to Bruce Power-EA
Staff&Time Commitment(Hours)
Steve Burns Andrew Garland Ryan Steckly Lisa Courtney Matt Pearson Bruce Potter Rick Steele Tracey Coward Student Evelyn Smith Brenda Fisher
Total Hours
No. Description Code Sr.Eng. Proj.Eng. Proj.Eng. Sr.Planner Sr.Planner Sr.Eng. Info.Mgr. GIS Tech. Student Secretary P&Q Co-ord.
Hrs Firs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs
1.0 Administration
1.1 Work Plan development 35.0 10.0 10.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 63.0
1.2 Monthly invoicing 8.0 11.0 19.0
1.3 Lessons learned/archiving 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.5
1.4 QA/QC 22.0 3.0 25.0
• rr .�:..:... 3.r.... x a .r i -- - �,� 112.5
Sub-total ...
2.0 Project Initiation
2.1 Review background information 4.0 4.0 8.0
2.2. Obtain GIS data 1.0 1.0
2.3 Confirm capacity requirements 2.0 8.0 10.0
2.4 Prepare initial mapping 1.0 1.0 6.0 8.0
2.5 Prepare agency list 0.5 0.5
2.6 Prepare First Nation(FN)list 0.5 0.5
2.7 Draft agency/FN letter 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
2.8 Prepare property owner/stakeholder list 1.0 1.0
2.9 Draft Initial Notice 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
2.10 Mail letters/Notice 0.5 1.0 1.5
12.0 0 .110111.111.1M___ 0.0 1.0 6.
3.0 Phase 1-Problem Definition
3.1 Identify PTTW issues 0.5 3.0 1.0 4.5
3.2 Identify property area required 1.0 1.5 2.0 4.5
3.3 Identify preliminary site alternatives 8.0 8.0 8.0 • 1.0 4.0 29.0
3.4 Prepare website materials 1.0 1.0
3.5 Identify property ownership 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.5
3.6 Review agency input 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.5 8.5
3.7 Review public/stakeholder input 1.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 _ 4.0
3.8 Prepare mapping for arch and bio subs 4.0 2.0 8.0 14.0
3.9 Obtain and review arch and bio quotes 0.5 2.0 0.5 3.0
3.10 Phase 1 bio survey 2.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 4.0 18.0
3.11 Phase 1 arch.study 2.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 4.0 18.0
3.12 Determine raw water quality 2.0 4.0 12.0 18.0
3.13 Identify property issues 0.5 5.0 5.0 10.5
3.14 Meet with SON 8.0 8.0 8.0 24.0
3.15 Meet with HSM 6.0 6.0 6.0 18.0
Z:\14025-Kincardine-Consideration_Water-Sewage_Services_to_Bruce_Power\Projects\Project Management\14025-WorkPlan 1
Staff&Time Commitment(Hours)
Steve Burns Andrew Garland Ryan Steckly Lisa Courtney Matt Pearson Bruce Potter Rick Steele Tracey Coward Student Evelyn Smith Brenda Fisher
Total Hours
No. Description Code Sr.Eng. Proj.Eng. Proj.Eng. Sr.Planner Sr.Planner Sr.Eng. Info.Mgr. GIS Tech. Student Secretary P&Q Co-ord.
Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs
3.16 Problem Definition 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 4.0
3.17 Technical Memo 1 8.0 16.0 1.0 8.0 0.5 0.5 8.0 3.0 45.0
3.18 Meeting to review TM1 8.0 12.0 0.5 1.0 21.5
3.19 Circulate TM1 1.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.5
3.20 Draft and issue PIC1 Notice 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 4.0 6.5
3.21 Prep PIC1 materials 2.0 4.0 6.0 0.5 0.5 6.0 19.0
3.22 Attend PIC1 4.0 4.0 4.0 12.0
3.23 Respond to feedback 2.0 4.0 4.0 10.0
4.0 Phase 2-Alternative Solutions
4.1 Identify intake alternatives 8.0 12.0 4.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 28.0
4.2 Determine watermain route options 8.0 8.0 1.0 6.0 23.0
4.3 Complete water quality study 8.0 1.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 19.0
4.4 Study for water intake 8.0 8.0 4.0 20.0
4.5 Complete property study for WM 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 8.0 1.0 17.0
4.6 Coordinate subs(Phase 2 studies) 2.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 22.0
4.7 Review sub studies 2.0 8.0 8.0 2.0 20.0
4.8 Prepare sub study summaries 0.5 2.0 6.0 0.5 9.0
4.9 Distribute sub studies 1.0 0.5 1.5
4.10 Meet with agencies 6.0 6.0 6.0 18.0
4.11 Meet with SON 8.0 10.0 8.0 26.0
4.12 Establish evaluation criteria 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 4.5
4.13 Evaluate alternative supplies 12.0 12.0 1.0 8.0 33.0
4.14 Evaluate alternative sites 12.0 12.0 1.0 4.0 29.0
4.15 Identify impacts 4.0 4.0 2.0 8.0 18.0
4.16 Identify preliminary preferred site 4.0 8.0 4.0 0.5 2.0 18.5
4.17 Confirm property availability 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0
4.18 Identify potential mitigation for impacts 2.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 11.0
4.19 Determine high-level capital costs 4.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 44.0
4.20 Technical Memo 2 8.0 8.0 20.0 10.0 1.0 3.0 50.0
4.21 Meeting to review TM2 8.0 8.0 8.0 1.0 25.0
4.22 Distribute TM2 1.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 7.0
ft
� 68.0 77.5 16.5 3.0 2.0 5.0 0.0
5.0 Phase 3-Alternative Design
•
5.1 Determine treatment alternatives 12.0 6.0 50.0 68.0
5.2 Determine WM Route 4.0 8.0 0.5 12.5
5.3 Review other WTP Experience 8.0 4.0 12.0 24.0
5.4 Intake profile 2.0 8.0 10.0
Z:\14025-Kincardine-Consideration_Water-Sewage_Services_to_Bruce_Power\Projects\Project Management\14025-WorkPlan 2
Staff&Time Commitment(Hours)
Steve Burns Andrew Garland Ryan Steckly Lisa Courtney Matt Pearson Bruce Potter Rick Steele Tracey Coward Student Evelyn Smith Brenda Fisher
Total Hours
No. Description Code Sr.Eng. Proj.Eng. Proj.Eng. Sr.Planner Sr.Planner Sr.Eng. Info.Mgr. GIS Tech. Student Secretary P&Q Co-ord.
Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs
5.5 Intake CCTV 2.0 8.0 10.0
5.6 Intake geotechnical 2.0 8.0 10.0
5.7 Determine Operating Costs 2.0 8.0 24.0 34.0
5.8 Determine operator skill needs 1.0 0.5 2.0 3.5
5.9 Establish design evaluation criteria 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0
5.10 Evaluate design alternatives 4.0 4.0 50.0 4.0 62.0
5.11 Identify impacts 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 15.0
5.12 Identify preliminary preferred design 4.0 8.0 8.0 1.0 21.0
5.13 Revise capital costs 4.0 8.0 12.0 0.5 4.0 28.5
5.14 Technical Memo 3 8.0 8.0 20.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 41.0
5.15 Meeting to review TM3 8.0 8.0 8.0 1.0 25.0
5.16 Distribute TM3 1.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 7.0
5.17 Initiate cost-sharing discussions 2.0 1.0 0.5 3.5
5.18 Cost-sharing analysis 8.0 1.0 0.5 2.0 8.0 19.5
5.19 Determine capital sharing 4.0 1.0 5.0
5.20 Determine water rates 8.0 4.0 12.0
5.21 Technical Memo 4 8.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 15.0
5.22 Meeting to Review TM4 8.0 4.0 1.0 13.0
5.23 Distribute TM4 1.0 0.5 2.0 3.5
5.24 Complete cost-sharing 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0
5.25 Agency meeting 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 24.0
5.26 Meet with SON 12.0 12.0 6.0 30.0
0.0
3' 114.0 123.5 197.0 350111.11r 1:' o
6.0 Phase 4-Environmental Study Report
6.1 Prepare 1st draft of ESR 20.0 75.0 20.0 75.0 10.0 50.0 15.0 265.0
6.2 Present draft ESR to Kincardine 10.0 6.0 6.0 22.0
6.3 Submit draft ESR to agencies 0.5 2.0 0.5 3.0
6.4 Submit draft ESR to BP 0.5 0.5 1.0
6.5 Submit draft ESR to FN 0.5 0.5 1.0
6.6 Draft and issue PIC2 Notice 1.0 4.0 5.0
6.7 Prep PIC2 materials 2.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 8.0
26.0
6.8 Attend PIC2 4.0 4.0 4.0 12.0
6.9 Respond to feedback 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0
6.10 Prepare 2nd draft of ESR 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 14.0
6.11 Draft Notice of Completion 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.5
6.12 Publish Notice of Completion 0.5 2.0 2.5
6.13 Prepare Final Report 2.0 1.0 2.0 5.0
0.0
b-total 2i,,,. ,. 103.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 60.0 11.0 21.5 0.0 a„ t30_,._.i
Z:\14025-Kincardine-Consideration_Water-Sewage_Services_to_Bruce_Power\Projects\Project Management\14025-WorkPlan 3
Staff&Time Commitment(Hours)
Steve Burns Andrew Garland Ryan Steckly Lisa Courtney Matt Pearson Bruce Potter Rick Steele Tracey Coward Student Evelyn Smith Brenda Fisher
Total Hours
No. Description Code Sr.Eng. Proj.Eng. Proj.Eng. Sr.Planner Sr.Planner Sr.Eng. Info.Mgr. GIS Tech. Student Secretary P&Q Co-ord.
Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs
Hours 378.5 459.5 292.0 314.5 66.5 6.5 6.0 113.0 68.0 62.0 7.0 1,773.5
Z:\14025-Kincardine-Consideration_Water-Sewage_Services_to_Bruce_Power\Projects\Project Management\14025-WorkPlan 4
Exhibit 3 - Schedule
IMO
14025-WorkSchedule
-V5.pdf
Menkipe8ty of Kincardine
Condlerati®wof Water Service to arum Power,Schedule C PA
D Tai Name .__`oruoon ....Shin S meessrns....hnh .,,s _..
03° -Set Oct late -Dec bo >r an My At, Mar tun ,ui nay Sep Oct Nov Dec t. Feb Mar , .�^ a
Project loioei Silents Aon 18Sep Oral 27/Sep <
t—e PlOjeCt 1nmdiatron
Review baciground-inforrraation 'S'days Mon lir Sep Fri 22+rap
• Obtain GIS data 1day Man 18 Sep Mn18 Sep
• Confirm capacity requirements 1-day Mon 25 Sep 2 Mon 2S Sep
Prepare ireitial mapping lrtay Tun 19 Sep 3 Tae 193Rµ+ _._._......
• Prepare agency list 115 days Mon 25 Sep 2 Mon 25 Sep
Prepare FN list 0.S trays Man 25 Sep 2 Man 25 Sep
e_ Draft agency/FN letter O.S days Man 25 Sep 6 Mo 2S Sep
Prepare property owner/stakeholder list allay 8r4o4r 2S Sep 7 Tue 26 Sere
17 Draft'iniitial Notice 03 days Wed 20 Sep 5 Wed 20 Sep
11
Mail letters/Notice 1day lex 26 Sep 10,8,9 Wed 27 Sep
17 Prepare website materials OS days Wed 27 Sep 11 Wed 27 Sep
13 Mase 1-Problem De ion 72.5 days Mar 2S Sep Pd 12 Mn Phase 1-Problem Definition
1 t
11 Identify PTT W issues 10 days Man 2S Sep 2 Fri 06 Oct _
13 Review agency input 30 days Wed 27 Sep 11 Wed 08 Nov
15 Review public/stakeholder input 30 days Wed 27 Sep 11 Wed 08 Nov,
12 Problem Definition 2 days Mon 09 Oct 14 Toe 10 Oct
18 Identify property area required 1 day Wed 11 Oct 17 Wed 11 Oct
19 Identify intake alternatives 2 days Wed 11 Oct 17 Thu 12 Oct
20 Determine raw water quality 10 days Wed 11 00 17 Tue 2400
21 Determine watermain route options 3 days Wed 11 Oct 17 Fri 13 Oct
22 Identify preliminary site alternatives 2 days Thu 12 Oct 18 Fri 13 Oct
23 Identify property needs 10 days Mon 16 Oct 22,19,21 Fri 27Oct
22 Identify property ownership 1 wk Mon 16 Oct 22 Fri 2000
25 Complete property study for WM 15 days Mon 23 Oct 24 Fri 10 Nov
26 Complete water quality study 10 days Mon 23 Oct 24 Fri 03 Nov
2, Study for water intake 1wk Mon 23 Oct 24 Fri27 Oct
Z8 Prepare mapping for arch and bio subs 2 days Mon 23 Oct 24 Tue 24 Oct •
29 Obtain and review arch and bio quotes 2 was Wed 25 Oct 28 Tue 07 Nov
38 Stage 1 arch.Study 4wks Mon 13 Nov 29,19,25,23 Fri 08 Dec -
31 Prepare Technical Memo 1 5 days Wed Oa Nov 15,16 Wed 15 Nov
L
Project:14025-WorkSchedule-V5 1 Task Maeseone • Pryeae Plus.r�'1 Meeting IIII
Date:Tue 29 Aug
Municipality of Kincardine
ConsWention of Water Service to Brum Power-Schedule C EA
ID 144Name Dumon '94n Predecessors firrth y+3 27'-'
+eg See Ar Ut a. ret Mn, 4r- v3Y ar ,� Mg c. Oct .r. Cr .a ._o n. Ae lSq ,_, .— A,. ,
32 TM1 Odays Wd is wee Wed 15 Nov
TM1 y 15 November 2017
33 Meeting to revieTMl 10 days Wed 1S Noe 31 Wed 29 Nov
him Meeting to review TM1
34 Orculate TAU. 15 days Wed29Nov 33 Wed 20 Dec
35 Meet with SON 2wks Wed 20 Dec 34 Fel12Jan
i`-Meet-with-SON- ---
36 Meet with l-4SM 2 Mrs Wed 20 Dec 34 Fri 12 Jan
imw-Meetwith-HSM
35 Draft and issues?ICI Notice 2 wks Wed 29 Nov 33 Wed 13 Dec
3e Prep PIC1 materials 1w Wed 00Dec 37J1- Wed 13 Dec
A
39 Attend PIC1 0 days Wed 13 Dec 37W4 Wed 13 Dec
Attend PTCI w 13 December 2017
40 Respond to feedback 1 wk Wed 13 Dec 39 Wed 20 Dec
41 Phase 2-AIternive Solutions 172.5 days Wed 13Dec Tee sl May Phase 2-Alternative Solutions
1
42 Determine treatment alternatives 5 days Wed 13 Dec 26,39 Wed 20 Dec
w
43 Determine WM Route 3 days Wed 13 Dec 27,39 Mon 18 Dec
wr
44 Review other MP Experience 10 days Wed 20 Dec 42 Fri 12 Jan
45 Determine Operating Costs 5 days Wed 20 Dec 42 Fri 05Jan
46 Determine operator skill needs 5 days Wed 20 Dec 42 Fri 05 Jan
47 Determine high-level capital costs 6 days Fri 121ar 43,44,45,46 Mon 22Jan
48 Coordinate bio study and Stage 2+arch. 65 days Wed 04 Apr 43 Tue 03 Jul
Studies
49 Review sub studies 1 wk Wed 04111 48 Tue 10 Jul
50 Prepare sub study summaries 4 days Wed 11 Jul 49 Mon 16 Jul
51 Distribute sub studies 2 days rue 17 Jul 50 Wed 18J11
52 Prepare Technical Memo 2 5 days Wed 11 Jul 40,47,35,36,4Tee 17 Jul w
53 TM2 0 days Tue 17 Jul 52 Tue 17 ltd
TM2 j 17 July 2018
54 Meeting to review 1M2 10 days Wed 18 Jul 52 Tue 31 Jul
iym Meeting to review TM2
55 Distribute TM2 15 days Wed 01 Aug 54 Tue 21 Aug
56 Meet with agencies 1 wk Thu 19 Jul 51 Wed 25 Jul
i.Meet with agencies
S7 Meet with FN 1 wk Thu 26 Jul 56 Wed 01 Aug
Es.Meet with FN _...-
58 Identify impacts 1 wk Thu 02 Aug 57 Wed 08 Aug _
59 Phase 3-Alternative Design 137 days Tue 17 Jul Mon 04 Feb Phase 3-Alternative Design
,
60 Intake profile 20 days Wed 22 Aug 55 Tue 18Sep
61 Intake CCTV 20 days Wed 22 Aug 55 Tue 18 Sep
62 Intake geotechnical 20 days Wed 22 Aug 55 Tue 18 Sep
Project.14025-WorkSchedule-95 2 ,, rr :-, a erjm Phase 1— I V,,9 11
Date'Tue 29 Aug
Munkipality of Kincardine
Consideration of Water Service to Bruce Power•Schedule C EA
ID Task Name 931aation Start Prestert,sors crush 'ars Di9
,.. , ,,, 7, ', .,,, ,t) A., ,,f, Oa DE: i F,, V, tF ,,,,, 2, A, .e..,
63 Establish evaluation criteria 2 days Toe 17 Ad 42,41,44,45Wed 18 Jul
...
• Evaluate alternative supplies 1 wk Wed 19 Sep 63.60,61,62,,Tue 25 Sep ..
65 Evaluate alternative sites 1 wk Thul9Ail 63 Wed.25231
6' identity preliminary preferred solution 2 days Thu 26141 65 Fri 27 JUI
-' Confirm property availability 20 days Mon 30.kd 66 Pri 24 Aug
Identify potential mitigation for impacts 1 sek Mon 30231 66 Pri 03 Aug
9° Establish design evaluation criteria 2 days Mon%Aug 68 Tue 07 Aug
70 Prepare Technical Memo 3 5 days Wed 26 Sep 60,61,62,63,011,e 02 Oct ...
n TM3 0 days Tun 02 Oct 70 Taw 02 Oct
TM3 '02 October 2018
72 Meeting to review TM3 1 wk Wed 03 Oct 70 Toe CI9 Oct
in Meeting to review TM3
73 Distribute TM3 15 days Wed 10 Oct 72 Tue 30 Oct
-,i' Revise capital costs 1 wk Wed 03 Oct 70 Tue 09 Oct
m initiate cost-sharing discussions 10 days Wed 10 Oct 74 Tue 23 Oct
76 Cost-sharing analysis 5 days Wed 24 Oct 75 Tue30 Oct
17 Determine capital sharing 5 days Wed 31 Oct 76 Tue 06 Nov
78 Determine water rates 5 days Wed 07 Nov 77 Tue 13 Nov
,9 Prepare Technical Memo 4 5 days Wed 14 Nov 75,77,78 Tue 20 Nov ..
a° TM4 0 days Tue 20 Nor 19 Tue 70 Nor
TM4:20 November 2018
8' Meeting to Review TM4 10 days Wed 21 Nov 79 Tue 04 Dec
Meeting to Review TM4
82 Distribute TM4 15 days Wed 05 Dec 81 Fri 04 len
83 Complete cost-sharing 10 days Mon 071an 82 Fei 18 Jan
84 Evaluate design alternatives lob Mon 07 Jan 82 Fri 11 Jan ,
85 Identify impacts 4 days Mon 14 Jan 84 Thu 17 Jan
86 Identify preliminary preferred design 2 days Fri 18 Jan 85 Mon 21 Jan
87 Agency meeting 10 days Tue 22 Jan 86 Mon 04 Feb
Agency meeting
$8 FN meeting 10 days Tue 22 Jan 86,57 Mon 04 Feb
lir FN meeting
" Phase 4-Environmental Study Report 141 days Thu 29 Nov Tue 25 Jun Phase 4-Erndroomental Study Report
. ,
98 Prepare 1st draft of ESR 40 days Thu 29 Nov 87FF,88FF,73IVIon 04 Feb . 4
9' Draft ESR 0 days Mon 04 Feb 90 Mon 04 Feb
Draft ESR...'04 February 2019
92 Present draft ESR to Kincardine 10 days Tue 05 Feb 90,83 Mal 18 Feb
Irma-Present draft ESR taKincardine
93 Submit draft ESR to agencies 30 days Tue 19 Feb 92 Mon 01 Apr
T
Project 14025-WorkSchedule-V5 3 T,sk n.,,,, • Pr*,Phase 1................ Veebrg IMMI
DateTue 29 Aug
Munkipallty of Kincardine
Consideration of Water Service to Bruce Power-Schedule C EA
ID Task Name Anmion Sias Rrede®6 Rni Ni3
231? Jul At9 SW
.119 SSP Oct Nov Dec Ac 1.2 Mrr Al' MeV ,un l�� A'�q 5<p Nov Dec f Feb Mar AF May km
96 Submit draft FSR to BP 30 days Toe 19 Feb 92 Mon 01 Apr
95 Submit draft FSA to FN 30 days Toe 19 Feb 92 Mon 01 Apr w
96 Draft and issue PIC2 Notice 2 wits Toe 02 Apr 9293,94,95 Mon 15 Ape
97 Prep PIC2 materials a wk Tue 09 Apr 96FF Mon 15 Apr
1
5e Attend PIC2 o days Moo 15 Apr 96FF Moa 15 Apr
Attend PIC2 y 15 April 2019
99 Respond to feedback 2 wits Tue 16 Apr 98 Mon 29 Apr
10o Prepare 2nd draft of ESR 1 wk Tue 30 Apr 98.92,93,944 Mon 06 May ee
101 Draft Notice of Completion 1 day Toe 07 May 100 Tue 07 May
102 Publish Notice of Completion 30 days Wed 08 May 101 Tue 18Jun
reepowsowne Publish Notice of Completion
103 Prepare Final Report 5days Wed 19 Jun 102 Tue 251tarin
104 Final ESR Odays Tue ZS An 103 Toe 25 Jun _....
Final ESR 4'25 June 2019
Project 14025-WorkSchedule-V5 4 Tao 41.1181UMPAATeSss AoeAooe ♦ P.t 11 Me., tiMill
------- — —
Date Tue 29 Aug
Exhibit 4—Budget
The budget for the Work includes:
• Water Supply EA Phases I and II in the amount of$118, 500 and allowances of up to
$75,000
• Wastewater EA Phases Phases I and II in the amount of$53,400 and allowances of up to
$45,000
The Cap for the Work is $291,900.
The following is an estimate of the costs of all work related to the Assessment and is provided
for reference purposes only:
Table 6
Cost Summary
Project Component Suggested Suggested
Base Cost Allowances
Water Supply EA - to complete EA Phases I&II $1 18,500 $75,000
-to complete EA Phases III&IV $133,000 $405,000'
Total for Water Supply EA $251,500 $480,000
Wastewater EA-to complete EA Phases I&II $53,400 $45,000
-to complete EA Phases III& IV $73,500 $30,000
Total for Wastewater EA $126,900 $75,000
Water Supply to Tender Ready(additional to EA) $1,500,000
Wastewater to Tender Ready(additional to EA) $1,100,000
Note: 1 Of the$405,000 approximately$350,000 relates to investigations of a new water intake.
Bruce Power
VIA COURIER
September 19, 2017
Jennifer Lawrie
Deputy Clerk
Municipality of Kincardine
1475 Concession 5, R.R. 5
Kincardine, ON
N2Z 2X6
Dear Jennifer:
Re: Bruce Power L.P. Assessment Services Letter of Agreement
As requested, please find enclosed one (1) fully executed original of the Bruce Power L.P.
Assessment Services Letter of Agreement.
Sincerely,
')Y1
Michelle Beaune
Personal Assistant
Bruce Power Law Division
BRUCE POWER L.P.,P.O.Box 1540,B10,6`h floor, 177 Tie Rd.
Municipality of Kincardine,R.R.#2,Tiverton,Ontario,NOG 2T0
Telephone: (519)361-4418 Facsimile: (519)361-4333,