Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 078 MD#9 - Anness Drain - Branches A&B 2011 By-law THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE K KBT_ yx t l t m BY-LAW NO. 2011 - 078 BEING A BY -LAW TO PROVIDE FOR A DRAINAGE WORKS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE IN THE COUNTY OF BRUCE WHEREAS the requisite number of owners have petitioned the council of the Municipality of Kincardine in the County of Bruce in accordance with the provisions of the Drainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter D.17, requesting that the following • lands and roads be drained by a drainage works: MD #9 — Anness Drain — Branches A &B - 2011; AND WHEREAS the council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine, in the County of Bruce has procured a report made by R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited and the report is attached hereto and forms part of this by -law; AND WHEREAS the estimated total cost of constructing the drainage works is $99,900.00; AND WHEREAS $4,790.00 is the amount to be contributed by the municipality for construction of the drainage works; AND WHEREAS the council is of the opinion that the drainage of the area is desirable; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine, under the Drainage Act, ENACTS as follows: • 1. That the Engineer's Report dated April 29, 2011, and attached hereto, is hereby adopted and the drainage works as therein indicated and set forth is hereby authorized and shall be completed in accordance therewith. 2. (1) The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine may borrow on the credit of the Corporation the amount of $99,900.00 being the amount necessary for construction of the drainage works. (2) The Corporation may issue debentures for the amount borrowed less the total amount of, (a) grants received under Section 85 of the Act; (b) commuted payments made in respect of lands and roads assessed within the municipality; (c) money paid under subsection 61 (3) of the Act, (d) money assessed in and payable by another municipality, • i2 Page 2 MD #9 — Anness Drain — Branches A &B — 2011 By -law • By -law No. 2011 - 078 and such debentures shall be made payable within 5 years from the date of the debenture and shall bear interest at a rate not higher than the rate charged by the Ontario Municipal Improvement Corporation on the date of sale of such debenture. 3. A special equal annual rate sufficient to redeem the principal and interest on the debentures shall be levied upon the lands and roads as set forth in the Schedule in the report to be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected in each year for 5 years after the passing of this by -law. 4. For paying the amount of $4,790.00, being the amount assessed upon the lands and roads belonging to or controlled by the municipality, a special rate sufficient to pay the amount assessed plus interest thereon shall be levied upon the whole rateable property in the Municipality of Kincardine in 2011 to • be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected. 5. All assessments of $5,000.00 or less are payable in the first year in which the assessment is imposed. 6. This by -law shall come into full force and effect upon its final passage. 7. This by -law may be cited as the "MD #9 — Anness Drain — Branches A &B — 2011 By- Law ". READ a FIRST and SECOND TIME this 18 day of May, 2011. PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED this 18 day of May, 2011. • • �_ • L �ow.,a QP Mayor Clerk READ a THIRD TIME and FINALLY PASSED this I ?t day of k ,l , 2011 . ENACTED this 2 day of July , 201 1 . _ �a aQ0 4 ayor Clerk • /( BURNSIDE ITNE DIFFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLE] Engineer's Report Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branches A & B — 2011 Municipality of Kincardine Prepared By: R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 449 Josephine Street P.O. Box 10 Wingham ON NOG 2W0 Prepared for: Municipality of Kincardine April 29, 2011 File No: MCW179390 The material in this report reflects best judgement in light of the information available at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Municipality of Kincardine Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness, Branches A & B - 2011 April 29, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Foreword 1 1.1 Authorization 1 1.2 Objective 1 1.3 Recommendations Summary 1 1.4 Acknowledgements 1 2.0 Introduction 2 2.1 History 2 2.2 Petition for Drainage Works 2 2.3 Landowner Meetings 2 2.4 Existing Conditions 2 2.5 Environmental & Fisheries Issues 4 2.6 Engineer's Report 4 3.0 Description of Watershed 4 3.1 Location 4 3.2 Area 4 3.3 Boundary 5 3.4 Soils 5 3.5 Land Use 5 4.0 The Drainage Act, RSO 1990 5 5.0 Design Criteria 5 6.0 Design and Engineering Considerations 6 7.0 Proposed Work 7 7.1 Main Drain - Open 7 7.2 Branch A - Closed 7 7.3 Branch B - Closed 7 7.4 General Construction 8 7.5 Working Spaces and Access Routes 8 7.6 Change Orders 8 8.0 Environmental Considerations 8 9.0 Description of Appendices 9 9.1 Appendix A - Allowances 9 9.2 Appendix B - Cost Estimate 10 9.3 Appendices C and D - Assessments and Assessment Details 10 10.0 Maintenance 14 10.1 General 14 R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 10.2 Future Costs 15 10.3 Road Crossing 15 10.4 Connections to the Municipal Drain 15 Appendices A Allowances B Cost Estimate C Assessment Schedules D Assessment Details E Special Information to Tenderers & Specifications F SVCA Permit G Drawings — Plan — Main Drain (No. MCW179390 -1) — Plan — Branch A & B (No. MCW179390 -2) — Profile — Main Drain (No. MCW179390 -3) — Profile — Branch A (No. MCW179390 -4) — Profile — Branch B (No. MCW179390 -5) R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 NOMENCLATURE ac - acre (0.4047 ha.) A & I - assemble and install BJB — buried junction box CB - catchbasin CDT - concrete drain tile CSP - corrugated steel pipe c/w - complete with Diam. - diameter DICB — ditch inlet catchbasin D/S - downstream ea - each FL - fence Line FPPDT - filtered perforated plastic drainage tubing FTCB - flat top catchbasin H - horizontal ha - hectare (2.471 ac) JB - junction box km - kilometre I.s. - lump sum m - metre mm - millimetre m2 - square metre m3 - cubic metre O/H - overhead O/S - offset PDT - plastic drainage tubing PL - property line PPDT - perforated plastic drainage tubing RCSP - riveted corrugated steel pipe ROW - right of way S & I - supply and install SPDT - solid plastic drainage tubing Sta. - station (chainage) SWI - surface water inlet SWRSP - smoothwall rigid sewer pipe SWWSP - smoothwall welded steel pipe T - tonne (2205 pounds) U/G - underground U/S - upstream V — vertical R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 1 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 1.0 Foreword 1.1 Authorization The preparation of this Engineer's Report was authorized in a letter of instruction from the Clerk of the Municipality of Kincardine, dated December 4, 2009 when a Petition for Drainage Works by Owners (Petition) was submitted by the owner of East Part Lot 28 and Lot 29 Concession 11, in the geographic Township of Bruce. 1.2 Objective The objective of this report is to provide an under drainage outlet and an inlet for surface water for Lot 28 and Lot 29, Concession 11. 1.3 Recommendations Summary This Report includes the following recommendations: 1. Clean out and deepening of the existing Municipal Drain (MD) #9 - Anness. 2. The installation of two new tile branch drains from the existing MD # 9 - Anness, to provide a drainage outlet for Lots 28 and 29, Concession 11. A summary of the assessments for this project are as follows: Privately owned Agricultural Land $94,440 Privately owned non - Agricultural Land $ 670 Municipally owned Road Allowance $ 4,790 Total Estimated Assessments $99,900 1.4 Acknowledgements Burnside would like to acknowledge the assistance and co- operation of the landowners directly involved with this project, as well as the Municipality of Kincardine and their Municipal Staff. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 2 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 2.0 Introduction 2.1 History A report was prepared in 1956 by J.A. Howes, OLS. The report included the deepening of an existing channel from Lot 26, Concession 12 to the upstream end in Lot 30, Concession 10. This report and a subsequent appeal to the Court of Revision established the original watershed boundary for MD #9 - Anness. 2.2 Petition for Drainage Works This Report was initiated by a Petition submitted by the owner of East Part Lot 28 and Lot 29, Concession 11. 2.3 Landowner Meetings The on -site meeting was held on April 13, 2010 to discuss the Petition submitted by the landowner of East Part Lot 28 and 29, Concession 11. A second meeting was held on August 12, 2010 for the landowners within the affected watershed area of the proposed Branch to review the initial design and estimated costs for the drain. A third meeting was held on April 7, 2011 for all of the landowners within the watershed of MD #9 - Anness. 2.4 Existing Conditions 2.4.1 Lot 27, Concession 11 The owner of this property indicated at the April 2011 meeting that he would prefer to maintain the existing culvert crossing that he has installed in the open channel. The owner indicated that there were several tiles from his property that outlet into the existing drain. The landowner also indicated that he would prefer to have the spoil placed on the east side of the drain. 2.4.2 West Part Lot 28, Concession 11 At the initial on -site meeting, the owner of this property indicated that there were a number of older tiles that extended from the open channel, through his property and east into upstream lands. The tiles were not registered on the title of the land as mutual agreement drains, but rather a "gentleman's agreement" to share the costs of the installation of the tiles. The landowner indicated during the August 2010 meeting that R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 3 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 there was a low area in the middle section of his property, as well as a low area at the north end of this property. At the April 2011 meeting, the owner indicated that he had installed a tile along the bush at the north end of his property to provide drainage to that area. 2.4.3 East Part Lot 28 and Lot 29, Concession 11 At the on -site meeting in April 2010, the owner of this property indicated that he plans to install systematic under drainage on his property and requires an outlet to MD #9 - Anness prior to the installation. At the August 2010 site meeting the landowner provided insight to the low area located at the north end of Lot 28, Concession 11. As requested, an additional survey of the area was completed after the meeting and as a result a second tile branch was added to the original design. The landowner indicated after the August meeting that he planned on creating surface water inlets throughout his property and at the Concession Road. These inlets would connect to his under drainage tiles that would then be connected to the proposed Branches of the Municipal Drain at the west property line. 2.4.4 Lot 30, Concession 11 The ownership of this property changed from the time of the first on -site meeting to the last meeting held in April 2011. Prior to the April 2011 meeting the new landowner was contacted to discuss the costs required to extend the Municipal Drain to the Lot 29/30, Concession 11 property line. A preliminary cost estimate was provided to both the landowner of Lot 29, as well as the landowner of Lot 30, Concession 11. Both landowners indicated that they did not want to extend the Municipal Drain to their common property line and that they would negotiate with each other privately on drainage matters. 2.4.5 Lot 30, Concession 10 The ownership of this property also changed from the time of the first on -site meeting to the last meeting held in April 2011. In December 2010 a letter describing the process and preliminary design was sent to the landowner. The letter asked the landowner to indicate if he required an outlet for his property or if he had any concerns with the preliminary design. No written or verbal reply was received, however; at the April 2011 meeting the landowner indicated that he intended to drain some of his property south towards the open channel through the bush. He also indicated concerns with the open R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 4 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 drain involving beaver dams. The Drainage Superintendent stated he would follow up and address those concerns through regular maintenance. 2.4.6 Roads Department, Municipality of Kincardine The Municipal representatives indicated that they had no concerns or requirements for drainage at this time. 2.5 Environmental & Fisheries Issues When a new Engineer's Report is prepared for an existing open Municipal Drain, the process requires that a review of the work and subsequent approvals be obtained from the local Conservation Authority (CA) and /or Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). For the MD # 9 - Anness, the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA) indicated that the drain is subject to the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 169/06). Accordingly a permit is required from the SVCA to complete the work on the open channel and is included in Appendix F of this report. 2.6 Engineer's Report As a result of the information gathered during the on -site surveys and the discussions at the various meetings, the proposed works and costs contained herein are intended to reflect the requirements of the stakeholders. Details of the proposed work are described in this Report, its Appendices and on the Plans and Profiles. 3.0 Description of Watershed 3.1 Location The Municipal Drain is located in the north east section of the geographic Township of Bruce, Lots 26 to 30, Concessions 9 through 12, Municipality of Kincardine. The proposed Branch A is approximately 364 m in length, while Branch B is approximately 358 m in length. The location of both Branches and the Main Drain are shown on the enclosed Plan. 3.2 Area The entire watershed affected by the Main Drain is approximately 305 ha (754 acres). Approximately 32 ha (77 acres) are within the Branch A watershed and 86 ha (211 acres) are located in the Branch B watershed. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 5 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 3.3 Boundary The watershed boundaries for the Main Drain, Branch A and Branch B are indicated on the Plans. The previous report prepared in 1956 was referenced for determining the exterior watershed boundary. Topographical information obtained from the SVGA, land owner comments at the meetings, including areas drained into or out of the watershed, as well as a visual inspection of the site were used for the calculation of the drainage areas. 3.4 Soils The Bruce County Soils Maps indicate that the predominate soil types in this watershed are Elderslie silt loam with some pockets of Chesley silt clay loam. All soils are a lacustrine having imperfect to poor natural drainage with smooth to gently sloping topography. The majority of soils within the area have an agricultural capability rating of 100% Class 1 with no limitations; however there is also an area with a Class 2 rating which has a limitation due to excess water. 3.5 Land Use The land within this drainage area is primarily used for agricultural purposes such as cash crops and pasture. There are also some areas of bush as can be seen on the Plan. 4.0 The Drainage Act, RSO 1990 This Report is being prepared in accordance with Section 4 of the Drainage Act. The area requiring drainage is the East Part of Lot 28 and Lot 29, Concession 11, in the geographic Township of Bruce, as it is in need of an under drainage outlet. At the initial on -site meeting, the other landowners were asked if they had a need for a drainage outlet. None of the landowners indicated a need for drainage. It was determined that the Petition submitted for drainage works was valid on the basis that all of the owners in the area requiring drainage had signed it, in accordance with Section 4 (1) (a) of the Act. 5.0 Design Criteria The applicable sections of the "Design and Construction Guidelines for Work Under the Drainage Act ", as prepared by the Government of Ontario, and the applicable sections of the "Drainage Guide for Ontario ", as published by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 6 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 Food, have been used for the design of the Branches for this Municipal Drain and will also be used for the construction. Based on the watershed boundaries established in this report, Branch A and Branch B have been designed with a drainage co- efficient of 12.7 mm (one half inch) in 24 hours for the under drainage requirements of cleared, worked, agricultural land and a drainage co- efficient of 12.7 mm (one half inch) in 24 hours for the surface water requirements of all land within the watershed area. No detailed design or drainage co- efficients were applied to the open Main Drain. The proposed new ditchbottom gradient provides a clean out and a slight deepening to obtain an outlet for the two Branches. The design parameters were discussed at the April 2011 landowners meeting and general consensus to these design coefficients was obtained. It should be noted that at times of extreme rainfall events, surface water may overload the two tile drains and flooding may still occur in the area of the two branches, as well as the Main Drain. 6.0 Design and Engineering Considerations It is good engineering practice to maintain 1 metre of cover on tile drains through a worked agricultural field and adequate separation from wooded areas. This practice was explained to the landowners at the meetings. It is also good practice to have a minimum of 0.3 m of outfall from a tile outlet invert to the bottom of an open channel. At the August site meeting the landowners provided insight to the low area located at the north end of Lot 28, Concession 11. As requested, an additional survey of the area was completed after the meeting and as a result a second branch was added to the original design. Branch A will provide an under drainage outlet for the north part of Lots 28 and 29, as well as an additional surface water inlet for the low Tying area that was identified as a concern by the landowners for both parts of Lot 28, Concession 11. The use of grassed waterways was discussed with the landowners either at the site meetings or during follow up conversations. The owner of east part Lot 28 and Lot 29, Concession 11 indicated that during his tiling installation he had planned on creating surface water inlets throughout his property and at the Concession Road and therefore did not have the need at this time to create a grassed waterway as part of the Municipal Drain. The owner of the west part of Lot 28, Concession 11 was not interested in a grassed waterway and preferred that only a tile cross his land. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 7 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 The landowners upstream of Lot 29, Concession 11, namely Lot 30, Concession 10 and 11 were contacted with regards to whether a tile needed to be extended to their property line to provide an under drainage outlet. The landowners indicated that they were not interested in extending the drain to their property lines at this time. It was discussed during the site meetings that if an outlet were required, the more efficient time to install it would be prior to the installation of systematic tiling on Lot 29. 7.0 Proposed Work In accordance with Section 8 (1) (a) of the Drainage Act, the Specifications, Plan and Profiles of the proposed work are contained in Appendix E and G of this Report and provide complete details of the entire project. This section of the Report is intended to provide only a very brief description of the work on the various parts of the Drain. 7.1 Main Drain - Open The main channel will be cleaned and deepened between the downstream end of the drain and the Concession Road culvert. The channel will be protected with rip rap wherever tile outlets are encountered during the clean out. The spoil will be spread on the east side of the drain beyond a 3 m width next to the drain to the specifications indicated in Appendix E. The existing private culvert on Lot 27, Concession 11 is not considered part of the Municipal Drain and will be left in place for the landowner to continue to use. The costs of the tile outlets, if greater than eight per property, will be assessed directly to the landowner. 7.2 Branch A - Closed A corrugated steel outlet pipe and concrete drainage tile will be installed from the channel through Lot 27 and across the west part of Lot 28. Catch basins will be installed at each property line to allow for under drainage connection of upstream lands and to provide a surface water inlet to the new drain. 7.3 Branch B — Closed Due to shallow cover, a HDPE pipe will be installed from the open channel through Lot 27 to the property line. A concrete drainage tile will be installed across the west part of Lot 28. Catch basins will be installed at each property line to allow for under drainage connection of upstream lands and to provide a surface water inlet to the new drain. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 8 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 7.4 General Construction Existing tiles encountered during the installation of Branch A & B will be reconnected and included as part of the construction costs. Any private tiles that need to be relocated due to the installation of the Municipal Drain will also be included as part of the construction costs. However; the costs for any private tile connections to the junction boxes will be assessed directly to the landowner. 7.5 Working Spaces and Access Routes The working space and access routes being provided to the Contractor to undertake this work are described in Appendix E - Special Information to Tenderers on the chart entitled "Working Space ". This working space shall also be available for future maintenance. Access to the working space is to be confirmed by the Contractor with the engineer prior to commencement of construction. Appropriate allowances have been provided to the various properties in this regard. Access to this drain for the Contractor will be from the Concession Road, in either Lot 27 for the open Main Drain and in the West Part of Lot 28 for the closed Branch A and B. 7.6 Change Orders If unforeseen circumstances are encountered after the adoption of this Report, the engineer may issue Change Orders as required to have the works properly constructed. 8.0 Environmental Considerations Since a permit is required from the SVCA to complete the proposed work on MD #9 - Anness, they were contacted at the onset of the project and a preliminary design was submitted in December 2010 for their review and approval. SVCA provided comments regarding the proposed design. A final design, along with a permit application, was submitted to the SCVA in April 2011 addressing the initial concerns raised by the CA which included: • Construction in the channel should be between July 15 and September 30 • Minimize bank reshaping. • Side slopes at 2:1, although 1.5:1 may be feasible. • Establishment of in- channel sediment and erosion control measures, including sediment traps and rock check dams. • Maintain 10 -15% of culvert embedment in the existing channel. These comments and concerns have been addressed in the final design of the drain and the permit is included in Appendix F. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 9 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 At this time there does not appear to be any species at risk within this area that would require special consideration under the Species at Risk Act (SARA). Accordingly, with the incorporation of the protective measures identified, it is not anticipated that this project will create any significant adverse environmental effects. 9.0 Description of Appendices Four of the appendices to this Report, namely Appendix A - Allowances, Appendix B - Cost Estimate, Appendix C — Assessment Schedules and Appendix D — Assessment Details are described in the following sub - sections. 9.1 Appendix A - Allowances 9.1.1 General In accordance with Section 8(1) (d) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix provides a breakdown of the allowances provided under Sections 29 and 30 of the Act. Allowances will be deducted from total assessments in accordance with Section 62(3) of the Act. The land and crop values used for these calculations were determined in consultation with Farm Credit Canada and a representative of Agricorp respectively, and are described in the following sections. The results of the allowance calculations under each Section of the Act can be seen within this Appendix. Details regarding working space can be found in the Special Information to Tenderers. 9.1.2 Section 29 — Right of Way The Act states: "The engineer in the report shall estimate and allow in money to the owner of any land that it is necessary to use, (a) for the construction or improvement of a drainage works; (b) for the disposal of material removed from drainage works; (c) as a site for a pumping station to be used in connection with a drainage works; or (d) as a means of access to any such pumping station, if, in the opinion of the engineer, such right of way is sufficient for the purposes of the drainage works, the value of any such land or the damages, if any, thereto, and shall include such sums in the estimates of the cost of the construction, improvement, repair or maintenance of the drainage works R.S.O. 1990, s. 29." A base value of $9,884 per hectare ($4,000 /acre) for workable, agricultural land has been used to calculate the allowances for all land taken or right -of -way given in this Report. For the main drain a 1 m width has been provided on the east side of the drain to allow for any side bank removal that may be required during the clean out and deepening of the channel. The value of land within the bush area, namely Lot 26 and R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 10 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 Lot 27, Concession 12 has been reduced by a factor of 0.5. Allowances have also been provided to the properties where a right -of -way is required for a new closed drain. The value for closed drains was reduced to one third of the land value and was applied to a 10 m width since the land can still be used for agricultural purposes. 9.1.3 Section 30 — Damages The Act states: "The engineer shall determine the amount to be paid to persons entitled thereto for damage, if any, to ornamental trees, lawns, fences, lands and crops occasioned by the disposal of material removed from a drainage works and shall include such sums in the estimates of the cost of the construction, improvement, repair or maintenance of the drainage works. R.S.O. 1990, c. D.17, s. 30." The allowances for damage to lands and crops have been calculated using a base value of $1,235.50 per hectare ($500 /acre) of workable, agricultural land. A width of 3 metres for the working space next to the channel and an additional 9 metres to spread the spoil on the east side of the channel has been included. The area for spreading spoil in the bush has been reduced to a 5 m width, since the spoil can be spread thicker in this area. For the tile drains, a 20 m width has been provided for damages, as well as an allowance for a 6 m access route to each of the branch drains from the Concession Road along the west part of Lot 28. 9.2 Appendix B — Cost Estimate In accordance with Section 8(1) (b) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix provides a breakdown of the total estimated cost of the proposed work including all materials, construction, administration and allowances. The total estimated cost for this project is $99,900. 9.3 Appendices C and D — Assessments and Assessment Details 9.3.1 General In accordance with Section 8(1) (c) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix is the distribution of the total estimated cost over the lands and roads involved. These assessments are made in accordance with Sections 22, 23, 24 and 26 of the Act. Affected private lands that are agricultural within the meaning of the Act may be eligible for a grant through the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The Engineering and Administration costs were assessed out over the entire drain as a percentage of the construction costs and then a reduction factor was applied to the Main Drain due to the amount of engineering that was required. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 11 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 9.3.2 Sections 22 and 23 Section 22 of the Act states: "Lands, roads, buildings, utilities or other structures that are increased in value or are more easily maintained as a result of the construction, improvement, maintenance or repair of a drainage works may be assessed for benefit. R.S.O. 1990, c. D.17, s. 22." Section 23 of the Act states: "(1) Lands and roads that use a drainage works as an outlet, or for which, when the drainage works is constructed or improved, an improved outlet is provided either directly or indirectly through the medium of any other drainage works or of a swale, ravine, creek or watercourse, may be assessed for outlet liability. (2) lf, from any land or road, water is artificially caused by any means to flow upon and injure any other land or road, the land or road from which the water is caused to flow may be assessed for injuring liability with respect to a drainage works to relieve the injury so caused to such other land or road. (3) The assessment for outlet liability and injuring liability provided for in subsections (1) and (2) shall be based upon the volume and rate of flow of the water artificially caused to flow upon the injured land or road or into the drainage works from the lands and roads liable for such assessments. (4) The owners of the lands and roads made liable to assessment only under subsection (1) or (2) shall neither count for nor against the petition required by section 4 unless within the area therein described. R.S.O. 1990, c. D.17, s. 23." The costs have been assessed to all of the affected lands and roads, in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Act, generally following the Todgham Method'. This is a method or system of determining assessments that is accepted by the drainage engineers as being fair and equitable. The basics of this method are explained here, whereas the details of the assessments for this Drain are included in Appendix D. For the open Main Drain the costs were assessed as 100% outlet since the work was considered primarily as a clean out of the channel. (a) Equivalent Areas — In order to conform to Section 23(3) of the Act, an "equivalent area factor" was applied to all lands within the drainage area. This factor is established for each parcel of land within the drainage area and is dependent on the particular characteristics of that land, the prime characteristics being land use and topography. In this way "...the volume and rate of flow of water artificially caused to flow...into the drainage works..." are established on a relative basis for "...the lands and roads liable for such assessments." The equivalent area factors for this Drain are as follows; under drainage land only 0.33, woodlands 0.5, agricultural land 1.0, residential lands 1.0, gravel roads 3.0 and paved roads 4.0. Using this information, an equivalent area summary table is prepared for the entire drainage area. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 12 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 (b) Sections of the Drain — Based on sub - drainage areas and property lines, the subject Drain or Drains are divided into various Sections for assessment purposes, normally with Section 1 being at the downstream end. (c) Costs for each Section — The total project cost for each section is calculated and includes all costs, such as; materials, construction, allowances, and administration. The total of these sectional costs must equal the total project cost including any special assessments made in accordance with Sections 24 and 26 of the Act. The sections and the associated costs are shown on the Sectional Costs table in Appendix D. (d) Benefit Assessment — To completely understand the assessment process, the reader must be aware of the definition of "benefit" contained in The Act. Standard practice is to make an assessment for benefit only to those properties upon which the work is actually done or to the properties adjacent to where the work is actually done, when the drain is located on or near the boundary between one or more properties. (e) Outlet Liability Assessment — An understanding of "outlet liability ", as defined in The Act, is also required to comprehend the assessment process. Standard practice is to make an assessment for outlet liability to any and all lands and roads that are within the drainage area since, in some manner, water from those lands will use all or part of the Drain as an outlet. (f) Direct Outlet Assessment — This term is used to describe the assessment for outlet made to those lands within each section of the Drain that outlet directly into that section. For example, if there are 15 equivalent hectares within the sub - drainage area of Section 3 of the Drain, these 15 equivalent hectares gain direct outlet to the Drain somewhere within the length of Section 3 and shall be assessed for the outlet obtained within that section. This assessment is not separately defined in the Act and is usually included with benefit when assessments are calculated. (g) Variation of Assessments throughout the length of the Drain — When engineers calculate assessments, they must decide (1) what portion of the cost of each section will be assessed as benefit and direct outlet to the land upon which the Drain is being constructed and (2) what portion will be assessed as outlet to the lands and roads upstream of that section. It is generally accepted that the benefit and direct outlet portion of a downstream section is comparatively low, since most of the capacity of the Drain is being provided as outlet for the upstream lands. Conversely then, the benefit and direct outlet portion of an upstream section is normally high, since most of the capacity there is being provided for the land upon which the Drain is being constructed. Therefore, normally, for a downstream section of the Drain, the portion of the cost assessed as benefit and direct outlet is low and the portion assessed as outlet is high; while, for an upstream section of the Drain, the portion of the cost assessed as benefit and direct outlet is high, and the portion assessed as outlet is low. Taken to the extreme, that is to the last upstream property in the drainage area, all of the cost of any work done on that property would be assessed as benefit and direct outlet, since there are no other lands upstream thereof that can be assessed for outlet. In this case, since much of the work can be considered as 'maintenance', this theory may not apply exactly as described here. (h) Actual Assessment Calculations for a Typical Section of the Drain — The process used for the calculation of the assessments for each section of the Drain is generally the same. A brief description of this process follows. Reference to a R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 13 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 typical "Sectional Assessment Worksheet" should assist the reader with this description. 1) Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S — This figure is the cumulative outlet assessment per equivalent hectare that is brought forward from the previous section (where applicable). 2) Total Section Cost — This is the total sectional cost, as previously explained. 3) Specific Costs — These are costs for specific items that are considered to apply only to a particular property or road and not to all the lands within the drainage area. These costs can be Section 24 Assessments, Section 26 Assessments, or "specific" benefit assessments. These specific assessments are then posted to the particular property or road in the Summary Table and the total of them is deducted from the Total Section Cost to leave the "Remainder to Assess ". 4) Normal Outlet — At this point in the process, the engineer uses professional judgement and experience to establish the percentage of this "Remainder to Assess" that should be assessed as Normal Outlet to the lands and roads upstream of this section. The balance will then be the amount to be assessed as Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet to the lands and roads in this section. 5) Equivalent Area Drained — This is the equivalent area that is upstream of the subject section of the Drain. The portion of the cost that has been determined to be assessed as outlet for this section is then divided by this equivalent area. This results in the amount per equivalent hectare that is to be assessed as outlet to those upstream lands and roads for this section. This amount is then transferred to the "Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U /S" item at the bottom of the worksheet. 6) Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet — This figure is the amount remaining to be assessed after subtracting the outlet assessment amount. 7) Direct Outlet — At this stage, the engineer uses professional judgement and experience to establish the length of this section of the Drain that is used by each parcel of land within the section. The calculation, as shown on the worksheet, is then made to determine the "Direct Outlet" assessment for each on these parcels. These "Direct Outlet" assessments are then transferred to the Summary Table. The "Total of Direct Outlet" amount is then subtracted from the previous sub -total to provide the amount "Remaining for Normal Benefit ". 8) Remaining for Normal Benefit — This figure is the Normal Benefit assessment that is levied against the lands within this section, again, based on the engineer's professional judgment and experience. It is then transferred to the appropriate location in the Summary Table. 9) Summary Table — In Section — This is the listing of the parcels of land within this section of the Drain. The assessments determined for each of these parcels are posted in this table. 10) Summary Table — U/S of Section — This is where the properties that use only this section of the Drain, and those downstream, are listed and the outlet assessments applicable to each are posted. These assessments are calculated by multiplying the equivalent area of each by the Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U /S. 11) Sub -Total — This is the total of the assessments levied within this section of the Drain. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 14 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 12) Cumulative Total — This is the total of all the assessments levied to this point on the Drain. (i) Initial Reconciliation of Total Assessments — When all sectional assessments have been completed, they are reconciled and the totals established per property. (j) Final Fairness Test — The engineer then reviews the reconciled totals from above, comparing each one with all of the others, to ensure that, in his opinion, each property has been dealt with fairly as compared with every other property. If any unfairness appears, this is adjusted out until the engineer is satisfied that all assessments are fair and in balance, having in mind the actual conditions in the field. (k) Schedule of Assessments — When the engineer is satisfied with the final assessments, the schedule of assessments is prepared. This is included in Appendix C of this Report. 10.0 Maintenance 10.1 General While the Municipality of Kincardine will be responsible for the maintenance of MD #9 — Anness, Main Drain, Branch A and B after the construction is complete, the sections of the Drainage Act dealing with obstruction of, damage and injury to a Municipal Drain, namely Sections 80 and 82 respectively, are brought to the attention of the landowners. As can be seen from these Sections, both the landowners and the Municipality have responsibilities to ensure that a Municipal Drain is properly maintained and not abused. Proper maintenance of the existing and proposed works described herein will be necessary to ensure that all parts continue to function properly. The maintenance and integrity of open drains and grassed waterways are especially important since these channels often provide an outlet for either the closed portions of the Municipal Drain or for private drainage systems. This maintenance should include regular inspections and necessary work along the entire length of the Drain and should ensure that all structures, tiles, open drains, sediment basins and grassed waterways remain unobstructed by debris or sediment and are cleaned on a regular basis. As well, any areas of washout, settlement, or erosion should be attended to immediately. Landowners involved with this Drain should make regular inspections of the portion on their property and immediately report any problems to the Municipality so that the Drainage Superintendent can take proper action. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc Municipality of Kincardine 15 Engineer's Report, Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 10.2 Future Costs For the Main Drain a new maintenance schedule has been prepared. The theory used for the preparation of this Schedule was based on equivalent land areas, taking into consideration the length of drain used by each parcel, and then converted to percentages. This Maintenance Schedule has been included in Appendix C for the main drain and any future maintenance costs shall be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Drainage Act using this schedule. For Branch A and B, any future maintenance costs shall be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Drainage Act using "only the outlet assessment" portion of the Assessments in Appendix C, until such time as this schedule may be adjusted in accordance with the Act. 10.3 Road Crossing The road crossings that are part of the Main Drain shall be maintained entirely at the expense of the Roads Department for the Municipality of Kincardine, either by the Municipality or by the Drainage Superintendent. 10.4 Connections to the Municipal Drain During or after construction, new private tile drains shall not be connected directly to the Municipal Drain tile. Any such connections to the Municipal Drain tile must be made at the approved locations indicated in this Report, using the plugged inlets provided in the precast concrete structures. Direct connections will not be permitted to the new Municipal Drain tile by the owners or their Contractors unless approved by the Drainage Superintendent. Connections not approved by the Drainage Superintendent may be removed at the expense of the owner of the land upon which the connection was made. Respectfully submitted, R. J. Burnside & Associates Lt a.Essir J. C.Ti Jeremy C. Taylor, P. Eng. 11 © ' ` R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 17939 Anness MD Final Report.doc A BURNS IDE rTsE OiFEERRNSE t6 OUR PEOPLE] Appendix A Allowances -A1 APPENDIX A - ALLOWANCES Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Lot Roll Right of Way Damages Conc. or Owner Number (Sect. 29) (Sect. 30) Totals Part 12 27 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -145 160 160 320 11 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 1,730 2,160 3,890 11 West Part 28 M.H. White 3 -093 1,650 2,080 3,730 11 East Part 28 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 100 100 TOTAL ALLOWANCES $ 3,540 $ 4,500 $ 8,040 - A2 - SECTION 29 - LAND TAKEN ALLOWANCE CALCULATIONS Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April2011 Land Value $ / hectare 9,884.00 $ / acre 4,000.00 Section Owner Desc'n Sta. Sta. Length Width Factor Allow (m) (m) (m) (m) ($) Main Drain M1 J. & C. McCulloch Con 12, Lot 26 0 75 75 1 0.50 40 J. & C. McCulloch Con 12, Lot 27 75 315 240 1 0.50 120 J.A. & J.F. Allen Con 11, Lot 27 315 1342 1027 1 1.00 1020 TOTAL $ 1,180 Branch A Al J.A. & J.F. Allen Con 11, Lot 27 0 141 141 10 0.33 460 A2 M.H. White Con 11, Pt Lot 28 141 364 223 10 0.33 730 TOTAL $ 1,190 Branch B B1 J.A. & J.F. Allen Con 11, Lot 27 0 77 77 10 0.33 250 B2 M.H. White Con 11, Pt Lot 28 77 358 281 10 0.33 920 TOTAL $ 1,170 -A3 SECTION 30 - DAMAGE ALLOWANCE CALCULATIONS Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April2011 Damage $ / hectare 1,235.50 $ / acre 500.00 Section Owner Desc'n Sta. Sta. Length Width Factor Allow (m) (m) (m) (m) ($) Main Drain M1 J. & C. McCulloch Open Channel 0 75 75 8 0.50 40 J. & C. McCulloch 75 315 240 8 0.50 120 J.A. & J.F. Allen 315 1342 1027 12 1.00 1520 TOTAL$ 1680 Branch A Closed Drain Al J.A. & J.F. Allen Con 11, Lot 27 Working Space 0 141 141 20 1.00 350 Access at Outlet 0 20 20 1.00 50 A2 M.H. White Con 11, Pt Lot 28 Working Space 141 364 223 20 1.00 550 Access from Concession Road 500 1000 500 6 1.00 370 Access at JB 364 20 20 1.00 50 A2 Bavik Farms Inc. Conc 11, Pt 28 Access at JB 364 20 20 1.00 50 TOTAL$ 1420 Branch B Closed Drain B1 J.A. & J.F. Allen Con 11, Lot 27 Working Space 0 77 77 20 1.00 190 Access at Outlet 77 20 20 1.00 50 B2 M.H. White Con 11, Pt Lot 28 Working Space 77 358 281 20 1.00 690 Access from Concession Road 0 500 500 6 1.00 370 Access at JB 358 20 20 1.00 50 B2 Bavik Farms Inc. Conc 11, Pt 28 Access at JB 358 20 20 1.00 50 TOTAL$ 1400 TOTAL$ $ 4,500 BURNS 1TI[ DIFFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLE} Appendix B Cost Estimate - B - APPENDIX B - COST ESTIMATE Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 CONSTRUCTION Main Drain 1342 m of open channel clean out with spoil spreading $ 10,070 Branch A 135 m x 400 mm CDT with topsoil stripping and corrugated steel pipe outlet with rip rap $ 6,910 1 DICB complete with berm and rip rap $ 1,720 223 m x 300 mm CDT with topsoil stripping $ 6,840 1 DICB complete with berm and rip rap $ 1,610 Branch B 77 m x 600 mm HDPE with topsoil stripping outlet complete with rip rap $ 8,350 1 DICB complete with berm and rip rap $ 2,480 281 m x 450 mm CDT with topsoil stripping $ 13,150 1 DICB complete with berm and rip rap $ 1,610 Provisional items including rip rap and special installation techniques $ 5,500 TOTAL ESTIMATED MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION $ 58,240 ADMINISTRATION - Engineering - Survey, Design, Allowance Calculations, Cost Estimate, Assessments, Drawings, Specifications, Special Information to Tenderers, etc. $ 15,000 - Engineering - Dealing with SVCA and Environmental Concerns $ 2,000 - Report Preparation, Copying & Binding $ 2,500 - Attendance at Meetings, including Meeting to Consider $ 2,500 - Letting of Contract $ 2,000 - Contract Administration $ 5,500 - Allowances $ 8,040 - Interest & Taxes & Permits $ 3,340 - Contingency $ 780 TOTAL ESTIMATED ADMINISTRATION $ 41,660 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 99,900 Note: The above summary contains estimates of costs only. It is emphasized that these estimates do NOT include costs to defend the drainage report and procedures should appeals be filed with the Court of Revision, Drainage Tribunal and/or Drainage Referee. Should additional costs be incurred, unless otherwise directed, the additional costs will be distributed in a prorata fashion over the assessment contained in the Schedule of Assessments for Construction as may be varied under the Drainage Act. ih BURNSIDE VINE DIFFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLE] Appendix C Assessment Schedules - C1 - APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENTS MAIN DRAIN - OPEN Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Lot Affected Benefit Outlet Conc. or Owner Roll No. Area Assess't Assess't Totals Part (Ha.) (Sect.22) (Sect.23) Lands Conc 9 Lot 29 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -266 24.6 930 930 Conc 9 Lot 30 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -267 1.2 40 40 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3- 045 -10 34.0 2250 2250 Conc 10 Part Lot 28 * P.G. & B.J. Burns 3 -045 1.4 90 90 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3 -046 40.5 2170 2170 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 3 -047 39.7 1780 1780 Conc 10 W 1/2 Lot 31 R. & D. Dufton 3 -048 12.1 730 730 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 37.7 2480 2480 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 20.3 1290 1290 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 59.5 3790 3790 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 * K. Vallee 3 -095 1.1 70 70 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 15.0 960 960 Conc 12 Lot 26 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -143 0.7 50 50 Conc 12 Lot 27 W 1/2 Lot 28 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -145 7.7 260 260 Conc 12 E 1/2 Lot 28 R. Caldwell 3 -147 2.8 90 90 Conc 12 Lot 29 R. Caldwell 3 -148 2.4 80 80 Roads Side road 30 Kincardine 2.0 390 390 Concession 10 Kincardine 2.8 720 720 TOTAL ON LANDS 305.4 $ - $ 18,170 $ 18,170 Notes: (1) All private lands are Agricultural, within the meaning of the Drainage Act except properties denoted with * - C2 - APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENTS BRANCH A - CLOSED Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Lot Affected Benefit Outlet Conc. or Owner Roll No. Area Assess't Assess't Totals Part (Ha.) (Sect.22) (Sect.23) Lands Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 1.5 $ 1,160 $ 190 $ 1,350 Conc 11 West 112 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 4.5 $ 4,115 $ 2,500 $ 6,615 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 20.2 $ 1,185 $ 20,010 $ 21,195 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 5.0 $ - $ 5,060 $ 5,060 TOTAL ON LANDS 31.2 $ 6,460 $ 27,760 $ 34,220 Notes: (1) All private lands are Agricultural, within the meaning of the Drainage Act except properties denoted with * - C3 - APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENTS BRANCH B - CLOSED Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Lot Affected Benefit Outlet Conc. or Owner Roll No. Area Assess't Assess't Totals Part (Ha.) (Sect.22) (Sect.23) Lands Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 0.6 $ 1,469 $ 31 $ 1,500 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 8.8 $ 5,315 $ 2,330 $ 7,645 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 39.3 $ 1,125 $ 18,910 $ 20,035 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 * K. Vallee 3 -095 1.1 $ - $ 510 $ 510 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 10.0 $ - $ 4,810 $ 4,810 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farm 3-045-10 2.0 $ - $ 650 $ 650 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farm 3-046 12.0 $ - $ 3,870 $ 3,870 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 3 -047 10.0 $ - $ 4,810 $ 4,810 Roads Concession 2 Kincardine 7.6 $ - $ 3,680 $ 3,680 TOTAL ON LANDS 91.4 $ 7,909 $ 39,601 $ 47,510 Notes: (1) All private lands are Agricultural, within the meaning of the Drainage Act except properties denoted with - C4 - APPENDIX C - MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE MAIN DRAIN - OPEN Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Lot Affected Maintenance Conc. or Owner Roll No. Area Assessment Part (Ha.) Schedule Lands Conc 9 Lot 29 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -266 24.6 8% Conc 9 Lot 30 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -267 1.2 0.3% Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3- 045 -10 34.0 13% Conc 10 Part Lot 28 * P.G. & B.J. Burns 3 -045 1.4 0.5% Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3 -046 40.5 20% Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 3 -047 39.7 20% Conc 10 W 1/2 Lot 31 R. & D. Dufton 3 -048 12.1 9% Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 37.7 6.8% Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 20.3 4% Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 59.5 9% Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 * K. Vallee 3 -095 1.1 0.2% Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 15.0 2% Conc 12 Lot 26 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -143 0.7 0.1% Conc 12 Lot 27 W 1/2 Lot 28 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -145 7.7 0.2% Conc 12 E 1/2 Lot 28 R. Caldwell 3 -147 2.8 0.1% Conc 12 Lot 29 R. Caldwell 3 -148 2.4 0.1% Roads Side road 30 Kincardine 2.0 4.7% Concession 10 Kincardine 2.8 2% TOTAL ON LANDS 305.4 100% Notes: (1) All private lands are Agricultural, within the meaning of the Drainage Act except properties denoted with * t BURNS I DE [TUE 31if ERENCE t8 OUR PEOPLE} Appendix D Assessment Details � +5 'Y � � Z°dYr R F s - �df i�_.j, i f # 3 ' . . -035 4111 v,47 ORDER O 92 ,- � FEBRUARY 1992 } AGDEX 557 , s UNDERSTANDING DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT (Revision of Factsheet, "Understanding Drainage Assessment," May 1976) Sid Vander Veen, P. Eng. Resources Management Branch The Drainage Act provides a legal procedure by which an The engineer's report is presented to Council, who then "area requiring drainage" may have an outlet drain con- notifies all persons assessed and calls a special meeting strutted to dispose of excess water. where the report is considered. General objections to the The drainage work is initiated by interested individuals report may be raised at this time. At this meeting signatures within an area requiring drainage" who will benefit from may be added or removed from the petition and this deter- the construction of the drain. A petition form, obtained from mines if the project will continue. Unresolved problems, the municipal clerk, is signed by interested landowners. In depending on the subject, may be appealed to the Court of order to be valid or sufficient, the petition must be signed by Revision, the Ontario Drainage Tribunal or the Drainage Referee. Details on appeal procedures may be found in The the majority of the owners in the "area requiring drainage" Drainage Act* or in Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and or by owners that represent at least 60% of the lands in this Food Factsheet, Drainage Legislation. area. The "area requiring drainage" is usually described by lot and concession, or other legal Iand description. By tak- The engineer's report includes two important items: ing this action, it is presumed that the owners signing the 1. The estimated cost of the work: No matter how indi- petition have made a decision that the drain will be of bene- vidual assessments are arrived at, this total estimated fit to them and that the probable cost will be lower than the cost must always be equal to the total amount anticipated benefits. The initial benefit -cost decision is assessed, otherwise the work cannot proceed. made at this paint by the landowners, not the engineer or 2. The assessment liability: This may be spread over Council• several pages if an owner owns several parcels of The petition is presented to and considered by Council. land and if there are branch drains. It may be sum - If the petition represents a proper "area requiring drainage ", marized. that is a real drainage basin, and appears to be valid, the Let us examine the obligations regarding this assess - Council may decide to proceed. Council then notifies each meet. of the petitioners of this decision as well as any other munic- ipality affected and the Iocal Conservation Authority and the Responsibilities Under Common Law Ministry of Natural Resources. A natural watercourse is defined generally as a stream of Council then appoints an engineer. The engineer is an water which flows along a defined channel, with bed and employee of Council, hired to design this specific drain. banks, for a sufficient time to give it substantial existence. Under The Drainage Act, Section 9(2), the engineer is This may include streams that dry up periodically. required to hold an on -site meeting to determine (1) the area A riparian landowner (owner of lands that abut upon a requiring drainage, (2) if the petition is valid, (3) the natural watercourse) has the right to drain his or her lands drainage needs of the area. The engineer is then required "to • into the natural stream, but may not bring water in from make an examination of the area requiring drainage as another watershed. He or she can collect water in ditches described in the petition and to prepare a report which shall and drains and discharge it into the watercourse even though include, it results in an increase in volume and rate of flow. (a) plans, profiles and specifications of the drainage Where a natural watercourse becomes a part of a drain, it works; is no banger a natural watercourse. When this occurs, the (b) a description of the area requiring drainage; riparian rights, as described earlier, are lost. (c) an estimate of the total cost thereof; Surface water not flowing in a natural watercourse (i.e. (d) an assessment of the amount or proportion of the not having discernible bed and banks) has no right of cost of the works to be assessed against every parcel drainage; an owner of lower land may, at his or her own of land and road for benefit, outlet liability and injur- choice, either allow the water from higher land to flow over ing liability; it or by dams or banks, keep such water off his or her prop- (e) allowances, if any, to be paid to the owners of land affected by the drainage works and * The Drainage Acv 'nay he found in the Revised Statutes of Ontario 1980. Chapter 126, available in most public libraries. (f) such other matters as are provided for under this individual copies may be purchased front the Ontario Government Act." Bookstore, 880 Bat' Street, Toronto. erty. No owner has the right to collect such surface water by An owner has no responsibility for work done upstream ditches or drains and discharge it on lands of another. He or from his or her property unless the work provides a benefit she has a responsibility to take this water to a sufficient out- by "cutting off' a harmful flow of water across the property. let, i.e., a natural watercourse or a drain constructed under In some instances, a "special benefit assessment" may be The Drainage Act. levied against the property. This value usually represents Since there is no right to drain surface water, the owner the difference in cost between that which was originally of each parcel of land in the watershed is generally assessed designed and the increased level of design requested by a for "outlet liability ". In other words, his or her Common landowner. For example, a closed or tile drain where open Law liability is removed by paying for the increased size or ditches would ordinarily suffice, or the construction of cost of the drain due to the volume of water which is dis- ponds beside the drain, or other special request* by a charged from his or her property, even though the drain may landowner specifically for this benefit. The authority for not provide a direct outlet for this water. The authority for this liability is set out in Section 24. this liability is set out in Section 23(1). Since, through Common Law, a landowner is also liable Engineer's Report for any damage he or she may cause from water which he or The Engineer's report should contain a plan and profile she collects in drains and discharges on other land without a of the drain, as well as details on the drain design and the sufficient outlet, he or she may be assessed for relief from assessment schedule. such "injuring liability" if the new drain serves as an outlet The plan shows the location of drains and the limits of for his or her drains and prevents this injury from occurring. the watershed. The profile shows ground elevations along The authority for this liability is set out in Section 23(2). the drain and the present and proposed drain bottom. The Injuring liability is frequently difficult to distinguish from specifications give details on how the drain is to be con- outlet liability, consequently many engineers' reports do not structed, contain such an item. The Schedule of Assessment contains several columns. The assessment for outlet liability and injuring liability is The first group contains the names of owners with a descrip- based on the volume and rate of flow of the water artificially tion of each parcel of land assessed. caused to flow from an owner's property. Generally, the The hectarage shown in the schedule for which an owner assessment is based upon a unit value per hectarage. Owners at higher elevations on a watershed may have a is assessed is only approximate. No survey is made to accu higher unit charge than those owners near the outlet since rately establish the watershed boundary or farm areas. Any the water from their land makes use of a greater length of minor error in hectarage assessed is not a valid basis for drain. A difference may be made in the unit outlet charge appeal nor does it greatly affect the assessment. The other due to varying types of soil or land use, or the distance to the columns in the Schedule set forth the assessment liability for drain. each drain and /or branch drain. These values are only esti- mates. The final value will not be known until the construe- Responsibility Under The Drainage Act tion work is finished. The assessment will then be prorated In addition to the Common Law responsibility, an owner to recover the actual cost. may also be assessed for benefit. Allowances to lands injured by the work are set out in a Benefit will vary between different Lands. according to separate schedule by the engineer. Authority for this is their differences of elevation, quantity of water to be drained Sections 29 to 33 of the Drainage Act. from each, distance of undrained land from the course of the Damage to crops during construction and disposal of proposed ditch, and the presence or absence of existing waste material will vary with the time of year the work is drains, and other like factors. constructed. Crop damage due to spreading the spoil on the To consider whether a parcel of land will receive any banks is based on a decreasing yearly loss of crop over sev- benefit from the construction, it is proper to consider eral years. All or part of the cost of access bridges from a whether any enhanced financial value will accrue to it as a public road to the property may be assessed to the property result of the drain construction. This may occur through the owner. increased productive power of the and or by rendering it Farm bridges are constructed as a part of the work. In more saleable and at a better price, or by preventing water certain circumstances a severance allowance may be paid from entering on to it. instead of building the bridge. The allowance will depend If the proposed drainage works can be of no possible ben- upon the value of the land severed. or the cost of the bridge efit to the owner, or is of no commercial or agricultural that would be required. The cost. or part of the cost of farm value, the Act does not authorize a contribution for benefit. bridges or the severance allowance may be assessed against Sometimes, an owner has an undeveloped area that he or the property. she intends to leave in this condition. The owner may feel Where private drains are incorporated into the new drain. that he or she should not be assessed since the drain will be a nominal allowance may be paid based on any saving that of no benefit. However, the property could change hands may result from using the private drain. These allowances and the new owner might want to drain and develop it. It is may not be included in the Summary of Assessments but are with this in mind that the engineer must make an assess- usually shown in a separate Schedule of Allowances. ment, regardless of the present owner's intentions. It is the duty of the engineer to determine whether or not a parcel of land will benefit from the project. When 5M 2 appealling a benefit assessment, the landowner must prove • oru�o = ISSN 02_5 -788_ that the land has no benefit from the drain. Version francaise egatement offerte - D1 - Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 CWAL BUSH OTHER EQUIV. ROLL CONC. LOT LAND AREA AREA AREA AREA (TILED) AREA # # # OWNER (Acre) (Ha) (Ha.) (Ha.) (Ha.) (Ha.) Main Drain 2 -266 Conc 9 Lot 29 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 60.8 24.6 7.5 5.0 12.1 14.0 2 -267 Conc 9 Lot 30 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 3.0 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.6 3- 045 -10 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 84.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 34.0 3 -045 Conc 10 Part Lot 28 P.G. & B.J. Burns 3.4 1.4 1.4 0.0 1.4 3 -046 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 100.0 40.5 25.0 15.5 32.8 3 -047 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 98.1 39.7 13.9 25.8 26.8 3 -048 Conc 10 W 1/2 Lot 31 R. & D. Dufton 30.0 12.1 9.9 2.3 11.0 3 -092 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 93.1 37.7 37.1 0.6 37.4 3 -093 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 50.0 20.3 18.6 1.7 19.4 3- 095 -20 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 146.9 59.5 54.8 4.7 57.1 3 -095 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 2.6 1.1 1.1 3 -096 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 37.1 15.0 14.0 1.0 14.5 3 -143 Conc 12 Lot 26 J. & C. McCulloch 1.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.7 3 -145 Conc 12 Lot 27 W 1/2 Lot 28 J. & C. McCulloch 19.0 7.7 0.0 7.7 3.9 3 -147 Conc 12 E 1/2 Lot 28 R. Caldwell 7.0 2.8 0.0 2.8 1.4 3 -148 Conc 12 Lot 29 R. Caldwell 6.0 2.4 0.0 2.4 1.2 Side road 30 Kincardine 4.8 2.0 5.9 Concession 10 Kincardine 6.8 2.8 11.1 Totals for Main Drain 754.4 305.4 274.2 Branch A 3 -092 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3.7 1.5 0.9 0.6 1.2 3 -093 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 11.0 4.5 2.8 1.7 3.6 3- 095 -20 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 49.8 20.2 15.5 4.7 17.8 3 -096 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 12.4 5.0 4.0 1.0 4.5 Totals for Branch A 77.0 31.2 27.2 Branch B 3 -092 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 1.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 3 -093 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 21.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 3- 095 -20 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 97.0 39.3 39.3 39.3 3 -095 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 2.6 1.1 1.1 3 -096 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 24.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 3- 045 -10 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.3 3 -046 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 29.6 12.0 12.0 8.0 3 -047 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 24.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 Concession 2 Kincardine 4.7 1.9 7.6 Totals for Branch B 211.7 85.7 86.8 Equivalent Factors: Under drained into Watershed = 0.33 Bush = 0.5 Surface drained into Watershed = 0.67 Gravel Road = 3 Paved = 4 -D2- FINAL SECTION COSTS Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 Section Drain Structures Provisionals Allowances Sub -Total Admin. TOTALS Main Drain M1 10,070 - 1,050 2,860 13,980 4,190 18,170 (0 +000 to 0 +1342) Branch A Al 6,910 - 720 860 8,490 5,040 13,530 (0 +000 to 0 +141) A2 8,450 1,720 1,060 1,750 12,980 7,710 20,690 (0 +141 to 0 +364) Branch A Total 15,360 1,720 1,780 2,610 21,470 12,750 34,220 Branch B B1 8,350 - 870 490 9,710 5,250 14,960 (0 +000 to 0 +077) B2 13,150 4,090 1,800 2,080 21,120 11,430 32,550 (0 +077 to 0 +357) Branch B Total 21,500 4,090 2,670 2,570 30,830 16,680 47,510 TOTALS 46,930 5,810 5,500 8,040 66,280 33,620 99,900 II - D3 - Municipal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Section Number = M1 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 [1] Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S = 0.00 Date: April 2011 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 18,170 [3] Specific Costs Work is considered a clean out, therefore all the costs are assessed as outlet assessment Total Specific Costs = - Remainder to Assess = 18,170 [4] Normal Outlet 100 % Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 0 % [5] Equiv't Area Drained = 274.20 Ha. @ $ 66.26 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlet = 18,170 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = - [7] Direct Outlet il II Total of Direct Outlet = - ® [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = - SUMMARY TABLE 1 CONC. LOT OWNER EQ. AREA BENEFIT (Sec 22) Sec 24/26 OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL (Ha.) Specific Normal Direct Normal [9] In Section Conc 12 Lot 26 J. & C. McCulloch 0.72 50 50 Conc 12 Lot 27 W 1/2 Lot 28 J. & C. McCulloch 3.85 260 260 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 37.41 2,480 2,480 [10] U/S of Section Conc 9 Lot 29 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 13.99 930 930 Conc 9 Lot 30 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 0.61 40 40 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 34.00 2,250 2,250 Conc 10 Part Lot 28 P.G. & B.J. Burns 1.39 90 90 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 32.75 2,170 2,170 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 26.80 1,780 1,780 Conc 10 W 1/2 Lot 31 R. & D. Dufton 10.99 730 730 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot M.H. White 19.43 1,290 1,290 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 57.12 3,790 3,790 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 1.06 70 70 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 14.51 960 960 Conc 12 E 1/2 Lot 28 R. Caldwell 1.42 90 90 Conc 12 Lot 29 R. Caldwell 1.22 80 80 Side road 30 Kincardine 5.88 390 390 Concession 10 Kincardine 11.08 720 720 [11] Sub - Total = $ 18,170 [12] Cumulative Total = $ 18,170 Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 66.26 - D4 - Municipal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Section Number = Al Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 [1] Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S = 0.00 Date: April 2011 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 13,530 [3] Specific Costs Total Specific Costs = - Remainder to Assess = 13,530 [4] Normal Outlet 90 Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 10 [5] Equiv't Area Drained = 25.98 Ha. @ $ 468.82 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlet = 12,180 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = 1,350 [7] Direct Outlet Lot 27, Conc 11 uses 1 /3rd off section for outlet 190 Total of Direct Outlet = 190 [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = 1,160 SUMMARY TABLE CONC. LOT OWNER EQ. AREA BENEFIT (Sec 22) Sec 24/26 OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL (Ha.) Specific 1 Normal Direct 1 Normal [9] In Section Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 1.23 - 1,160 - 190 - 1,350 [10] U/S of Section [11] Sub - Total = $ 1,350 [12] Cumulative Total = $ 1,350 Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 468.82 - D5 - Municipal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Section Number = A2 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 [1] Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S = $ 469 Date: April 2011 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 20,690 [3] Specific Costs DICB at Sta A0 +141 - 1/2 cost to Conc 11, West Half of Lot 28, remainder to drain 860 Admin associated with structure 400 DICB at Sta A0 +364 - 1/2 cost to Conc 11, Lot 28/29, remainder to drain 805 Admin associated with structure 380 Total Specific Costs = 2,445 Remainder to Assess = 18,245 [4] Normal Outlet 80 Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 20 [5] Equiv't Area Drained = 22.34 Ha. @ $ 653.68 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlet = 14,600 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = 3,645 [7] Direct Outlet West 1/2 of Lot 28 uses 1 /3rd of the drain for direct outlet 790 Total of Direct Outlet = 790 [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = 2,855 SUMMARY TABLE CONC. LOT OWNER EQ. BENEFIT (Sec 22) Sec 26 OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL AREA Specific I Normal Direct I Normal [9] In Section Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3.65 1,260 2,855 790 1,710 6,615 [10] U/S of Section Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 17.83 1,185 20,010 21,195 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 4.51 5,060 5,060 [11] Sub - Total = $ 32,870 [12] Cumulative Total = $ 34,220 Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 1,123 - D6 - Summary Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Number of Sections = Two Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Final Cost/Eq. Ha. = $ 1,123 Date: April 2011 Total Cost = $ 34,220 SUMMARY TABLE II CONC. LOT OWNER Roll No. ACTUAL EQ. AREA BENEFIT (Sec 22) OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL GRANT ALLOW'S NET AREA (Ha.) (Ha.) Specific 1 Normal Direct 1 Normal Lands Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 1.51 1.23 - 1,160 190 - 1,350 450 860 40 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 4.47 3.65 1,260 2,855 790 1,710 6,615 2,205 1,700 2,710 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 20.18 17.83 1,185 - - 20,010 21,195 7,065 50 14,080 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 5.00 4.51 - - - 5,060 5,060 1,687 3,373 - D7 - Municipal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Section Number = B1 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 [1] Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S = 0.00 Date: April 2011 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 14,960 [3] Specific Costs Total Specific Costs = - Remainder to Assess = 14,960 [4] Normal Outlet 90 % Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 10 % [5] Equiv't Area Drained = 86.21 Ha. @ $ 156.14 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlet = 13,460 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = 1,500 [7] Direct Outlet Lot 27, Conc 11 uses 1/3 of section for outlet 31 Total of Direct Outlet = 31 [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = 1,469 SUMMARY TABLE CONC. LOT OWNER EQ. AREA BENEFIT (Sec 22) Sec 24/26 OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL (Ha.) Specific 1 Normal Direct 1 Normal [9] In Section Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 0.61 - 1,469 - 31 - 1,500 [10] U/S of Section [11] Sub - Total = $ 1,500 [12] Cumulative Total = $ 1,500 Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 156.14 - D8 - Municipal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Section Number = B2 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 [1] Cost/Eq. Ha. from D/S = 156.14 Date: April 2011 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 32,550 [3] Specific Costs DICB at Sta B0 +077 - 1/2 cost to Conc 11, West Half of Lot 28 1,240 Admin associated with structure 580 DICB at Sta B0 +358 - 1/2 cost to Conc 11, East Half of Lot 28 805 Admin associated with structure 320 Total Specific Costs = 2,945 Remainder to Assess = 29,605 [4] Normal Outlet 85 % I Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 15 % [5] Equiv't Area Drained = 77.38 Ha. @ $325.17 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlet = 25,160 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = 4,445 [7] Direct Outlet West 1/2 of Lot 28 uses 1/3 of the drain for direct outlet 950 —II Total of Direct Outlet = 950 1 [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = 3,495 SUMMARY i A141.1 �[ CONC, LOT (OWNER EQ. BENEFIT (Sec 22) OUTLET (Sec 23) AREA S.ecific Normal Sec 26 Direct Normal TOTAL [9] In Section Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 8.83 1,820 3,495 950 1,380 7,645 [10] U/S of Section Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 39.29 1.125 18,910 20,035 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 1.06 510 510 , Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 10.00 4,810 4,810 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 1.35 650 650 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 8.04 3,870 3,870 3 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 10.00 4,810 4,810 Concession 2 Kincardine 7.64 3,680 3,680 [11] Sub - Total = $ 46,010 [12] Cumulative Total = $ 47,510 Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 481.30 - D9 - Summary Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Number of Sections = Three Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Final Cost/Eq. Ha. = $ 481 Date: April 2011 Total Cost = $ 47,510 SUMMARY TABLE 11 CONC. LOT OWNER Roll No. ACTUAL EQ. AREA BENEFIT (Sec 22) OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL GRANT ALLOW'S NET AREA (Ha.) (Ha.) Specific 1 Normal Direct 1 Normal Lands Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 0.61 0.61 - 1,469 31 - 1,500 500 490 510 Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 8.83 8.83 1,820 3,495 950 1,380 7,645 2,548 2,030 3,067 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 39.29 39.29 1,125 - - 18,910 20,035 6,678 50 13,307 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 3 -095 1.06 1.06 - - - 510 510 510 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 10.00 10.00 - - - 4,810 4,810 1,603 3,207 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Lt 3- 045 -10 2.01 1.35 - - - 650 650 217 433 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Lt 3 -046 12.00 8.04 - - - 3,870 3,870 1,290 2,580 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 3 -047 10.00 10.00 - - - 4,810 4,810 1,603 3,207 Concession 2 Kincardine 1.91 7.64 - - - 3,680 3,680 3,680 I - D10 - Summary of Assessments Worksheet Project Number: MCW179390 Project Name: Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branch A & B - 2011 Date: April 2011 SUMMARY TABLE CONC. LOT OWNER Roll No. TOTAL GRANT ALLOW'S NET Main Drain! Branch A Branch B Lands Conc 9 Lot 29 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -266 930 930 310 620 Conc 9 Lot 30 A. Davey & Sons Ltd. 2 -267 40 40 13 27 Conc 10 Lot 28 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3- 045 -10 2,250 650 2,900 967 1,933 Conc 10 Part Lot 28 P.G. & B.J. Burns 3 -045 90 90 30 60 Conc 10 Lot 29 Ontario Pennisnula Farms Ltd. 3 -046 2,170 3,870 6,040 2,013 4,027 Conc 10 Lot 30 K. Elliott 3 -047 1,780 4,810 6,590 2,197 4,393 Conc 10 W 1/2 Lot 31 R. & D. Dufton 3 -048 730 730 243 487 Conc 11 Lot 27 J.A. & J.F. Allen 3 -092 2,480 1,350 1,500 5,330 1,777 3,890 (337) Conc 11 West 1/2 Lot 28 M.H. White 3 -093 1,290 6,615 7,645 15,550 5,183 3,730 6,637 Conc 11 E 1/2 Lot 28, Lot 29 Bavik Farms Inc. 3- 095 -20 3,790 21,195 20,035 45,020 15,007 100 29,913 Conc 11 Pt Lot 29 K. Vallee 3 -095 70 510 580 193 387 Conc 11 Lot 30 J. Horn 3 -096 960 5,060 4,810 10,830 3,610 7,220 Conc 12 Lot 26 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -143 50 50 17 33 Conc 12 Lot 27 W 1/2 Lot 28 J. & C. McCulloch 3 -145 260 260 87 320 (147) Conc 12 E 1/2 Lot 28 R. Caldwell 3 -147 90 90 30 60 Conc 12 Lot 29 R. Caldwell 3 -148 80 80 27 53 Side road 30 Kincardine 390 390 390 Concession 10 Kincardine 720 - 3,680 4,400 4,400 l BURNSI DE f TUF IF'Ff REHCE [P OUR PEOPLE] Appendix E Special Information to Tenderers and Specifications Municipality of Kincardine 1 Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 Special Information to Tenderers for Construction Municipal Drain # 9 - Anness Branches A & B - 2011 Municipality of Kincardine Extent of the Work Location This Drain is located in the north east section of the former geographic Township of Bruce, Lot 27 -29, Concession 11, Municipality of Kincardine. The proposed cleanout and deepening of the Main Drain is approximately 1,340 m in length, while the tile Branches A and B are each approximately 360 m in length. The approximate location is shown on the enclosed Plans. Description The work to be undertaken generally includes: • Clean out and deepening of approximately 1,340 m of the channel • Installation of approximately 135 m of 400 mm diameter CDT complete with ditch inlet catch basin. • Installation of approximately 223 m of 300 mm diameter CDT complete with ditch inlet catch basin. • Installation of approximately 77 m of 600 mm diameter HDPE complete with ditch inlet catch basin. • Installation of approximately 281 m of 450 mm diameter CDT complete with ditch inlet catch basin. Generally the installation, maintenance and removal of temporary sediment control measures as directed; installation of the new CDT and HDPE by the trenching method, unless approved otherwise by the engineer; and stripping and replacing of topsoil in locations specified by the engineer. Subsoil Conditions Subsoil investigations have not been undertaken on this project. The Tenderer shall tender the installation of the CDT on the basis of using a trencher; however, as specified in the Provisional Items, the Tenderer shall provide unit prices for the installation of the CDT in poor soil conditions. Pre - Construction Meeting The Contractor MUST arrange an on -site Pre - Construction Meeting with the engineer before any equipment is moved onto the site and before any work is commenced on this project. Furthermore, notification of the commencement of in -water work shall be provided to the applicable Conservation Authority at least 10 days prior to the initiation of the work, if in -water water is required. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW 179390 Municipality of Kincardine 2 Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 Access Routes One access route to the working space for the channel and one access route for the tile drains has been provided and the Contractor shall confirm these access routes with the engineer prior to commencing any work. SECTION A — Main Drain - Open At Lot 26 and 27, Concession 11 and 12 Sta. 0 +000 to 1 +342 approx. For the lump sum price bid, the Contractor shall: a) Undertake a botturn -only cleanout and deepening, where required, of the existing Open Drain for a length of approximately 1,342 m in Lot 26 and Lot 27, Concession 11 & 12, providing a side slope of 1.5H:1 V in the excavated area only, working from the left or the east side of the channel. The spoil will be spread along side the drain beyond a 3 m width to the depths indicated in the specifications. A temporary sediment basin with drainage stone check dam and filter cloth at the downstream end of the work shall be constructed and, when necessary during and at completion of the project and /or when instructed by the engineer, the Contractor shall remove and spread any accumulated sediment. SECTION B — Branch A — Closed B1. Lot 27, Concession 11 — Sta. 0 +000 to A0 +141 approx. For the lump sum price bid, the Contractor shall: a) Supply and install 6 m of 500 mm diameter 1.6 mm gauge riveted corrugated steel outlet pipe, complete with rodent grate, approximately 15 m of 200 to 300 mm diameter quarry stone riprap on approved geotextile. b) Supply and install approximately 135 m of 400 mm diameter concrete drainage tile, from the CSP to station A0 +141 approximately. B2. West 1 /2 Lot 28, Concession 11 — Sta. A0 +141 to A0 +364 approx. For the lump sum price bid, the Contractor shall: a) Supply and install a ditch inlet catch basin, complete with birdcage grate, berm and rip rap around the catch basin at station A0 +141 approximately. b) Supply and install approximately 223 m of 300 mm diameter concrete drainage tile, from the catch basin at A0 +141 to catch basin at station A0 +364 approximately. c) Supply and install a ditch inlet catch basin, complete with birdcage grate, berm and rip rap around the catch basin at station A0 +364 approximately. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW 179390 Municipality of Kincardine 3 Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 SECTION C — Branch B — Closed C1. Lot 27, Concession 11 — Sta. 0 +000 to B0 +077 approx. For the lump sum price bid, the Contractor shall: a) Supply and install 77 m of 600 mm diameter smooth wall high density polyethylene (HDPE) bell and spigot drainage pipe, Boss 2000 or equivalent, manufactured to specification O.P.S.S. 1840, from the outlet into the open channel to station B0 +077 approximately. The outlet pipe shall include a rodent grate, approximately 15 m of 200 to 300 mm diameter quarry stone riprap on approved geotextile. C2. West 1 /2 of Lot 28, Concession 11 — Sta. B0 +077 to B0 +358 approx. For the lump sum price bid, the Contractor shall: a) Supply and install a ditch inlet catch basin, complete with birdcage grate, berm and rip rap around the catch basin at station B0 +077 approximately. b) Supply and install approximately 281 m of 450 mm diameter concrete drainage tile, from the catch basin at B0 +077 to catch basin at station B0 +358 approximately. c) Supply and install a ditch inlet catch basin, complete with birdcage grate, berm and rip rap around the catch basin at station B0 +358 approximately. SECTION D - PROVISIONAL ITEMS This section covers work that may be required for this project. These items shall apply only as and when approved by the engineer. Dl. Riprap For the unit price bid per square metre, the Contractor shall supply and install a 500 mm thickness of 150 mm to 300 mm diameter quarry stone riprap: a) with filter cloth; and b) without filter cloth. These unit prices shall be used for payment for any riprap installed in addition to those quantities already specified in other items and for credit for any quantities of riprap deleted from other items. D2. Existing Tile Outlets to the Open Municipal Drain For the lump sum price bid for each, the Contractor shall supply and install new CSP or Poly tile drain outlet pipes, 3 m in length, with rodent grates and 3 m of riprap with filter cloth, properly sized to fit over tile drains of the following sizes: a) 100 mm, b) 150 mm, and c) 200 mm. D3. Connecting Existing Tile to the New Municipal Drain Normally, connections to the new Municipal Drain tile will NOT be allowed; however, this item may be used in unusual circumstances, but only with special written permission from the engineer. For the lump sum price bid for each, the Contractor shall supply all labour, equipment and material required to connect any unknown existing tile drains encountered during R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 Municipality of Kincardine 4 Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 construction to the new Municipal Drain tile drain using only PROPER FITTINGS, as follows: a) 100 mm; b) 150 mm; and c) 200 mm and larger. D4. Reconnecting Existing Tile Normally, unknown existing tile drains encountered during construction will be reconnected to themselves, above the new Municipal Drain tile. In these cases, for the lump sum price bid for each, the Contractor shall supply all labour, equipment and material required to reconnect the tile to itself, in accordance with the appropriate specification. This does not include any tile mentioned in other items. Rigid pipe MUST be used for all of these tile reconnections as follows: a) 100 mm; b) 150 mm; and c) 200 mm and larger. D5. Special Installation Techniques For the additional unit price bid per lineal metre of trench, the Contractor shall install the CDT with a hydraulic excavator instead of a trencher, with drainage stone completely wrapped with an approved geotextile. The Contractor shall note that this unit price is in addition to the lump sum price bid for the applicable CDT Items in other Sections. This item shall be used only when the soil conditions encountered are such that a trencher cannot, in the opinion of the engineer, be used effectively to install the tile; however, the Contractor MUST receive written approval from the engineer prior to using either of these techniques. The drainage stone required for this special installation shall be a minimum of 150 mm in thickness and of adequate width to properly support the size of tile being installed. The Contractor shall note that joint wrapping still applies under the original items. WORKING SPACE STATION MAXIMUM COMMENTS WIDTH (m) 0 +000 — 1 +342 12 Work for the open channel on the east side of the drain. Access from Concession Road on Lot 27, Concession 11 A0 +000 — A0 +364 20 Access to Drain from West % Lot 28 along property line B0 +000 — B0 +358 20 Access to Drain from West 1/2 Lot 28 along property line NOTES: (1) The Contractor shall contain his construction operations to as narrow a width as possible, so as to prevent damage to lands, crops, bush, etcetera, but in no case shall they exceed the widths indicated. (2) The Contractor shall be entirely responsible for any damage to lands, crops, etcetera, beyond the widths and locations of both the access routes and the working spaces specified, caused by him, his subcontractors, or his employees while undertaking the work. (3) The engineer's approval MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE exceeding the maximum widths indicated. (4) Access to the working space shall be public roads, farm lanes, or as specified. All routes must be approved by the engineer prior to construction. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW179390 Municipality of Kincardine 5 Municipal Drain # 9 — Anness, Branches A & B — 2011 April 29, 2011 STRUCTURE DETAILS MINIMUM APPROX. APPROX. STATION TYPE SIZE DEPTH ELEV'N OUTLET INLET COMMENTS INSIDE (with sump) OF TOP Branch A A0 +141 DICB 600 x 600 1.8 W 255.20 W 400 CDT E 300 CDT Set at property x115 mm E 254.90 @ 253.35 @ 253.40 line A0 +364 DICB 600 x 600 1.5 W 256.30 W 300 CDT E 300 CDT Set at property x115 mm E 256.00 @ 254.74 @ 254.84 line (plugged) Branch B B0 +077 DICB 1200 x 900 1.9 W 255.60 W 600 E 450 CDT Set at property x115 mm E 255.30 HDPE @ @ 253.73 line 253.68 B0 +358 DICB 600 x 600 1.6 W 257.20 W 450 CDT E 300 CDT Set at property x 115 mm E 256.90 @ 255.56 @ 255.66 line (plugged) ANY VARIATION FROM THE ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF THESE STRUCTURES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. STRUCTURES NOT MANUFACTURED AS SPECIFIED MAY BE REJECTED FOR USE AND SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NOTES: (1) All structures shall have a minimum sump of 300 mm unless otherwise noted. (2) All catchbasins and junction boxes shall have birdcage grates to suit and riprap for 1 m around structure, unless indicated otherwise in the detail specifications. (3) Provide posts and markers for ALL structures. (4) All grates and covers must be fastened to the structure in an approved manner. (5) All structures shall have plugged inlets in those sides not utilized by the drain 200 mm in diameter and 0.10 m above the outlet, unless otherwise noted. All plugged inlets (knock -outs) must be identified on the inside of the structure, in an approved manner. (6) All connections made to structures must be made using rigid pipe which must span from the structure to undisturbed native soil. (7) Where 900 x 1200 structures are specified, the Municipal Drain inlets and outlets shall be installed in the 1,200 mm walls and plugged inlets shall be installed in the 900 mm walls. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited MCW 179390 E.2.1 GENERAL DRAIN SPECIFICATION E.2.1.1 SCOPE OF SPECIFICATION This specification covers the general conditions governing the construction of a Municipal Drain under the most recent revision of The Drainage Act and amendments thereto. E.2.1.2 BENCHMARKS Benchmarks shall be set at intervals along the course of the work at locations shown on the accompanying plan and /or profile. The Contractor shall be held liable for the cost of re- establishing bench marks destroyed during the course of construction. Attention is drawn to Section 13(2) of The Drainage Act. E.2.1.3 STAKES /FLAGS Normally stakes, flags or markers are set 30 m apart throughout the course of the work, at all fences and property lines. The Contractor shall be held liable for the cost of replacing any stakes destroyed during construction. The drainage area shall be held liable for the cost of replacing any stakes destroyed prior to commencement of construction. E.2.1.4 LINE The drain shall run in straight lines throughout each course except at intersections, where it shall run on a curve of 15 m radius unless otherwise specified. If the work consists of the improvement of an existing open drain, then the centre line of the existing drain will be the centre line of the finished work unless otherwise specified. The centre line of the ditch shall be staked by the Contractor at least one complete course ahead of the digging, and all sloping and widening necessary shall be done in such a manner as to make the finished work uniform. E.2.1.5 PROFILE The drain is to be excavated to regular grade lines as shown on the profile. These grade lines show the bottom of the finished drain and are governed entirely by the benchmarks. In the case of tile drains, the grade line is that of the invert of the tile. The profile shows, for the convenience of the Contractor and others, the approximate depths from the surface of the ground to the grade at the point where the numbered stakes are set and from the average bottom of the present drain as taken at the time of survey, however, the bench marks must govern the construction. Open drains shall be brought to an even grade in the bottom so that water will not stand therein. A variation of 25 mm from the grade lines for tile drains shall be deemed sufficient reason to cause the work to be rejected and done over. E.2.1.6 CLEARING Brush, timber, logs, stumps, boulders or other obstructions located in or along the course of the work and any brush or debris along the banks of a drainage works shall be removed a sufficient distance to be clear of the excavation and the excavated material, or to the widths shown on the page entitled "Working Space ". No brush or trees are to be left inside the slopes of the drain PAGE 1 OF 11 whether they are located within the limits of the excavation or not. Brush cleared in accordance with the above shall be piled in a location and in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer for burning by the Owner. Unless otherwise specified or directed, brush piles shall be a minimum of 100 m apart and shall contain only cleared material. The Contractor will be permitted to cut standing timber along the course of a works, to the extent that may in the opinion of the Engineer be necessary to allow the safe and economical operation of the excavating equipment. Timber so cut shall be left on the property of origin for use of and disposal by the Owner. E.2.1.7 FENCES The Contractor will be permitted to remove fences to the extent necessary to allow him to construct the drain and dispose of any excess material according to specifications. Any such fences shall be carefully handled so as to cause no unnecessary damage. Such fences shall be replaced by the Contractor in as good a condition as found. The Contractor shall supply all material necessary to properly reconstruct any fences. The contractor shall not leave any fence open when he is not at work in the immediate area. Replacing of the fences shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The Contractor shall be deemed to have met this specification when he obtains a statement in writing signed by the Owners of the land affected to the effect that the treatment of fences is satisfactory to them. E.2.1.8 TRIBUTARY OUTLETS During the construction of a tile drain, the Contractor shall afford opportunity to the Owners to connect tributary tile drains to the main drain if approved by the Engineer and at locations approved by the Engineer. During the construction of an open drain, the Contractor shall guard against damaging outlets of any tributary drains encountered. E.2.1.9 NOTIFICATION OF AGENCIES The Contractor shall, before performing any work affecting the land or property of the Ministry of Transportation & Communications, or any railway, telephone, pipeline company or public utility, obtain at his expense any necessary permits or approvals for the construction. The Contractor shall further agree to perform the work affecting such lands or property in accordance with the specifications of such Ministry, company or utility, as though said specifications were hereto attached. The Contractor shall provide 10 days written notice when construction will affect the right -of -way of a Municipality, County, the Ministry of Transportation & Communications, or a railway, as follows: if a Municipality, then the Road Superintendent or Public Works Foreman shall be advised; if a County, then the County Engineer shall be advised; if the Ministry of Transportation & Communications, then the District Engineer shall be advised; and if a railway, then the Area Engineer of the railway shall be advised. Copies of this notice shall be sent to the Drainage Engineer. E.2.1.10 STANDING CROPS AND LIVESTOCK Should a property owner wish to harvest any crop along an access route or within the construction working space as set out in the drainage report, then it shall be the responsibility of PAGE 2 OF 11 the property owner to do so in advance Construction. Provisions for the loss of, or damage to, crops along the access route or in the construction area ("Working Space ") have been made in the report and such loss or damage shall not be the liability of the Contractor. The Contractor shall contain his construction operations to the working space specified. As long as the construction operations are contained within the specified working space, the Contractor shall not be responsible for damages to crops along the course of the drain. It shall be the responsibility of each property owner to keep his livestock clear of the construction area upon 36 hours advance notice by the Contractor. After receiving proper notice, the Owner of the property upon which a drain is being constructed shall be liable for any loss or damage to livestock, the drain, drain materials, or the Contractor's equipment caused by his/her livestock. E.2.1.11 ROADS When the construction consists partly or wholly of the removal of a drain from a road allowance, such drain shall be constructed entirely on farm lands and excavated material shall be placed in the abandoned channel as directed by the Road Superintendent of the Corporation having authority over said road. If not otherwise directed, all work on any road allowance shall be performed as directed by the aforementioned Superintendent. Where it is necessary to replace any pavement it shall be done by, and at the expense of the authority having control over said road unless stated otherwise in the Special Information to Tenderers. E.2.1.12 DAMAGES LIABILITY The Contractor shall pay all losses, damages, or claims received by the Municipality and he shall protect and save harmless the Municipality against liability for any accidents, damages, casualty, losses, or claims directly or indirectly arising out of the Contract, or manner of performance thereof by the Contractor, his agents, employees or Subcontractor. The Contractor will be solely liable for all injuries and/or accidents to workmen, and /or public and /or livestock and/or property, and for any expenses or damages occasioned by fences being left open or improperly closed, insufficient guarding and lighting or bad workmanship at places where a drain runs along or across a road allowance or any negligence in carrying on the work. Any such expense or damages may be deducted from the amount of the contract or may be recovered by the Municipality from the Contractor or his sureties. The Municipality shall have the right to require the Contractor to furnish proof of his insurance against any or all liabilities prior to obtaining the contract. E.2.1.13 FINAL INSPECTIONS The Engineer will make a final inspection within 10 days after he has received notice in writing from the Contractor that the work is completed or as soon thereafter as weather conditions permit. All the work included in the contract must, at the time of final inspection, have the full dimensions and cross - sections called for in the plans and specifications. PAGE 3 OF 11 E.2.1.14 FAULTY MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP Neither the final certificate nor payment thereunder, nor any provision of the contract documents shall relieve the Contractor from responsibility for faulty materials or workmanship, which shall appear within a period of one year from the date of the Engineer's Completion Payment Certificate, and he shall remedy any defects thereto and pay for any damages to other work resulting therefrom which shall appear within such period of one year. E.2.1.15 TENDERS Unless otherwise stated at the time of tendering, tenders will be received and contracts awarded only in the form of a lump sum of the completion of the whole work in accordance with the drawings and specifications or of such portions as specified in the Tender Form. Where the Tender Form calls for unit prices for certain items, these unit prices shall only be used where it is necessary to make adjustments in the amount of work to be done. E.2.1.16 GUARANTEE The Contractor shall warrant the works for a period of one year from the date of issue of the completion certificate, against defects due to faulty workmanship and/or materials supplied by the Contractor. The Contractor shall remedy any defect and pay for any damage therefrom which may appear within such period and neither the final payment certificate nor the payments thereunder shall relieve him from such responsibility under, or by virtue of, the signed contract. E.2.1.17 MATERIALS As part of the work included in this contract, the Contractor shall place any and all material resulting from this project only in locations approved by the Engineer. The requirement shall apply to all materials, no matter who supplied said materials, and further, shall apply to any and all excess material remaining on site at the completion of the project. PAGE 4011 E.2.2 SPECIFICATION FOR OPEN DRAINS E.2.2.1 GEOMETRY The drain shall have the full specified bottom width, at the specified gradient, at the time of final inspection. Each side of an open drain shall be sloped at 1.5 m horizontally to 1.0 m vertically, or as otherwise specified or shown on the accompanying plan, profiles, and detail sheets. Each side of the drain shall be smooth and have a uniform slope from top to bottom. E.2.2.2 SPOIL BANK A clear berm or margin of at least 3 metres shall be left between the top edge of the open drain and the spoil bank. No excavated material is to be left in any ditches intended to conduct water into the open drain. In no case shall the side of the spoil bank closest to the drain be sloped greater than 1.51-i to 1.0V, unless specified otherwise. E2.2.3 EXCAVATED MATERIAL Excavated material shall be placed on the side specified or, if not specified, on the lower side of the drain or on the side opposite trees or fences. It shall be deposited, spread and levelled to a maximum depth of 150 mm, unless specified otherwise, and left in a manner such that the lands on which it is spread may be cultivated with adjacent lands by use of ordinary farm machinery. Material excavated in land that is timbered, may be spread to a maximum depth as specified on the profile or to a maximum depth of 300 mm, if not specified on the profile. In cultivated areas, the Contractor shall remove stones and boulders greater than 100 mm diameter from the excavated material and dispose of in an approved location. Treatment of excavated material shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The excavated material shall be seeded after it has been spread, unless specified otherwise. E.2.2.4 SURFACE WATER INLETS Surface water inlets to the drain shall be provided through the levelled spoil on each property at obvious natural low runs or at other locations as specified by the engineer on site at the time of construction. No excavated material shall be left in, or any damage done to a ditch, furrow, pipe, tile or depression that is intended to conduct water into an open drain. The ditchbank at all such inlets shall be riprapped as directed by the engineer. E.2.2.5 ABANDONED CHANNEL Excavated material shall be used to fill abandoned channels as specified in the Special Information to Tenderers or on the detail sheets. E.2.2.6 FARM BRIDGES All farm bridges shall have a minimum opening equal to the cross - sectional area specified in the report or on the profiles. PAGE 5 OF 11 E.2.2.7 FARM CULVERTS If, at the time of construction, the landowner has supplied a culvert of the specified size at the site, the Contractor shall install it as part of the work. All culverts shall be installed with the invert a minimum of 10% of the diameter below the gradient of the drain. E.2.2.8 EXCAVATION AT BRIDGE SITES The excavation at bridge sites shall be to the full depth of the drain and as nearly as possible the full width of the drain as specified for the bridge location. The excavation at a bridge site shall be made in a manner to protect the structural integrity of any permanent bridge. A temporary bridge may be carefully removed to allow excavation. The removal of a bridge is to be done in such a manner so as to cause no unnecessary damage to the bridge components. Temporary bridges removed to allow excavation shall be replaced in as good a condition as found, so far as material allows. Replacing of such bridges shall be to the satisfaction of the engineer. The Contractor shall immediately notify the engineer if it becomes apparent that excavating to a specified gradient will endanger any culvert or bridge. The Contractor shall cease excavation at the bridge or culvert site until the engineer instructs him to proceed. E.2.2.9 SEEDING Unless indicated otherwise in the Special Information to Tenderers, the Contractor shall seed the newly excavated ditch banks and levelled spoil (where specified) with the OPSS (MTO) Standard Roadside Seed Mix, consisting of 55% Creeping Red Fescue, 27% Kentucky Bluegrass, 15% Perennial Ryegrass and 3% White Clover, at an application rate of 100 kg/10,000 m plus a nurse crop of Fall Rye Grain or Winter Wheat Grain at an application rate of 60 kg /10,000 m at the end of each working day. E.2.2.10 SEDIMENT CONTROL Unless indicated otherwise in the Special Information to Tenderers, the Contractor shall install an approved sediment control device at the downstream end of the open drain excavation and at any other locations specified in the Special Information to Tenderers. The Contractor shall remove any accumulated sediment at regular intervals or as directed by the engineer. The Contractor shall then remove these devices, and any accumulated sediment therein, after the new open drain has stabilized and only after authorized by the engineer or the Drainage Superintendent. E.2.2.11 SEDIMENT BASINS The Contractor shall construct and maintain sediment control basins as specified. PAGE 6 OF 11 E2.3 SPECIFICATION FOR CLOSED DRAINS E.2.3.1 MATERIALS 1. Concrete Drain Tile (CDT) - All CDT installed under these specifications shall be "Heavy Duty Extra Quality" meeting the latest revision of ASTM C412. The manufacturer shall provide the engineer with a copy of all available test results for the materials being shipped to the project site. The engineer shall have the right to order any additional tests he deems necessary to be performed on the tile taken from inventory prior to shipment from the manufacturer's plant. The cost of such additional tests shall be borne by the owner. 2. Plastic Drainage Tubing (PDT) All PDT installed under these specifications shall be manufactured in accordance with the latest revision of the Drainage Guide for Ontario, as published by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 3. High Density Polyethylene Pipe (HOPE) - All corrugated or smoothwall HOPE pipe installed under these specifications as culverts or as part of a new closed drain shall be manufactured in accordance with the latest revision of Ontario Provincial Standard Specification 1840. 4. Tile, tubing and pipe materials supplied by the contractor shall be approved by the engineer prior to being incorporated in the work. 5. The contractor shall be responsible for the unloading and placement of all materials required for the Municipal Drain construction. Such unloading and placement shall be undertaken in a manner acceptable to the engineer using only the specified and approved access routes. E.2.3.2 DRAIN GRADIENT AND VERIFICATION The proposed gradient shall be established using laser grade control equipment, cross -head boning rods together with horizontal sight -bars at stations above and below the point where the tile is being laid or other method acceptable to the engineer. If the engineer has not checked the tile, inspection points shall be left at intervals of not greater than 50 m for sections with gradients less than 0.5 % and at intervals of not greater than 30 m for sections with gradients above 0.5 %. Inspection points shall also be left at all structures and all changes in gradient. Other inspections points may be required from time to time as requested by the engineer. E.2.3.3 TILE LAYING INCLUDING TOPSOIL STRIPPING 1. In the case of the installation of concrete drain tile, and unless specified otherwise in the Special Information to Tenderers, the contractor shall strip the topsoil in the area PAGE 7 OF 11 of the tile trench prior to installing the new tile with the trencher as part of the work under the appropriate item and no extra payment will be made for this stripping. After installation, confirming gradient, blinding, and back filling of the trench, the topsoil shall be replaced throughout the entire length of the Drain. The Contractor shall take into consideration the settlement of the backfill material over the trench prior to replacing the topsoil. 2. All concrete drain tile shall be installed with a wheel -type trencher and each tile shall be laid firmly and carefully in a smooth bottomed trench so that successive tiles align both vertically and horizontally as tightly as possible; the maximum allowable space between successive tiles shall be 6 mm. ALL joints of the CDT MUST be completely wrapped with geotextile as part of the work under the appropriate item and no extra payment will be made for this wrapping. The wrap on each joint shall be a minimum of 300 mm wide and of sufficient length to exceed the outside diameter of the largest tile being wrapped by a minimum of 300 mm. Any joints /couplers installed between rolls of PDT shall also be wrapped with geotextile as part of the work. 3. The Contractor is reminded that the widths of the tile trenches are to be kept to a minimum. It is recommended that the minimum trench width be 300 mm greater than the outside diameter of the tile or 150 mm on each side of the tile being installed. It is recommended that the maximum trench width be 600 mm greater than the outside diameter of the tile or 300 mm on each side of the tile being installed. 4. All plastic drainage tubing shall be installed with a self - propelled drainage plow. 5. All obstructions, dirt or foreign material shall be removed from the inside of the tile prior to laying. 6. Tile drains shall be constructed at an offset from, and parallel to, any existing ditch, defined watercourse or low run. The contractor shall exercise care not to disturb any existing tile drains which follow the same course as the new drain. E.2.3.4 RECONNECTION OF EXISTING TILE Normally, any subsurface drain encountered by the contractor when constructing a Municipal Drain under these specifications shall be reconnected to itself and not connected to the new Municipal Drain, unless directed otherwise by the engineer. The normal practice for reconnecting existing tile drains, up to and including 150 mm diameter, will be to hand compact uncontaminated sub -base material from the new trench bottom to the underside of the existing tile. After adequate consolidation has been achieved, approved, rigid pipe of adequate strength and sufficient size shall be connected to the existing tile in an approved manner. This connection shall be made where the existing tile is sound. When completing backfilling at such a location, the contractor shall take sufficient care to ensure that the new connecting pipe is not damaged. Any tile drains encountered which are larger than 150 mm in diameter may, if approved by the engineer, have their upstream end connected to the new drain, using only a PAGE 8 OF 11 proper fitting, and the downstream end of said tile shall be plugged to prevent entry of foreign material into the said tile. The contractor shall provide a unit price per connection and said unit price shall include the supply of all material, labour and equipment necessary to make the said connection. Further, the contractor shall notify the engineer and the affected landowner of any and all sub - surface drains encountered. E.2.3.5 TRENCH BACKFILLING As the laying of the tile progresses, partial filling or blinding shall be made at the sides of the trench sufficient to hold the tiles securely in place. The Contractor shall take special in placing the remainder of the excavated material to carefully backfill the trench and any excess backfill material shall be mounded over the trench such that future settlement and compaction around the new tile can occur without creating a depression over the width of the trench. The Contractor shall not operate construction equipment over the backfilled trench, except as noted. Care shall be exercised in backfilling the trench to see that no stone or boulder capable of damaging the tile is used in the backfill material adjacent to the tile. In no case shall stones having a diameter greater than 150 mm be used in backfill material within 300 mm of the tile. The contractor shall backfill any open tile trenches at the end of each working day except for inspection points as specified. E.2.3.6 TRENCH CROSSINGS The contractor shall not cross the backfilled trench with any construction equipment or vehicles, except at only ONE designated crossing location on each property. The contractor shall ensure that the bedding and backfill material at this designated crossing location is properly placed and compacted so as to adequately support the equipment and vehicles that may cross the trench. The contractor may undertake any other approved work to ensure the integrity of the tile at the crossing location. The contractor shall insure that no equipment or vehicles are allowed to travel along the length of the trench. The contractor shall be entirely responsible for any damage to the new tile caused by him, his subcontractors, or his employees while undertaking the work. E.2.3.7 OUTLET PROTECTION The outlet end of a tile drain shall normally consist of a 6 m length of rivetted corrugated steel pipe fitted with a rodent proof grating which is hinged at the top to allow the exit of foreign material from the tile. Unless otherwise specified, the end of the corrugated steel pipe shall be protected with the type of riprap on geotextile as specified by the engineer from a point 500 mm above the ditchbottom on the opposite side of the ditch, across the ditchbottom, and for the full height of the ditch sideslope where the pipe is located. The minimum width of this riprap shall be equal to the outside diameter of the outlet pipe plus 2 metres. PAGE 90F11 E.2.3.8 JUNCTION BOXES Unless specified otherwise, junction boxes (JB) shall be supplied by a precast manufacturer meeting the engineer's approval. An "approximate elevation of top" of each JB has been indicated on the "Structure Details" chart; however, each JB shall be placed onsite such that the top extends a minimum of 200 mm above the ground surface. The exact horizontal and vertical location of the basins in the field shall be as directed by the engineer. All JB shall have a plugged tile or blind inlet, set at 100 mm above the elevation of the outlet, placed in an sides not used by the drain. Plugged inlets must be of a size capable of connecting a pipe with a minimum inside diameter of 200 mm. Suitable grouting material (concrete, unless specified otherwise) shall be placed around all pipes connected to the box. In addition, all grouted connections shall be completely wrapped with geotextile (similar to a wrapped joint). Geotextile shall be placed in the joints between all sections of the box and around the full perimeter of the box at these joints. Galvanized, heavy duty, flat -top grates, equal to those provided by Coldstream Concrete Limited, shall be supplied for all JB, unless specified otherwise. Grates shall be fastened to the structure using non - corrosive fasteners as recommended by the OFSA. Buried junction boxes shall be pre - benched with no sump and shall have 150 mm thick solid concrete tops. Post and sign type markers shall be supplied and installed at each junction box. E.2.3.9 CATCHBASINS Unless specified otherwise, all JB specifications (listed above) shall apply to catchbasins (CB). Where ditchinlet catchbasins (DICB) are called for, the slope of the top shall be 2H:1 V, unless specified otherwise. An "approximate elevation of top" of each CB has been indicated on the "Junction Box - Catchbasin Details" sheet; however, each CB shall be placed onsite such that the top does not extend above the ground surface. In the case of a DICB the lower side of the box shall be set as directed below the ground surface. Grates for both flat top and ditchinlet catchbasins shall be galvanized, birdcage type, equal to those provided by Coldstream Concrete Limited, unless specified otherwise. For a DICB, this shall be the three -sided protruding type. E.2.3.10 STRIPPING FOR DEEP TILE INSTALLATION Where the tile installation depth exceeds the digging or plowing depth of the contractor's equipment, the contractor shall undertake any stripping that may be necessary in a manner such that when restored, the topsoil returns uncontaminated to the top of the stripped area. This would normally mean that the topsoil would be stripped and piled separately from the subsoil. The contractor shall have regard for the working space provided for such stripping operations. Unless approved otherwise by the engineer prior to work being undertaken, PAGE 10 OF 11 stripping shall be done using a hydraulic excavator. The cost of any stripping shall be included in the price provided for the tile installation. E.2.3.11 STONE REMOVAL The contractor shall remove and dispose of any stones larger than 100 mm that remain in the working space after completion of construction. PAGE 11 OF 11 ! BURNS IDE [THE DIFFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLE] Appendix F SVCA Permit ([11 , u , SENT ELECTRONICALLY (gguse @rjburnside.com) CCUNSLIt \ -A1IO AND BY REGULAR MAIL 1076 Bruce Rd. 12, April 27, 2011 PO. Box 150 Municipality of Kincardine Formosa ON 1475 Concession 5 Canada NOG IWO RR # 5 Tel 519-367-3040 Kincardine, ON Fax 519- 367 -3041 N2Z 3A9 publicinfo@svca.on.ca www svca.on.ca ATTENTION: George Guse, Drainage Superintendent Dear Mr. Guse: RE: Application to Alter a Watercourse Part Lot 26 -28, Concessions 11 & 12 Geographic Township of Bruce Municipality of Kincardine SVCA Permit No. 11 -024 The Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA) has approved the application that was submitted on your behalf by R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited for the cleanout and deepening of a portion of the existing open Anness Municipal Drain (Municipal Drain # 9), and establishing outlets for the proposed Branch A and Branch B buried tiles, as indicated on the enclosed permit. This approval is subject to conditions, which are stated on the permit. If you cannot comply with any condition listed as part of this approval, you must not begin your project and you must notify the SVCA. In addition, the SVCA reviewed this project for the potential impacts on fish habitat on behalf of the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans, for compliance with Section 35(1) of the Fisheries Act. The SVCA has concluded that physical impacts to fish habitat will be satisfactorily addressed or mitigated provided the application, as submitted, and the SVCA permit conditions are complied with. Thank you for your cooperation. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Candace Hamm of this office. Conservation Th Yours sincerely, A MEMBER OF (;4/4".: c o es Coffey Chie Administrative Officer Conservation ONTARIO Cfampber Municipality of Kincardine April 27, 2011 Page 2 CH /at Encl. cc: Stew Andrew, Ministry of Natural Resources, Owen Sound Jeremy Taylor, P. Eng. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited (via e-mail) Jim O'Rourke, Public Works Manager, Municipality of Kincardine Ron Coristine, Director, SVCA (via e-mail) Mike Leggett, Director, SVCA (via e-mail) PERMIT NO. 11-024 WA AUG PERMIT c()NsiRvAiloN Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O., 1990, Chap. C27 1078 Bruce Road 12 Box 150 Formosa, ON NOG MO 519-367-3040 SCHEDULE 1 OF B THIS PERMIT ISSUED ON April 27, 2011 AND EXPIRES ON April 27, 2012 El Permit for Major Works pi Permit for Minor Works El Permit for Standard/Other Works PERMIT TO: X Alter a Watercourse Place Fill or do Grading in a Regulated Area Construct a Building in a Regulated Area Construct a Structure in a Regulated Area In accordance with Regulation 169/06 and amendments thereto, permission is granted to: Name: Municipality of Kincardine 1475 Concession 5 Mailing Address: Municipality: RR 5 pality: Kincardine, ON # Postal Code: N2Z 2X6 Phone No.: 519-396-3468 For the following works: The cleanout and deepening of a portion of the existing open Anness Municipal Drain (Municipal Drain # 9), and establishing outlets for the proposed Branch A - and Branch B buried tiles. at Lot: Part Lots 26-28 Civic Address: Concession: 11 & 12 Municipality: Municipality of Kincardine (Geographic Township of Bruce) for the period of: July 15, 2011 to September 30, 2011 SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS STATED IN SCHEDULE 2 TO THIS PERMIT: NOTE: BEGIN YOUR PROJECT ONLY IF YOU, THE APPLICANT, AGREE TO ALL OF THE SPECIFIC AND GENERAL CONDITIONS STATED IN THIS PERMIT. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ANY CONDITION, YOU MUST NOTIFY THE SVCA AND YOU MUST NOT BEGIN YOUR PROJECT. GENERAL CONDITIONS: See reverse side of this form. Gary Senior Sr. Manager of Environmental Planning & Regulations 4 Signatur J '?it Official Title IMPORTANT! Read the reverse of this form GENERAL CONDITIONS The applicant, by acceptance and In consideration of the issuance of this permit, agrees to the following conditions: 1. The'applicant shall comply with the Specific Conditions in the attached schedules. 2. This permit is valid only for the time period specified and the applicant agrees to request an extension from the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority prior to the expiration of this period should an extension be required. 3. Thies permit does preclude any other legislation, federal or provincial, or necessary approvals from the local municipality. 4. Authorized representatives of the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority may, at any time, enter onto the lands which are described herein in order to make surveys, examinations, investigations or Inspections which are required for the purpose of ensuring that the work(s) authorized by this permit are being carried out according to the terms of this permit. 5. The applicant agrees (a) to indemnify and save harmless on a solicitor and client basis, the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority and its officers, employees, or agents, from and against all damage, loss, costs, claims, demands, actions and proceedings, arising out of or resulting from any act or omission of the owner and /or applicant or of any of his /her agents, employees or contractors relating to any of the particulars, terms or conditions of this permit; (b) that this permit shall not release the applicant from any legal liability or obligation and remains In force subject to all limitations, requirements and liabilities imposed by law; (c) that all complaints arising from the execution of the works authorized under this permit shall be reported prior to the expiration of this permit by the applicant to the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority. The applicant shall indicate any action which has been taken, or is planned to be taken, if any, with regard to each complaint; (d) that the permit issued herein is based upon the plans or sketches submitted to the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority and the accuracy of the matters contained in the application to the Authority. 6. This permit is not assignable. 7. The applicant acknowledges that should the works be carried out in contrary to the terms of this permit, the permit may be revoked and the applicant may be in vioialion of the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority's Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 169/06), and subject to the penalties Imposed under the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O, 1990, Chap. C27, as amended. This permit is a public record which is accessible upon request. This information in this permit Is collected under the authority of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O, 1990, Chap. C27, as amended. 2007 PERMIT NO. 11-024 SCHEDULE 13 OF in APPLICANT: Municipality of Kincardine SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. All work shall be in accordance with the Plan and Profile drawings, and the Cross Sections prepared by R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited, dated April 2011, and the application dated April 20, 2011. 2. It is the responsibility of the Applicant (Municipality of Kincardine) to ensure that any contractor(s) hired for the cleanout and deepening receive a copy of this permit. 3. The cleanout and deepening shall occur between July 15, 2011 and September 30, 2011 and during low flow conditions. Work shall not occur during or after extended periods of rain and high flow situations. If an extension to this time period is needed, the Applicant (Municipality of Kincardine) must notify the SVCA prior to September 30, 2011. It should not be assumed that an extension will necessarily be automatically granted by the SVCA. 4. Establishing the outlets for Branch A and Branch B may occur at any time; however, disturbance to the watercourse shall be minimized. 5. The culvert under the Concession 10 roadway and the private culvert on Lot 27, Concession 11 shall not be left in a perched condition as a result of the cleanout and deepening. The invert of the culverts should be embedded 10-15% of their diameters below the finished channel bed after the cleanout and deepening has been undertaken. 6. If present, downstream flow shall be maintained at all times. 7. The cleanout must follow the original watercourse route and shall be as narrow as possible. 8. All spoil (sediment) removed from the channel shall be stabilized to prevent re-entry into the watercourse and once dry the spoil shall be spread into the adjacent agricultural fields. Spoil should not be deposited in any watercourses, floodplains, wetlands, woodlots or on any slopes without obtaining permission from this office. 9. All disturbed areas shall be stabilized and re-vegetated to prevent erosion and sedimentation. 10. Appropriate in-channel sediment and erosion control measures shall be properly installed and maintained during the cleanout and deepening. 11. All activities, including equipment maintenance procedures, shall be controlled to prevent the entry of petroleum products, debris, or other deleterious substances into the watercourse. Refueling and maintenance of equipment shall be conducted away from the watercourse. 12. This permit grants permission for the cleanout and deepening of a portion of the existing open Anness Municipal Drain (Municipal Drain # 9), and establishing outlets for the proposed Branch A and Branch B buried tiles. If any other work is proposed in this area in the future, the SVCA should be contacted, as permission may be required. BURNSIDE (THE DIFFERENCE IS OUR PEOPLE] Appendix G Drawings — Plan — Main Drain (No. MCW179390 -1) — Plan — Branch A & B (No. MCW179390 -2) — Profile — Main Drain (No. MCW179390-3) — Profile — Branch A (No. MCW179390-4) — Profile — Branch B (No. MCW179390 -5) II -- .. 1 VAC IA\ R-D . ; " r — o BM#1 L. ' �C7.LD: k 4..4- N) ,�,A. • C. MCCULLOCH s g : -143 D r . +.t:Al :J. MCCULLOCH j �- a 0 ,,, '..I 3 -145 :. 1— si Art ...,=• . N w TH ONTARIO I ' O J .A. & J.F. ` N W,0 0 +450 0 +31i +. J « 0 PENINSULA , ALLEN 9p ' V�1E� BAS 7y � . 0 w t „. FARMS LTD , 3 -092 BM#4 0 -1-6 6 ,r `' � a I 3 -04510 L }342.. ,i .BM #3 O ; " 0 J / _�1BM#5 0- B +077 A � _s N F � BM#6 M.H. WHITE :M 9 `°' I .,A 3 -093 0 2 # � ; 11 11.: �BM # 10 I . \v ' - A. 0 (� ONTARIO „ CO P . G . & B . BO +358 A0 +364 *' IL D PENINSULA ' BURNS ' _ FARMS STD .t , `� 3 -045 m 0 AREA UNDERDRAINED 2 -26510 / ! BANK FARMS INC. / m0 INTO WATERSHED 0--01 .. B ��, / z MI 0 3- 095 -20 A. AVEYV\� . / , II p - -u SONS LTD. v e . O ""` { F - :.^•° 1. in ` �2 -266` ONTARIO ' �\� N `. PENINSULA LTD / ° N 1 FARMS f f *:. CO 3 -046 ( Fa Y' ti , — kd. ;� ` K. VALLEE N tp Z +j' 3 -095 � < K. ELLIOTT ® F ,� .6 r r `. 3 -047 @ .. _. & M. CALDWELL r Z r Is OM v le D 3 -149 PLAN u 1 0 ® s CA 6.1 ' CA I o � , CA MAIN DRAIN \ (D . A. DAVEY & -' " 0 Z , J. HORN 0 MD # 9 ANNESS 0 SONS LTC. 1 y 3 -096 MUNICIPALITY OF 2 -267 ` 4 i (� S I D E R 0 A D 3 0 ___; COUNTY F BRUCE I R. cc J. DJ' ON , " .It o /o ., , O 0 0 0 `r SCALE 0000 / � a VV o .... f.` �•' I ® �� CI ^ O ^� DWG. No. MCW179390 - 1 OF 5 0 / ' '� —, `/ `, DATE APRIL 2011 1 \ - BURNSIDE LOT 27 0 +315 CONCESSION 11 J.A. & J.F. �, nO ■ ALLEN \v\ 0 +450 • 3- 092 / . '70 �. 055 X BM #4 / ♦ . O BM #2 00 ■ # 0-63 g oko0° ♦ ♦ ♦. 1 ♦ , ♦ BM #3 ♦♦ 4 ♦ _ /B0 +077 *1 ♦ DICE 4 PART LOT 28 BM 5 ♦ ♦♦ DICB A0+141 CONCESSION 11 # ♦ ■ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ BM # ■ i M.H. WHITE , ♦ Q� ■ 3 -093 ..� �P \e BM #10 II ■ II #•• ■ BM #8 ♦ w ■ _ DICB ■ DICB __ B0 +358 A0 +364 PART LOT 28 ■ CONCESSION 11 ■ PLAN at B . BRANCH A B i MD # 9 ANNESS BAVIK MUNICIPALITY OF . KINCARDINE 3-09 FARMS INC. . COUNTY OF BRUCE 3- 095 -20 • SCALE 1.250 • DWG. No. MCWI79390 — 2 OF 5 • DA1E: APRIL 2011 • !i BURNSIDE X x Ct� Q O m N .- .- . . . . to m n N CO n 0 M CO 0 CO N 0 1.1 n M CI 1Lw N . - . - N 6 d N M M M M M M O O d M N O 6 a 0_' 0 OX o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qo w Q w L26 C12 L27 C12 J. & C. L27 C11 J.A. & J.F. ALLEN (519- 353 -4012) o-- - CONCESSION ROAD 10/11 MCCULLOCH J. MCCULLOCH (519- 353 -5646) (519 - 353 -5646) MAIN DRAIN I I I 264 - -- - --- --- --- ----- - ------ - - - - -- - 264 I 263 - I 263 262 - - - _-- - - - - -- I- 262 1 ' X ' -8mW J �CSFA 261 - -- - - -- -- -- --- - - -- - - - - - -- 261 1 260 — - - - - -- -� -------------- - - - - -- -- - - -- - 260 259 -- -- --- - ----- --- ___ - -_- 4 r - --- , , 259 ' - BENCHMARKS 258 - -- --- - - - - -- -- 7 ... - , BM #1: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA 0 +077 258 EXISTING TOP r o/s RIGHT OF DRAIN OF BANK ,---.--- -' ELEV. 254.90 257 - - - - -- ------- - - -- N 257 1.1 mH x 1.8mW BM #2: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA 0 +315 CSPA ; ' - /'- m o/s LEFT OF DRAIN ---- - - - -__ __ __ _ ___ 256 NATURAL WATERCOURSE - ELEV: 355.30 256 255 - - - • = - - - -- y -i - -- -- PROPOSED NEW BM #3:NAIL IN TREE AT STA 0 +550 o/s LEFT 255 '� - / DITCHBOTTOM FE DRAIN -1 I i-- ELEV: V: 256.15 ' - DITCH BOTTOM 254 -- - -- % t - - = - - - - ~ --- - - -�-�� - --h � -` -- - BM #4: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA 0 +832 254 -r„ , � a N 0/s RIGHT OF DRAIN M N 253 � - u - ---- -- -- CO 01 ELEV: 257.44 253 ' N 0 BM #5: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA 1 +100 252 -- `o N o/s LEFT OF DRAIN 252 N m ELEV: 260.65 PROPOSE BR A /'' N 0 PROPOSED BR B 251 �- -- -- -- m- -- - - - - -- Q - TILE OUTLET - -- -HDPE - TILE OUTLET- - -___. - - - -- ___- - __ -_ 1.34 AIL IN EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT 251 T STA .r C W RIP RAP C/W RIP RAP 1.34 o/s LEFT OF DRAIN ELEV: 262 250 - - CO ° a N PROFILE _. MAIN DRAIN 13 c) I MD # 9 ANNESS I z a MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE E a COUNTY OF ..- 225m 0 0.46% —ma.— 225m 0 0.32% 228m 0 0.32% -0.--x ®1 o 699 n mo 350m 0 0.89% •--,- N ' BRUCE 0 O 0 SCALE H 1:5000 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 1.100 o 0 0 90 O N 010 O s 0 0 NO 0 N o 0 0 0 s 0 < 0 0 Z 0 a - N N (Oro •:1 T In to <o N 00 0) 0) O N N N) M d LC) DWG. No. MCW179390 - 3 OF 5 U + p + + o +O + O+ + + O + + o + + + + ± + ± + + O 0 0 O O O O O O O - - - - DATE APRIL 2011 a N J J -0 CO 3 w.. ao m -Ow r u�w m -a�. r....y.,....� 0 0_ m m i, BURNSIDE X = - X r 1- O H 0_ CO N LO O (0 N N (0 df 00 CO N 0 0 N O I- O_ IX CL CD LU d d (0 to (0 to � 0 r) d 0 N d' D w OO > L27 C11 WEST PART L28 C11 J.A. & J.F. ALLEN M. H. WHITE c... (519-353-4012) (519- 353 -5327) BRANCH A BM #3: NAIL K IN TREE AT STA 0 +550 o/s LEFT 259 — OF DRAIN — 259 ELEV: 256.15 BM #7: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA A0 +140 o/s LEFT OF DRAIN ELEV: 256.54 BM #8: NAIL IN TREE AT STA A0 +350 o/s 258 i LEFT OF DRAIN 258 ELEV: 256.41 I I D 1 257 — 257 I I I I I EX j —_ GROUND OVER NEW TILE 256 256 DICE - 255 _ j 255 r- 254 - �' � N 254 N 1 II -----i I I� 253 0 co in o d- - 253 o to o to d- o rri ri r-i r) r) I I ' Ln M t o to to to M + N -'N -N - I — -- - N - N � +—O II > II II II Q < \I\ \ \\ I o_ 252 I I 252 PROFILE 251 BRANCH A MD # 9 ANNESS MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE COUNTY OF BRUCE 135m X 400mm0 CDT ® 0.20% I -r... o -.-- 223m X 300mm0 CDT 0 0.60% — SCALE: H 1:2500 6m X 500mm0 CSP © 0.30% v 1:500 0 o _ � _ to DWG. No. MCW179390 — 4 OF 5 Z O ++ + + + I + + + U Q 0 0 < < 0 0 < DATE: APRIL 2011 J O Lu... Z J09CpI.FlB s,.tt,, P.o.o.. ,o. may.«.. on,a.. Hoo 2NV c�aea C� d M o !1 BURNSIDE X = I- X = I- O H 0_ co 0) r--. O 0 O 0n M d- a) d- d- O 00 O H G: d W O 0 ; in In LO r (0 to to d' d dl M M d d d' d W O O j 0 - O Z 0- 0 ? " L27 C11 WEST PART L28 C11 - J.A. & J.F. ALLEN o M.H. WHITE o (519- 353 -4012) (519- 353 -5327) BENCHMARKS BM #3: NAIL IN TREE AT STA 0 +550 o/s LEFT BRANCH B' OF DRAIN 260 - ELEV: 256.15 260 BM #9: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA B0 +077 o/s LEFT OF THE DRAIN _ ELEV: 256.85 259 BM #10: NAIL IN FENCE POST AT STA B0 +077 _ 259 o/s RIGHT OF THE DRAIN ELEV: 257.55 BERM 258 - & DICE 258 I I I I 257 7t-\ 257 IE ISTING GROUN OVER N W TILE DICE -- - - 256 ----\ 256 - y - i - I I , 255 _co 255 I I 1 II i u N ___L: II r I A 254 - _ _I 2 254 CD o m In' to o Lo co ro M 253 cII r<i_ri N N _ - 253 II - - PROFILE 252 BRANCH B MD # 9 ANNESS MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE 251 COUNTY OF BRUCE -1:::. 77m X 600mm0 281m X 450mm0 CDT ® 0.65% — HDPE ® 0.20% o SCALE: H 1: 2500 V 1:50 0 N 0 O O O O in o 0 0 N 0 N o DWG. No. MCW179390 - 5 OF 5 Z + + + + 0 0 + 0 U m m m m co m m m DATE: APRIL 2011 0.: 00 J U Z^ L_ in Ld �� R BURNSIDE