HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 036 Natural Heritage Study (North-South Environmental Inc) Agreement
e
e
e
e
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE
BY-LAW
NO. 2008 - 036
BEING A BY-LAW TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT TO CONDUCT A
NATURAL HERITAGE STUDY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE
(North-South Environmental Inc.)
WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 as amended,
Section 8 (1) and 9 provide that the powers of a municipality under this or any
other Act shall be interpreted broadly so as to confer broad authority on the
municipality to enable the municipality to govern its affairs as it considers
appropriate and to enhance the municipality's ability to respond to municipal
issues and a municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a
natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under this or any other
Act;
AND WHEREAS Section 3 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 states that
the Minister rnay from time to time issue policy statements that have been
approved by the Lieutenant Governor in Council on matters relating to municipal
planning that in the opinion of the Minister are of provincial interest;
AND WHEREAS Provincial Policy statements were issued under Section 3 of the
Planning Act and came into effect on March 1, 2005;
AND WHEREAS in accordance with the above Provincial Policy statements the
new local Official Plan states the need for a Natural Heritage Study to be
completed for the entire Municipality;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Kincardine deems it expedient
to enter into an agreement with North-South Environmental Inc. to conduct a
Natural Heritage Study for the Municipality of Kincardine area;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of
Kincardine ENACTS as follows:
1. That The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine enter into an
agreement with North-South Environmental Inc. to conduct a Natural
Heritage Study within the Municipality.
2. That the Consultant (North-South Environmental Inc.) shall perform these
services for an amount not exceeding $53,319.00 including GST.
3.
That the Mayor and CAO be authorized to sign and affix the Corporate
Seal, on behalf of The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine, the
agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A".
4.
This by-law shall come into full force and effect upon its final passage.
. . ./2
e
e
e
e
Page 2
Natural Heritage Study (North-South Environmental Inc.) Agreement By-law
By-law No. 2008 - 036
5.
This by-law may be cited as the "Natural Heritage Study (North-South
Environmental Inc.) Agreement By-law".
FIRST, and SECOND time this 19th day of March, 2008
C-- 9_"""-8T
Clerk
READ a THIRD time and FINALLY PASSED this 19th day of March, 2008.
~1~"~
Cle
.
This is Schedule" B- " to By-Law
No.JCO'6- 01\, !,"csed the .J9.fu. day
o;tg~ . I ~6G\l D,s__1~
~ -- -Clerk ~
THIS AGREEMENT MADE THIS I"th DAY OF Ma:rc},
,2008
BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAL TIY OF KINCARDINE
(the "Municipality")
-and-
NORTH-SOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
(the "Consultant")
For the provision of professional services to complete a Natural Heritage Study for the
Municipality of Kincardine.
North-South Environmental Inc. shall carry out the work in accordance with the RFP
Submission attached as Schedule 'A' dated January 31, 2008.
North-South Environmentallnc is retained to deliver the results as listed in Schedule A.
North-South Environmental Inc agrees to furnish and perform professional services in
the preparation of the work as set out in Schedule 'A' for an amount not exceeding
$50,780.00 plus GST.
NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants hereinafter
contained the parties hereto do covenant and agree each with the other as follows:
SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS
In this Agreement:
1.1 "Consultant" means North-South Environmentallnc
1.2 "Municipality" means the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine
SECTION 2 - THE CONSULTANT'S SERVICES
2.1 General Services
The Consultant agrees to furnish and perform professional services in the
preparation of the work as set out in Schedule 'A'. Said Schedule 'A' is attached
hereto and forms part of this Agreement.
The Consultant shall perform these services for an amount not exceeding
$53,319.00 broken down as follows:
Total Professional Fees
Total Disbursements
Project Cost
GST 5%
Total Project Cost
$47,180.00
$3,600.00
$50,780.00
$2,539.00
$53,319.00
Page1of6
~
2.2 Specific Services
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Consultant agrees to perform
the following services:
(a) Performance
The Consultant shall exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in
performing the services set out herein.
(b) Confidentiality
The Consultant shall keep strictly confidential any personal or confidential
information communicated to or acquired by the Consultant during the course
of completing the Project.
(c) Return of Documents
The Consultant shall, upon completion of the work, return all documents and
materials provided by the Municipality as well as documents generated on
behalf of the Municipality over the course of the Project.
2.3 Errors and Omissions
The Consultant agrees that any corrections of errors and omiSSions will be
provided at no additional cost to the Municipality, during a period of three months
after the final submission of the study provided that the required corrections
relate directly to the work program as described in attached Schedule 'A'.
SECTION 3 - THE MUNICIPALITY'S RESPONSIBILITY
3.1 Fiscal Responsibilities
The Municipality shall review and comment on all aspects of the Project as
described in Schedule 'A'.
The Municipality shall be fiscally responsible for all costs as described in
Schedule 'A' associated with the Project.
SECTION 4 - FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS
4.1 Fees
The Municipality agrees and covenants with the Consultant that the Consultant
having in all respects complied with the provisions of this Contract, will be paid
for and in respect of the works a sum not exceeding $50,780.00 plus GST as
follows:
$10,156 + GST Upon approval of the Study Work Plan by the Study Steering
Committee.
$ 10,156 + GST Upon approval of the completion of background information/data
collection phase by the Study Steering Committee.
$10,156 + GST Upon clearance of the confirmed Science Methodology by the
Science Committee.
$ 10,156 + GST Upon clearance of the Science Committee of the Preliminary
Report.
$10,156 + GST upon approval of the final report by the Study Steering
Committee.
J
Page 2 016
4.2 Accounting
Billings will be submitted in accordance with the fee schedule outlined in Section
4.1 and sent to The Municipality of Kincardine attention of Building and Planning
Manager. Payment to the Consultant will be made within thirty days of receipt by
the Municipality.
4.3 Additional Services
If during the term of agreement, additional work is required outside of the scope
of the contract as listed in Schedule 'A', the Consultant shall not proceed with
additional work, or incur additional expenses, without the written authorization of
the Municipality.
SECTION 5 - GENERAL CONDITIONS
5.1 Right of Use
The Project material and report shall be performed and completed for the sole
benefit of the Municipality which shall have the exclusive right to utilize and
reproduce the material therein as the Municipality may see fit. The Municipality
shall, however, acknowledge the Consultant's authorship of any material
contained in the report which the Municipality may reproduce in either original or
abbreviated form in any publication which it may issue or cause to be issued. All
documents and material prepared pursuant to contract are the property of the
Municipality.
5.1.1 Copyright of Project Reports, etc.
No report, document, or other data produced in whole or in part with project
funds shall be copyrighted by the Consultant; neither shall any notice or
copyright be registered by the Consultant in connection with any report,
document, or other data developed by him for the project. The Municipality
reserves all rights for copyright of all reports, documents and other material
developed for the project.
5.2 Adherence to Time Schedules
The services of the Consultant are to commence as soon as practicable after
execution of this Agreement.
The Consultant shall carry out the work with the utmost dispatch and subject to
delays beyond its control, shall complete the work in accordance with Schedule
'A' or any subsequent revision that may be required.
5.3 Dismissal Clause
In the event that the work performed by the Consultant is unsatisfactory to the
Municipality, this agreement may be terminated by the Municipality upon notice
to the Consultant and payment will be made to the Consultant for work performed
to that date.
5.4 Upset Limit
The upset limit for carrying out this project as specified in Schedule 'A' is
$50,780.00 plus GST. No funds above that limit are to be paid for work carried
out by the Consultant unless prior written approval is given by the Municipality.
Page 3of6
~(
5.5 Notices
All notices, requests and other communications required in writing in this
Agreement shall be deemed to have been duly given at the time of delivery or
two days after the day of mailing if mailed by first class mail postage prepaid and
addressed.
5.6 Non-Assignment Clause
The Consultant will not assign this Agreement or any part of it without first
obtaining the prior written approval of the Municipality, which approval may be
withheld by the Municipality in its sole discretion, or given subject to such terms
and conditions as the Municipality may impose.
The Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Municipality from and
against all suits, judgements, claims, demands, expenses actions, causes of
action and losses and for any and all liability for damages to property and injury
to persons (including death) which the Municipality may incur, otherwise than by
reason of their own negligence or willful misconduct, as a result of or arising out
of or in relation to any breach of the terms of this Agreement, or the
Municipality's own negligence or willful misconduct.
5.7 Insurance
The Consultant shall put in effect and maintain in its name, at its expense, all the
necessary insurance that would be considered appropriate for a prudent
consultant undertaking this type of agreement for the period during which the
Agreement is in effect with insurers acceptable to the Municipality, including:
1. General Liability Insurance, professional liability and property damage to an
inclusive limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per
occurrence. The policy shall include:
a) The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine as an additional
insured;
b) Cross liability
c) Contractual liability;
d) A thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation
2. The Consultant shall provide the Municipality with a valid Certificate of Insurance
as evidence of the above coverage upon signing the agreement. The Consultant
shall provide the Municipality with any renewal replacement certificates as may
be necessary during the term of the Agreement
5.8 Personnel
The Consultant shall assign the following personnel to perform the work referred
to in this Agreement
Project Manager - Brent Tegler Ph.D. (North-South Environmental)
Project advisor - Ken Ursic M.Sc. (Dougan and Associates)
Study Team Leader - Sarah Mainguy M.Sc. (North-South Environmental)
Technical Assistant - Sarah Piett B.Sc. (North-South Environmental)
Public Facilitation Team Leader - Margot Ursic M.Sc. (Dougan and Associates)
GIS Applications - Richard Czok B.Sc. (North-South Environmental)
l
Page 4 016
5.9 Notice
For the purposes of this agreement, notice shall be provided as follows:
TO THE MUNICIPALITY:
Michele Barr, MAA.T.O, CBO
Building and Planning Manager
Municipality of Kincardine
1475 Concession 5,
R.R. #5, Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6
TO THE CONSULTANT:
Brent Tegler, PhD
Project Manager
North - South Environmental Inc.
35 Crawford Crescent, Suite U5, P.O. Box 518
Campbellville, ON LOP 1 BO
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED this ~C\j-h day of March A.D. 2008
NORTH-SOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Brent Tegler PhD, Secr t I Treasurer
I/we have authority to bind the Corporation
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPLAITY OF
KINCARDINE
cR~~~-
Mayor - a Kraemer
~-S~:.-\ ~ ~ ~r,< ,'<" r~-<<d .
Chief Administrative Officer - John deRosenroll
We have the authority to bind the Corporation
Page 5 of6
"U
Q)
'"
CD
0>
o
-
0>
'>
::I:
III
"en
::TO
::ll::I:
."I1m
"'CO
lIIe
Cr
um
3
-.>
III
III
o'
::l
-
.
r-------
I
I
I I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
)
-@l-
f
s
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists In Sustainable Landscape Planning
Natural Heritage Study for the Town
of Kincardine
N
)
-@l~
f
s
~
A PROPOSAL FOR THE COUNTY OF BRUCE
January 31st, 2008
-
~
- ~
...~~.\.,.,.~
" .~
Prepared by:
North - South Environmental Inc.
35 Crawford Crescent, Suite US, P.O. Box 518
Camphellville, ON LOP 1 BO
In Collaboration with:
DOUGAN & ASSOCIATES
Ecological Consulting & Design
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
)
-~--
f
s
\ f<-() ~,:-t.
r \\... Jv
I J\\'<' ;.<.1
\--.'
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Mr. David Smith
County of Bruce
30 Park street, P.O. Box 848,
Walkerton, ON
NOG 2VO
Re. Proposal for Municipality of Kincardine Natural Heritage Study
Dear Mr. Smith,
We are pleased to submit our proposal for developing a Natural Heritage System for the Town of
Kincardine. We have assembled a study team of two firms highly experienced in developing
terrestrial NHS systems and in public consultation with respect to issues of Natural Heritage:
North-South Environmental Inc. and Dougan & Associates. These two firms have performed
tasks similar to those you describe in many municipalities in Ontario. We would be higWy
interested in performing this work.
Yours Very Truly,
L~ 1c.~
7~
Sarah Mainguy (Ecologist)
'(, c;:~, f '. j U
35 Crawford Crescent, Suite US, PO. Box 518, Campbellville, ON, Canada LOP 180
Ph: 905-854-1112 Fx: 905-854~0001 www.nsenvironmental.com
@
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Table of Contents
1.0 Understanding of the Study .................................................................................................... I
2.0 Study Approach .... .......... ..... ..... ...... ....... ..... ........... ........... ...... ..... .... ..... ........... ...... ..... ....... ..... 2
2.1 Ensuring the Study is based on Defensible Scientific Principals ................................... 2
2.2 NHS within the Town of Kincardine and Lakeshore Areas ........................................... 3
2.3 An Ecosystem-Based, Landscape Approach ..................................................................3
2.4 Consultation......... ..... ..... ...... ..... ...... ............ ..... ..... ...... .......... ..... ..... ..... ...... ........... .......... 4
3.0 Scope of Work - Key Tasks ...................................................................................................5
Task I: Information and Methodology Review .....................................................................5
Task 3: First Stakeholder Consultation...................................................................................7
Task 4: Implementation of Work Plan and Science Methodology........................................ 8
Task 5: Determination of Representation ..............................................................................9
Task 6: Consultation. ..... ..... ...... ..... ...... ...... ..... ........... ...... ...... ..... .......... ..... ...... ..... ...... .......... 10
Task 8: Field Work to Refine Information within the Lakeshore/Ecodistrict 6E-2 Area.... II
Task 9: Preparation of Final Study Report ........................................................................... 12
3.1 Project Schedule...... .......... ...... ....... ..... ........... ........... ...... ..... ..... .... ............ ...... .............. 12
4.0 Costs............ .............. ................. ...... ...... ........... ..... ........... ................ .......... ............ ...... ........ 15
5.0 Study Team. ..... ..... ..... ..... ........... ...... ...... ...... .......... ...... ............ ..... .... ...... ..... ...... ..... ....... ....... 17
5.1 Profile and Experience .................................................................................... .............. 19
5.1.1 List of Sub-Consultants.......................................................................................20
5.1.2 Staff Roles and Experience ................................................................................. 21
5.2 References. .......... ...... ........... ..... ....... ........... .......... ....... ..... ..... .... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... 17
5.2.1 Value Added Services ......................................................................................... 23
5.2.2 Additional Information on Representative Projects............................................ 23
6.0 Deliverables............ ..... ........... ...... ...... ........... ...... .... ...... ....... ..... ..... .......... ...... ..... ....... ...... .... 27
7.0 Conflicts of Interest Statement. ........... ................. ..... ............ ...... .... ..... ...... ...... ..... ...... .......... 28
Kincardine Natural Heritage System Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
1.0 UNDERSTANDING OF THE STUDY
In southern Ontario, land use changes have resulted in large-scale conversion of the pre-
settlement landscape initially into agriculture, and subsequently into more intensive land uses
associated with recreational, urban and industrial development. The growth of small towns and
previously rural areas in southern Ontario to accommodate the increasing population is placing
stress on the natural environment. The fragmentation of the natural landscape creates an
environment which has reduced biological diversity, and particularly reduced populations of
species that required large unbroken patches of habitat, or are intolerant of disturbance. Over the
long term, biodiversity will continue to decline in unconnected natural areas, owing to the
inability of many species to re-establish populations once they are extirpated (often as a result of
random natural events or pressure from urban development).
The Natural Heritage Systems (NHS) approach is a land use planning tool intended to mitigate
the impacts and stresses associated with development. It involves establishing a protected
system that consists of core areas connected by functional ecological linkages. A natural
heritage system may consist of a diversity of landscape types: meadows, woodlands, wetlands,
rivers and lakes. The system of connected core areas protects significant features and functions,
preserves and hopefully improves biodiversity, and accommodates the'natural movement of
plants and animals that is necessary for their long term viability. It derives from an
understanding that individual areas and features have strong ecological ties to each other, as well
as to physical attributes ofthe overall landscape. Thus Natural Heritage Systems seek to reverse
the impacts offragmentation caused by large scale development and provide sufficient habitat to
support populations of native plants and animals in the very long term (greater than 100 years).
The use of natural heritage systems places a strong emphasis on the maintenance of the
ecological functions that sustain biodiversity. Its intention is to improve on feature-based land
use planning. For example, a natural heritage system will consider the protection of surface and
groundwater elements required to sustain a wetland feature, and thus may extend protection
limits beyond the boundaries of the wetland. Similarly, a natural heritage system will seek to
identify and preserve functional connections among natural features and areas to sustain the
movement of flora and fauna that may be required as part of daily, seasonal, annual and/or long
term movement patterns. There is support for a natural heritage system approach in Section
2.1.2 of the PPS (2005):
"The diversity and connectivity of natural features in an area, and the long-term ecological
function and biodiversity of natural heritage systems, should be maintained, restored or, where
possible, improved, recognizing linkages between and amonKnatural heritage features and
areas, surface water features and ground water features." (PPS 2005, pg. 15)
Natural Heritage System: means a system made up of natural heritage features and areas,
linked by natural corridors which are necessary to maintain biological and geological diversity,
natural functions, viable populations of indigenous species and ecosystems. These systems
include lands that have been restored and areas with the potential to be restored to a natural state.
(Provincial Policy Statement Definition)
Italics indicate words or phrases defined in the 2005 PPS.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 1
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainahle Landscape Planning
The environmental consulting team of North-South Environmental Inc. (NSE) and Dougan &
Associates (D&A) has considerable expertise in municipal natural heritage planning, as well as
experience with criteria-based approaches to identification of significant features (using GIS)
and a solid grounding in current scientific principles in landscape and conservation biology. The
firms are also familiar with relevant natural heritage planning policies and how various
municipalities are working to conform to them, and have been involved in numerous workshops
and community consultations dealing with these issues. This will ensure an in-depth review of
background materials, science-based development and application of appropriate criteria and
meaningful consultation with stakeholders.
The team ofNSE and D&A have worked together on previous projects where we felt a project
would benefit from a collaborative effort that brings our collective experience and shared
resources together. We are confident that this union provides the best possible product in the
shortest reasonable timeframe. We are currently working together on a project to delineate
significant wildlife habitat and significant woodlands, often some ofthe most important
components of Natural Heritage Systems, within the Region of Peel. D&A and NSE also
worked together over 2006-2007 for the City of Toronto to provide revised assessments of ESAs
in the former City boundaries and PSWs within the current City, and are currently working
together again to identify candidate ESAs in the current City of Toronto, verify ANSI
boundaries, and conduct some research on migratory bird activity and habitat in the City. Our
firms have also, separately, conducted extensive natural heritage work for predominantly rural
areas facing issues similar to those of the County of Bruce, such as the Towns ofInnisfil and
Pickering, and Region of Waterloo, as well as intensive urban areas such as the cities of
Mississauga and Brampton. Our team would look forward to the opportunity to bring our
expertise to the County of Bruce.
2.0 STUDY APPROACH
2.1 Ensuring the Study is based on Defensible Scientific Principals
Defensibility of the criteria for assessing the significance of woodlands, wetlands, valley lands,
and wildlife habitat, and the linkages among them, will form the framework of the terrestrial
Natural Heritage System (NHS). These criteria will be developed for the purpose of identifying
the NHS and will not necessarily define significant features with respect to the Provincial Policy
Statement.
Defensibility will be critical for the implementation of policies protecting the NHS in the Official
Plan. This is especially so if the expectation is that securement of key areas of the Natural
Heritage System will be achieved through the development process. Having been involved in
OMB hearings throughout southern Ontario, we are well aware of the cost and inconvenience of
Board hearings. The protection of Natural Heritage Resources, including woodlands and wildlife
habitat, have been key issues at these hearings and team members have been principally involved
in developing strategies to present to the Board the value of natural heritage systems in the
context of County strategies to protect biodiversity. We have found this approach is
scientifically defensible and is supported by published literature and unpublished reports.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.,........,.....................,............,.,...,.......................,........,........,.,.....,.,.,.,.............. page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Recently, the Board ruled in favour of an NHS that was developed within the Town of Oakville,
and which secured open tableland for linkage among patches. NSE provided key testimony that
assisted the Board in coming to this decision. There is a high probability that the NHS- Terr
study report may eventually form an important technical document that could be entered into
evidence in Board hearings and scrutinized in cross examination. We suggest that it may be
worthwhile to consult the County's solicitor even at this early stage, to think well in advance of
how information and documentation can be used to benefit the County and area municipalities at
future Board appearances.
2.2 NHS within the Town of Kincardine and Lakeshore Areas
There is an unequal distribution of natural areas in the Town, with greater forest cover present in
Ecodistrict 6E-2, near the shoreline. Many significant features are associated with the Lake
Huron shoreline, including Species at Risk that may be protected by federal and/or (as of June)
provincial legislation, and would be protected for any development requiring approval under the
Planning Act according to the Provincial Policy Statement. As discussed in the RFP, this is also
the area where development pressure is greatest. As in most parts of southern Ontario, tableland
ecosystems associated with the best agricultural soils are currently under-represented within
protected area networks. In both areas of this study, there will be a need to recognize differences
in the proportion of natural areas remaining within intensively developing areas and those
communities where agricultural practices will continue for the foreseeable future. As well, the
representation of the full range of historic ecosystems that contribute to biodiversity in the
County must be considered. This may include consideration of the contribution ecological
restoration may make to a future Natural Heritage System. However, we understand the need to
consider the Kincardine study area in a different context from the lakeshore study area. We
suggest ways to address this issue throughout the proposal, which could include the following:
· mapping the features of the LakeshorelEcoregion 6E-2 area at a finer scale than the
Kincardine study area;
· strengthening the information on the Lakeshore study area with ground-truthing;
· possibly tailoring certain criteria specifically to the Lakeshore/6E-2 area (e.g. patch size);
and
· recommending EIS policies that require a greater level of rigour and information detail in
the Lakeshore area.
2.3 An Ecosystem-Based, Landscape Approach
North-South Environmental Inc. and Dougan & Associates are two firms that have long
promoted the adoption of an ecosystem approach to protection of natural heritage. The
ecosystem approach goes beyond a simple inventory of the earth and life science components
and instead relies on a solid understanding of the eeolordeal relationshivs that exist among
ecosystem components essential to maintaining long term ecological integrity and viability of
individuals, populations and communities of species. Understanding the dynamic nature of
ecosystems provides an important basis for understanding the significance of woodlands within
the larger landscape and understanding how to define the wildlife habitat which is significant to
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 3
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
individual organisms and populations as they persist in over time within the range oflandscapes
essential to their survival.
2.4 Consultation
Consultation at all levels is a core component of this project, and it is clear from the RFP that the
County recognizes the importance of providing information and opportunities to comment to as
broad a spectrum as possible. In order to achieve this objective effectively within a relatively short
timeline we propose:
. Conducting the bulk of the meetings with the Science Committee and Study Steering Committee
at the outset ofthe project, wherever feasible, to establish basic consensus on the most
appropriate criteria and best approach to identification of landscape criteria before draft materials
are presented to the broader public and stakeholder groups (as presented in our Timeline).
. In all meetings providing a clear distinction between the approach for the Lakeshore as opposed
to the remainder ofthe study area;
. Conducting two stakeholder meetings and workshops: the first to present the methodology and
solicit feedback, and then the second to present draft results of the draft Natural Heritage System
mapping. We hope to establish the basis for landowner contact during both meetings in order to
initiate field work in areas of the Lakeshore.
. Development of clear and concise materials, particularly for public consultations and workshops
(e.g., slide presentations coupled with posters and information sheets), that can also be posted to
the County and Town's websites.
. Preparation of a simple survey to solicit feedback that can be circulated at all public meetings and
workshops, and also posted to the County and Town's website.
. Continuity of staff at the various meetings to ensure that all feedback from the Study Committees
and the public are integrated into draft and final products, and to ensure that the staff present at
the public meetings and workshops can address all technical issues and concerns that may arise.
In our Team's experience, the most effective means of encouraging long-term involvement is
through developing good working relationships among various stakeholders. We therefore
recommend that though the consulting team will take on the bulk of the tasks associated with
stal<eholder consultation, Town and County staff work with our Public Consultation Coordinator,
Margot Ursic. Tasks would include: assisting with meeting coordination and logistics, and possibly
attending the information centre/workshop components and, if interested, acting as an assistant
facilitator. Involving County and Town staff in the process will also allow for a more
comprehensive approach than can be delivered by consultants alone. In addition to making the
typical announcements of public meetings in papers, the County of Bruce and Town of Kincardine
will be asked to either provide or circulate (via email) notices of meetings to the Stakeholder Forum.
It is anticipated that the County will coordinate the locations and be responsible for advertising for
public meetings, and providing refreshments if appropriate. Our team Public Consultation
Coordinator will develop and provide final consultation materials, as well as recording minutes for
the meetings.
Notably, our timeline assumes that feedback from the Science Committee will be provided within 2
weeks of proposed meeting dates. Once this feedback has been integrated, proposed approaches,
criteria and mapping for the Natural Heritage System can be presented to the public.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
For this project, particularly for the public I stakeholder meetings and workshops, we understand that
it will be critical to take the somewhat complex topics of criteria-based assessment approaches, and
of defining significant areas as defined by the PPS, and communicate these to people without
ecological backgrounds. (Samples of public consultation materials developed for other projects are
provided in the appendices). Our team has the expertise to undertake such a task.
Finally, although agreement among all parties is rarely possible, we feel it is important that feedback
obtained through the consultation process is respected and integrated, where possible, into revisions
to reports and mapping. Where this is not feasible, feedback should still be recorded and
acknowledged in the Final Report in some manner.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK - KEY TASKS
Task 1: Information and Methodology Review
The Study Team will first undertake a review ofthe criteria used in the Oxford Natural Heritage
System study. We will apply the considerable combined experience of our two firms to
determine if that methodology is appropriate in the light of the ecological and social issues of the
larger Bruce County in general, and Kincardine, especially the Lakeshore pressure area, in
particular. As an internal team we will discuss other methodologies that in our experience are
equally scientifically defensible. Tasks I and 2 are likely to overlap to some extent, as reviewing
digital mapping information (described as Task 2) will to some extent inform Task 1. However,
the two are described separately here for the sake of clarity. After the start-up meeting, relevant
background information (per the RFP, Section 7) will be reviewed and summarized to provide
current context in terms of provincial, Regional and local legislation, plans, policies and
guidelines. Our firms are already familiar with the PPS (2005) and supporting guidelines
(Natural Heritage Reference Manual 1999, Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guideline), as
well as the approach used in Oxford County's Natural Heritage System (NSE is currently
retained by the Province and is assisting with the development of a revised Natural Heritage
Reference Manual). Additional technical papers will be consulted for comparison, such as the
TRCA's Draft Natural Heritage Strategy (2007), and Caledon's Woodland Policy Review will be
considered along with the Seaton Natural Heritage System, the York Region Natural Heritage
System, and the Middlesex Natural Heritage System, and others such the City of Toronto' s ESA
Discussion Paper (NSE), the Region of Waterloo's ESL Study (D&A), the City of Guelph's
Natural Heritage Strategy (D&A).
This review will provide guidance on whether there is any reason to modify the approach
suggested in the Terms of Reference (Oxford County's NHS approach). We would like to
ensure that we do not accept the Oxford County methodology without a strong scientific
rationale, and a demonstration that it is appropriate for application in the study areas: the Town
of Kincardine and especially the Lakeshore/Ecoregion 6E-2 area. Documents will be examined
specifically for components supporting the development of Natural Heritage Systems,
particularly Significant Woodlands, Significant Valleylands and Significant Wildlife Habitat
criteria identification, with an emphasis of appropriate criteria and approaches. However, we
recognize that the patches that constitute an NHS do not necessarily need to be significant
individually, as it is their ecological role within a system which more relevant. We will explore
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 5
North-South Environmentallnc,
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Pfanning
the possibility of modifying the approach for the Lakeshore/Ecoregion 6E-2 study areas.
Appropriate criteria will likely be similar at both upper tier (Kincardine) and lower tier
(Lakeshore/6E-2) levels, but the thresholds or scales for the various criteria will likely need to be
tailored to the different scales of the jurisdictions and the differences in their respective levels of
natural cover. For example, the size of woodland which is important to include within an NHS
may differ in predominantly urban areas with low percent forest cover as opposed to rural areas
with high percent forest cover.
The two most problematical criteria used in the Oxford County Natural Heritage Study are those
relating to representation. To determine representation, there must be some vegetation
classification (for example to separate mixed, coniferous and deciduous forest); information that
is currently only available at a very coarse level (satellite imagery) over most of the study area.
Using the satellite imagery to refine vegetation classification requires a considerable amount of
aerial photo interpretation and field checking to determine where it can inform boundaries on
ortho-imagery; both labour intensive tasks. We will discuss representation with the Science
Committee and determine whether it is feasible at this stage, possibly at a preliminary level.
In the identification of ecological function, the challenge is to assess fundamentally complex
ecological systems in a comprehensive manner using criteria that are scientifically defensible
while also being relatively simple and easy to apply. Even when apparently simple criteria are
applied there can be challenges in determining what constitutes the boundaries of a woodland
and/or wildlife habitat "patch" to be evaluated;
· the transition from one community type to another is often not distinct due to natural
transitions along environmental gradients;
· one community may be interrupted by an inclusion, gaps and/or breaks of a different
community or land use type; and
· early successional and/or cultural communities have the potential to be transformed over time
through natural succession processes and/or active restoration to become mature community
types which may be of greater significance.
Task 2: Preparation of Methodological Summary, Confirmation of Methodology
We will present a review of the methods at a meeting with the Science Committee, where we
will discuss a written summary prepared for their review. The key deliverables from this
exercise will be:
1. Identification of recommended criteria for identification of criteria for the NHS, with a focus
on (a) Significant Woodlands, (b) Significant Wildlife Habitat, and (c) Significant
Valleylands (these criteria will be developed for the purpose of identifying the NHS and will
not necessarily define significant features as they stand alone with respect to the Provincial
Policy Statement). We will provide a spreadsheet that clearly compares criteria from
different jurisdictions, with a clear rationale for a preferred option.
2. Provision of a discussion paper detailing the methods that can be provided to the Study
Steering Committee for their review. This summary will be written so it can be incorporated
into the preliminary report.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.,.,.,.,...,.,...,....................,.,.....................,..........,.........,.,...,................................ page 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmentallnc,
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
The methodological summary will present the results of our review in Task 1 that examined the
best available science, examples of provincial and municipal technical reports and legislation and
the data available for assessment within the County of Bruce, In terms of approaches for
identifying Significant Woodlands, our team has already undertaken comparable exercises for
the Region of York and the City of London, and will build on these approaches in the
development of criteria based on best science, consultation with the Science Committee and
Study Steering Committee and public stakeholders, and consideration of current and historic
woodlands that characterize Bruce County,
We have also had experience in developing guidelines for defining Significant Valleylands
through work with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo,
The identification of Significant Wildlife Habitat on a regional scale is relatively untested in
southern Ontario, and so the approach here would by necessity be a novel one, However, MNR
guideline documents such as the ORMCP Technical Paper 2 on Significant Wildlife Habitat
(2007), NHRM (OMNR 1999, and the Significant Wildlife Technical Guide (OMNR 2000)
provide very sound guidance that we believe will direct an approach for this study, at least in
part. Initially, woodland and wetland mapping (and other mapping if available) would be
utilized in conjunction with additional mapping of identifying available habitat to discern what
may be considered significant features related to, for example:
. seasonal concentration areas (MNR);
· rare vegetation communities where this information is available (i,e" ELC communities
screened against NHIC rankings for rare community types) that may ultimately be habitat
for rare wildlife;
· habitat that sustains higher concentrations of species of conservation concern (e,g. those
becoming a concern in the Town or the County because of population declines or habitat
sensiti vi ty);
. habitat critical for breeding, foraging, overwintering, etc,;
· habitat that supports species that are habitat demanding in terms of "interior conditions",
distance from human habitation (i.e, wildness), or have specific and/or unique habitat
requirements;
· habitat requirements in relation to meeting the needs of long term genetic viability as
related to minimum viable populations,
Once we have determined a long list of potential criteria for significance, we will subject them to
a greater level of scrutiny. This scrutiny will include:
. Determination of the accuracy of the data, and whether they are sufficiently current;
. Preliminary determination of the continued quality of the natural area (based on on-line
viewing); and
. Final fit with the proposed current criteria,
Task 3: First Stakeholder Consultation
The first public consultation meeting will be held as a Stakeholder Forum Information Centre
and workshop, after the Science Committee has cleared the methodology. We propose to use
visual panels providing information on the background and goals of the study, describing the
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce"".."""""".."""""..",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,.,.,.,....,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,.., page 7
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
methodology used, the issues likely to be faced within the Kincardine study area and the
Lakeshore study area, and show examples of the mapping that is available. For this first
meeting, we will provide a short presentation and display key methodological issues. We will
then form a discussion group to ask for input.
Depending on the size of the group, we may break into smaller groups to deal with individual
issues and use a wrap-up to engage the entire group at the end. We will ensure that verbal
comments are recorded, but we will request written input as much as possible, using worksheets
and placing input on flip charts to ensure that all participants have equal opportunity for
comment.
Task 4: Implementation of Work Plan and Science Methodology
Compilation of existing digital data from various sources will be a critical part of this project and
will need to be undertaken immediately as the available information will, to a large extent,
inform the types of measures we can utilize for applying various criteria for identification of
Significant Woodlands, Valleylands and Wildlife Habitat. We will suggest options for
addressing information gaps in cases where valid criteria are identified but data are lacking.
However, our approach will ensure that, irrespective of data gaps, the existing information will
be utilized to identify candidate significant areas in a consistent and defensible way.
We suggest that we use a coarser level of analysis for the Kincardine study area than the
Lakeshore study area, mapping the features of the Lakeshore study area separately at a scale of
approximately I :3,000, whereas mapping for the Kincardine study area would be at a scale of
approximately 1 :20,000. These scales allow for a visual analysis of landscape patterns while
acknowledging the need for greater precision in the Lakeshore area.
The following provides a summary of key data layers we would seek as part of this study, with
the source in brackets):
. BASE INFORMATION (County): Study Area Boundary, Roads, County/Municipal
boundaries, cities/towns, etc.
. DESIGNATED NATURAL FEATURES: Hazard Land Areas (County), PSWs
(County/OMNR), Regulated Floodplains (CA), ANSIs (OMNR), Habitat for Threatened &
Endangered Species (County / OMNR), Valleylands (County/CA)
. NATURAL HERITAGE DATA: ELC (possibly available for some areas within the
LakshorelEcodistrict 6E-2 from individual consultants' reports), Wetlands (County, OMNR),
Woodlands (County/CA), Watercourses (County/OMNR), Permanent and intermittent streams
(County/CA), Landforms (using surficial geology mapping)/topography (County/CA/MNR,
NDMN), SAR locations (MNR-NHIC).
GIS tools will be used to assist in the determination of candidate patches consisting of
Significant Woodlands, Valleylands and Significant Wildlife Habitat. Owing to the complexity
of merging a variety of digital data layers, data compilation will require careful thought and
planning. NSE has substantial experience in manipulating large GIS data sets (e.g., recent
Innisfil Natural Heritage System mapping as part of the Official Plan review, York Region
Significant Woodland Study). This task will be undertaken in a manner to ensure there is a high
level of confidence in the quality of the digital shape files and associated attribute files that form
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
the basis of subsequent analyses. We will overlay the available GIS databases from the various
sources on the available digital orthophotography and confirm feature presence/ absence or
boundary changes (at a coarse level) for natural features. Specifically, we will undertake the
following steps.
i) We map features using existing boundaries (for example PSWs, ANSls,).
ii) In consultation with the Science Committee we will establish a definition for woodland that
can be applied using the Woodlands layers provided by the County (derived from OBM);
iii) In our experience, the OBM woodlands layer may have a poor fit with the ortho-imagery, so
boundaries will have to be refined to the extent possible given the scope of the project. We
will establish criteria for boundary reconciliation, (e.g., which GIS database takes precedence
in the event that that there are multiple boundaries: ortho-imagery, OBM woodland, ESA,
etc) and to establish what constitutes a "single patch" where there is a break in forest cover
such as a road, utility corridor, etc. We have completed boundary reconciliation tasks
involving multiple databases in the past (e.g., Halton ESA update) and found it necessary to
establish rules for assigning boundaries to ensure consistency and defensibility. These rules
will also be vetted by the Science Committee.
iv) Merge all of the available GIS databases and determine which portions are applicable for the
reconciliation of an evaluation of Significant Woodlands, Valleylands and Significant
Wildlife Habitat in the context of developing an NHS, as well as any other applicable
landscape criteria patch boundaries. Wooded wetlands (swamps) will be determined by
comparing the OMNR and County wetland layer with the OBM woodland layer.
v) Some vegetation classification may be possible at this stage by comparing satellite polygon
classification to ortho-photos and woodlands layers but it must be emphasized that satellite
imagery is produced at a very coarse scale and we anticipate that we will not be able to
provide a completely accurate classification of many of the woodlands and wetlands.
Therefore, we propose to do further field checking in the Lakeshore area (see Task 4).
vi) Plot hardcopy draft maps showing the merged GIS databases on the orthophotographs at a
suitable scale. We propose the plotting scales be higher where greater resolution is required:
i.e., for the primary pressure area, the Lakeshore designation area in Ecodistrict 6E-2. A
scale of approximately 1 :3000 is likely to provide sufficient resolution for boundary
identification at a finer scale, while still providing an overview oflandscape patterns. We
have found that mapping landscape-scale analyses at a finer scale results in too much detail.
For the rest of the study area, our experience would suggest a scale of 1 :20,000 is probably
the largest scale at which maps can be usefully plotted to provide sufficient resolution;
however, this scale also provides a strong visual impression of landscape patterns. We will
produce one overall poster-sized map for each ofthe coarse and fine study areas, at a scale
reasonable for that type of overview. We will then provide II x 17 maps for discussion and
for inclusion in the final report at the scales discussed.
vii) Using the definition and criteria from steps i) and ii), update/reconcile patch boundaries on
the orthophotographs at the scale proposed for the Lakeshore area and the remainder of the
study area.
Task 5: Determination of Representation
The Oxford landscape criteria used to determine significance include considering representation:
i.e. patches with the largest amount of area (and best condition) on each landform and each soil
type in Bruce. County could be considered significant. If it is determined to be desirable
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................................................................................................................... page 9
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
according to discussions with the Science Committee, we propose to contact MNR for gap
analysis for Ecogions 6E-2 and 6E-5 (the primary Ecoregions in the study area), if these analyses
are available, to determine where there may be under-representation of landform/vegetation
associations. The gap analysis will indicate where these areas are, without the need to classify
vegetation communities. We will explore the use of coarse satellite vegetation analysis data in
conjunction with surficial geology data to determine where there may be opportunities for
representation of currently under-represented landform/vegetation associations. They can be
identified as sites for study in the future.
We propose that vegetation classification be a priority in the Lakeshore study area. In other
areas we suggest that updating or refining vegetation classifications be deferred at this stage, and
that representation be undertaken though a gap analysis. We will only undertake coarse
boundary refinement owing to changes in the extent of features from clearing for development,
agriculture, infrastructure, etc. Thorough documentation of the approach used and consistency in
the application are important here for future defensibility.
Task 6: Consultation
Consultation with Studv Committees
After testing the methodology by running the mapping analyses, we propose a Study Steering
Committee and Science Committee meeting (these could be combined for the sake of efficiency)
to discuss the preliminary NHS that results from the GIS modelling. This mapping, with
refinements proposed by the Steering Committees, will be used as the basis for the first
stakeholder consultation.
We propose that the training session for the County, Municipality and SVCA staff be conducted
at a time determined after this consultation, when the final methods are hammered out after
meetings with the committees.
During this meeting, we will also discuss other deliverables that will be required for the
preliminary report. We will provide a brief summary describing the key components of the
development of guidelines for preparing EIS reports and tree retention plans for committee
review. Our two firms have considerable experience in developing these types of guidelines. In
addition, NSE is currently involved with revising MNRs Natural Heritage Reference Manual,
which supports the implementation ofthe PPS; including revision of the chapter on preparing
EIS statements.
Stakeholder Consultation
Following the clearance of the preliminary mapping with the Science Committee, and the
presentation to the Steering Committee, we will again contact the stakeholder forum described in
Section 5.3 of the RFP. We will present the all findings to date clearly and concisely, including
the mapping, for consideration by the Stakeholder Forum, and ask for stakeholder input. Per the
RFP, we will solicit input from the Stakeholder Forum on two other important issues related to
the NHS:
· the application of the methodology to the remainder of Bruce County;
· preparation ofEIS guidelines;
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IaI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
· the role of, and enhancement of, Natural Heritage Systems within the County of Bruce
and the Municipality of Kincardine.
It is expected that this discussion could focus on recommendations for stewardship that
acknowledge and strengthen the role agricultural practices play in the maintenance of natural
features. However, it will also be important to explore issues such as the impacts of
development within the Lakeshore area on natural features outside the Lakeshore area, as well as
the potential for using legislation or stewardship guidelines to modify agricultural practices to
enhance and restore natural features (for example, developing guidelines for applications of
manure to avoid certain areas, modifying cutting practices within woodlots). We will also follow
up with landowner contact at this stage wherever possible, as we are proposing to field check
boundaries and features in the Lakeshore area at a later stage (Task 6).
Task 7: Preparation of Preliminary Report
As required by the RFP, a preliminary report will present the results of the mapping exercise and
summarize the discussions that have been held to date with members of the Science Committee,
Steering Committee and Stakeholder Forum, including as follows:
· a summary of the analysis completed and preliminary findings based on the objectives
and requirements of the Study;
· draft maps and digital data documenting the results of running the model;
· draft "Environmental Study Guidelines" and "tree retention plan guidelines";
· results of the consultation with the Stakeholder Forum on Natural Heritage Systems.
Task 8: Field Work to Refine Information within the Lakeshore/Ecodistrict 6E-2 Area
We propose to budget for enough time to field-check patches in the Lakeshore area, as we feel
that in order to provide the highest level of confidence in boundaries and classification of
vegetation, and to ensure that features that have been previously described are still present, field
checking is necessary. We propose a reconnaissance of all areas that are designated as part of
the NHS in the preliminary GIS mapping, wherever feasible given the results of landowner
contact. We will particularly review all boundaries (and if possible will review those for which
landowner consent has not been provided from other properties), and all watercourses and other
features that could be used as linkages, as these are generally the subject of intense debate in
Natural Heritage System designation.
We are thoroughly familiar with potential significance of plant communities on the Lake Huron
shoreline, through work in Wasaga Beach and Pinery Provincial Parks, Bruce Peninsula National
Park, and Ipperwash former Armed Forces Base. We will establish a protocol for landowner
contact that will be reviewed by the Study Steering Committee. For each area we are able to
visit, we will conduct the following field work:
· We will classify communities within the Lakeshore area to Ecosite according to southern
Ontario Ecological Land Classification protocols and obtaining lists of representative
plants within each community. Some of these have been classified in EIS documents for
individual development applications. For these we will field-check the accuracy where
possible, but will not re-classify communities unless there are significant discrepancies;
. We will field-check the boundary;
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page II
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
· We will conduct bird and amphibian surveys as much as is feasible in conjunction with
vegetation surveys within these patches according to Canadian Wildlife Service
protocols;
· We will record observations of significant plant and animal species, locating them with a
hand-held GPS receiver.
Task 9: Preparation of Final Study Report
The final report will provide a brief summary of the entire study process. We do not propose to
reiterate the findings that are presented in the preliminary report, but instead to organize the final
report as brief chapters that summarize the preliminary report's findings, while providing any
additional commentary received from the Steering Committee, the Science Committee, and the
Stakeholder Forum. The following additional deliverables will be addressed in the report (all
deliverables are summarized in Section 6):
· The background information on Natural Heritage Resources of the County of Bruce and
specific descriptions of the Municipality of Kincardine,
· the criteria for determining "significance" in the municipality of Kincardine;
· the results of the inventory of the Lakeshore area;
· the final NHS mapping and description of any changes to the methodology that needed to
be implemented as a result of stakeholder input;
Similar to the Discussion Paper produced in Task 3, the Final Study Report will undergo a
review by the Science Committee and Study Steering Committee.
Task 10: Additional Presentations/Costs
As noted in the RFP, we will be prepared to present the study to Kincardine Municipal Council,
Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority Board of Directors and/or County of Bruce Agriculture,
Tourism and Planning Authority, if requested to do so. However, the number of meetings is not
known at this stage. We have provided a cost for this task on a per-meeting basis in the cost
development, but at this stage we have considered it as an out-of-study option and have not
factored it into the total cost. This is the only item we consider as an additional cost for this
proposal.
3.1 Project Schedule
The project schedule is relatively undefined, but it is expected (and stated in the RFP) that it
should move forward as soon as possible after awarding the contract (our timelines assume
award in the first week of March but it is understood that the project may be awarded later than
that). Stakeholder consultation is an important component of this project and meetings and
workshops have been scheduled to provide input at strategic points in the study schedule. Based
on our experience we recognize consultation with stakeholders generally lengthens a project
schedule. Therefore scheduling ofthe meetings and workshops, some with large numbers of
attendees, should be undertaken early on in the project. However, the timeline for the final
stakeholder consultation has deliberately been left with some latitude as people's availability
becomes much more limited during summer holidays and it may be difficult to schedule a
meeting with the full complement of people until the fall.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce.......................,.,.......,...,..........,.,.....................,.,............,............................,... page 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
North-South Environmental Inc_
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Timeline
Project Tasks
Meetings & March April May June July August September
Workshops
15 31 15 30 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 30
Information Review and
Production of Base Maps
Methodological Summary
Implementation of Work
Plan and Methodology
Implementation of Work
Plan and Methodology;
Lakeshore
Preliminary Report X
Reconnaissance Field
Work (primarily
Lakeshore)
Final Report
Science Committee X X
Meetings
Steering Committee X X
Meetings
Stakeholder Forum X X?
Meetings
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Brnce _ _ _ _ uuu_uuuuuuuuuu _ _ u _ _u _ __ _ u _ _ _ _ _ _ _ u _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _....... u.. uu. u. u........ u................ _.......... _... _...... _... uu __ _ u... _....... page 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 COSTS
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
T bilE f t d . t b d t
a e Sima e I proJec UJge
Staff Time (hours) Staff Cost
North-South Dougan & North-South Environmental Dougan & Associates
Tasks Environmental Associates Total
RC Hours SP RC KU MU Totals
BT SM SP KU MU BT SM
110 80 50 60 115 75 110 80 50 60 115 75
Information Review and Production of Base Maps 8 16 8 8 40 $640,00 $800.00 $480.00 $600.00 $2,520.00
Methodological Summary 8 20 8 8 44 $880,00 $1,600.00 $920.00 $600,00 $4,000.00
Implementation of Work Plan and Methodology 12 8 32 60 4 116 $1,320.00 $640.00 $1,600.00 $3,600,00 $460,00 $7,620.00
Implementation of Work Plan and Methodology: Lakeshore 8 8 8 40 4 68 $880.00 $640.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 $460.00 $4,780.00
Preliminary Report 8 32 16 30 12 98 $880.00 $2,560.00 $800.00 $1,800.00 $900.00 $6,940.00
Training Session 12 12 24 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00
Landowner and Stakeholder Contact 16 16 $800.00 $800.00
Reconnaissance Field Work (primarily Lakeshore) 16 40 56 $1,280.00 $2,000.00 $3,280.00
Final Report 12 32 8 52 $1,320.00 $2,560.00 $400.00 $4,280.00
Science Committee Meetings 8 32 12 52 $880.00 $2,560.00 $900.00 $4,340.00
Study Steering Committee Meetings 16 24 40 $1,280.00 $1,200.00 $2,480.00
Stakeholder Forum Meetings/Workshops 16 24 8 20 68 $1,280.00 $1,200.00 $480.00 $1,500.00 $4,460.00
Totals 56 200 184 158 16 60 674 $6,160.00 $16,000.00 $9,200.00 $9,480.00 $1,840.00 $4,500.00 $47,180.00
Note: additional meetings and presentations will be charged at the rate of$1500 per meetmg, plus travel. No other Items descnbed m this proposal will be considered out of scope.
Disbursements
Travel: Meetings and Reconnaissance
Preparation of Materials for Public Consultation
Draft & Final Report and Map Production
Communication
Total Disbursements
Totals
Total Professional Fees
Total Disbursements
Proj ect Cost
GST 5%
Total Project Cost
$2,000,00
$600.00
$800.00
$200.00
$3,600.00
$47,180.00
$3,600.00
$50,780.00
$2,539,00
$53,319.00.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the Connty of Bruce.......,.....,..,.............,...........................,.....,.....,..,..,..,.................,..,..........,.........,.. ,..,..,.....,...................,.....,.....,..,..,.....,................,..,..,.......................,..,...............,..,. ....,.............,.............,...............,..,..,...........................,....... page 15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialisls In Suslainable Landscape Planning
5.0 REFERENCES
North-South Euvironmental
Clieut Organization: Region of Halton
Contact Person: Jason Scott, Environmental Planner, Region of Halton. 1151 Bronte Road
Oakville, ON Canada L6M 3LI Phone: 905-825-6000 x7554
Project Description: Natural Heritage System Options for Sustainable Halton. In the Sustainable
Halton Phase I study North-South Environmental developed goals, objectives and
mapping for three NHS options in the Region of Halton. North-South participated
in team meetings, and consulted with local municipalities and conservation
authorities as part of the Phase I study. Public Open House materials were also
prepared and presented.
Services Provided: Development and application ofNHS criteria for preparation of overlay mapping
on orthoimagery and preparation and attendance for stakeholder consultation
Project Dates: 2006 - 2007
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
Services Provided:
Project Dates:
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
Services Provided:
Project Dates:
Town of Richmond Hill
David Collinson, Director of Planning, Town of Richmond Hill; P.O. Box 300
Richmond Hill, ON L4C 4Y5 Phone: (905) 771-8910
North Leslie OMB Hearing. This project included a peer review of Master
Environmental Servicing Plans (MESPs), Environmental Impact Assessments and
a proposed Secondary Plan for a development block adjacent to, and partially
overlapping with the Oak Ridges Moraine in Richmond Hill. As part of
developing the Town's position at an OMB hearing, NSE prepared a Natural
Heritage System that incorporated the many natural heritage features in
functionally connected system. Of note was the emphasis placed on a landscape
level approach that recognized the role of the study area in linking the Oak Ridges
Moraine with Lake Ontario, via the Rouge River Corridor. The assignment
included preparation of evidence for presentation at an Ontario Municipal Board
hearing. The NHS was accepted in its entirety by the Board.
Development of natural heritage system, mapping, and preparation of
evidence for OMB hearing
2002-2004
City of Mississauga
Eva Kliwer, City of Mississauga Planning and Building Department, 300 City
Centre Drive, Mississauga, ON L5B 3CI Phone: 905-896-5753
Mississauga Natural areas Update. North-South staff were retained in 10
consecutive years to update the City's Natural Areas database which we originally
developed in 1996. The updates include a review of current aerial photographs
with those from 1996 to detect natural area boundary infringements and new
adjacent development, as well as a review of recent EIS documents associated
with recent approved development applications. Sites with potential changes were
field visited to document impacts and update natural feature inventory. New data
were entered into the Natural Areas database and natural area boundaries were
refined.
Breeding bird survey, three season botanical inventory, condition assessment,
boundary review, database update and mapping
1997 to 2007
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce...,.,.,..........,................,...,............,.,.....,.,................,.,.,.,......,..........,.,............,. page 17
North-South Environmental I nc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
Services Provided:
Project Dates:
Dougan & Associates
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
Project Dates:
Services Provided:
Project Value:
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
Services Provided:
Project Dates:
Client Organization:
Contact Person:
Project Description:
City of Toronto
Jane Weninger, Senior Planner, City of Toronto, 18th Floor, West Tower, City
Hall, Toronto, Ontario. M5H 2N2
Review. of Environmentally Significant Areas in the former City of Toronto,
Review of Provincially Significant Wetlands in the City of Toronto. This
project provided a comprehensive review of existing ESAs within the former City
and a review of criteria used for the designation of ESAs within the O.P.
Collaboration with TRCA developed interpretation guidelines of practical use in
applying the criteria. We obtained field information collected in 2006 as part ofa
separate project from D&A (as well as participating in the field work), and
developed fact sheets detailing the criteria for which each area was designated.
Ecological assessment of evaluation criteria, field terrestrial and condition
assessment, ESA boundary review and mapping
2005 to 2007
City of Brampton
David Waters, Planner, City of Brampton, T. (905) 274-2074
Mount Pleasant Subwatershed Study & Landscape Scale Analyses. D&A has
played both a sub-consultant and lead role in the ongoing environmental planning
for northwest Brampton for the past 6 years. Recent work has involved an analysis
of environmental features, functions and linkages for the northwest lands based on
an ecosystem approach to protection. The firm has also conducted comprehensive
terrestrial field studies in support of these analyses including ELC, amphibian
surveys, breeding bird surveys and botanical studies.
Sept. 2006 - ongoing
Natural heritage planning, ecological assessment, GIS-based landscape-scale
analyses, consultations with City staff, CVC, key stakeholders and the public
Approximately $100,000
City of Guelph
Carrie Musselman, Environmental Planner, Community Design and Development
Services, City of Guelph, 2 Wyndham St. N., 3rd Floor, Guelph ON, N1H 3AI, T:
(519) 837-5616 x 2356
City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy, Phases 1 & 2. Worked with the City
and Technical Committee to develop criteria for Locally Significant Natural areas
with some input from stakeholders and the public. Developed a natural heritage
database and populated it with all existing background data, then added data from
current assessments (2005 - 2006), and used this data to apply the LSNA criteria
(using GIS) and make recommendations for designation.
Natural heritage planning, public consultation, terrestrial assessments, database
development, GIS analyses & mapping.
Feb. 2004 - Mar. 2005 (Ph I), Mar. 2005 - Nov. 2007 (Ph 2)
Region of Waterioo
Christopher Gosselin, Manager of Environmental Planning,
Planning, Housing, and Community Services Department, Regional Municipality
of Waterloo, 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, ON, N2G 4J3, T. (519) 575-4501
Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes (ESL) Study Paper & OMB. Provided
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the Couuty of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmentallnc,
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Project Duration:
Services Provided:
a literature of current landscape ecology approaches, a critique of proposed ESL
criteria, and applied the revised criteria to 2 candidate ESLs in the Region of
Waterloo (using GIS) using desktop resources. D&A was recently called on to
explain and defend their approach before the OMB for one of the ESLs.
3 years
Ecological research (secondary), natural heritage planning, GIS analysis, expert
witness testimony.
Sept. 2004 - Sept. 2005 (Paper), July - Sept. 2007 (OMB)
Project Dates:
6.0 STUDY TEAM
North-South Environmental Inc. is the lead consultant for this study and will be the main point of
contact. In order to provide the evaluation team with a complete understanding of the study
team's experience the information provided below includes sections for both North-South
Environmental Inc. and Dougan & Associates where appropriate,
6.1 Profile and Experience
Company Name:
Contact Person and Title:
Address:
North-South Environmental Inc.
Mirek Sharp, President.
35 Crawford Crescent, Unit 5
P.O. Box 518,
Campbellville, ON
LOP lEO
905-854-1112 (phone); 905-854-0001 (fax)
msharp@nsenvironmental.com
Telephone/Fax:
Email Address:
Vendor History:
North-South was incorporated in March 1999, it has two principals,
Mirek Sharp - President and Dr. Brent Tegler - Secretary Treasurer.
Brief Overview:
North-South Environmental Inc. (NSE) is an environmental
consulting firm with collective expertise that combines over 90 years
of experience in the earth and life sciences.
NSE is highly respected for consulting
services founded on sound scientific ability
with strong analytical skills, supported by
contemporary tools such as spatial analysis
(GIS) and remote sensing. NSE specializes
in the description and interpretation of
ecological features and processes for
environmental impact and management
design studies for sustainable resource
utilization and protection in a wide range of
temperate, tropical and arctic ecosystems.
Karst Spring - Niagara Escarpment, Burlington, Ont
Photo Credit: Mirek Sharp
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce,.,.,."".,."".....,.,...,..""""........,.,.....,.",.,......."""".....""...""...,.,.,.,..........,.,.."page 19
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Pfanning
At the heart of our approach is recognition of the growing need to restore and manage
sustainable landscapes, whether they are in an urban, rural, or wilderness setting. Our belief is
that sustainability is irreversibly connected to ecological process and function. The degree to
which these can be maintained or restored is the degree to which sustainability will be achieved.
This is as true of a small urban park as it is of a large wilderness area.
Grassy Waterway Candidate Protected Area Evaluation,
Gozama. Ontario Photo Credit: Chris Manderson
6.1.1 List of Sub-Consultants
Company Name:
Contact Person and Title:
Address:
Our approach recognizes the need for an
appropriate balance between human needs
and ecological sustainability. This
balance will vary with the ecological
setting and long term human
requirements.
NSE is one of the few environmental
firms which offer clients a true ecosystem
approach, with full integration between
the physical and biological sciences. Our
senior professionals have a long history of
working together to undertake analyses
and develop concepts on proj ects
involving a consideration oflandform,
soils, vegetation and wildlife.
Dougan & Associates
Jim Dougan
77 Wyndham St. South,
Guelph, ON
NIB 5R3
519.822.1609 (phone); 519.822.5389 (fax)
idougan@dougan.ca
D&A was established in 1981 and was incorporated in 1991. It is a
sole proprietorship under the direction of Jim Dougan, Principal.
Telephone/Fax:
Email Address:
Vendor History:
Brief Overview:
Dougan & Associates - Ecological Consulting & Design (D&A) is an
independent consulting firm based in Guelph, Ontario that has
conducted more than 1000 projects for the public and private and
currently has 15 permanent employees. D&A specializes in terrestrial
ecology and offers the following core services: Natural Heritage
Planning, Landscape Design, Ecological Assessment & Management,
Environmental Impact Assessment, Ecological Restoration & Habitat
Creation, Urban Forest Management, Ecological Monitoring &
Education, Peer Review & Expert Witness Testimony. D&A
regularly provides technical support for southern Ontario
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmentallnc,
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
municipalities on natural heritage issues, but also has many private
sector-clients and does some work for government and conservation
agencies.
6.1.2 Staff Roles and Experience
Role: - Project Manager - Brent Tegler Ph.D. (North-South Environmental) - Brent will
provide advice and review for this project, particularly on development of methodology, Brent is
an applied ecologist specializing in the description and interpretation of ecological features and
processes in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Dr. Tegler has completed field inventories,
environmental impact analysis, and environmental management design studies for sustainable
resource utilization and protection in a wide range of environments including, tropical, temperate
and arctic ecosystems. Dr. Tegler has demonstrated abilities in applied research, project
management and formal and non-formal training as result of positions held within universities,
government, and environmental consulting firms. Dr. Tegler has completed field studies on the
impact of logging, fire and increased agricultural pressures in Bangladesh, Solomon Islands,
Mali, Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone. In North America he has participated in the
development of environmental monitoring programs for the U.S. Forest Service, the Ecological
Monitoring and Assessment Network of Environment Canada and Ontario Parks.
Role: Project advisor - Ken Ursie M.Sc. (Dougan and Associates)
Ken will provide advice to this project, particularly in development of methodologies. Ken has
been an Ecologist with D&A since 1995 and has extensive knowledge and expertise in the field
of applied terrestrial ecology, He has participated in over 200 environmental projects for the
private and public sectors in Ontario, and provides special expertise in natural heritage systems
planning, impact assessment and management strategies for small and large-scale proj ects, Ken
is well versed in relevant policies, current practices, and progressive strategies pertaining to
natural heritage features in southern Ontario.
Role: Study Team Leader - Sarah Mainguy M.Sc. (North-South Environmental) - Sarah will
provide the lead role in writing reports, project supervision, as well as participating in developing
and summarizing methodologies for determining significance. Sarah has a comprehensive
knowledge of the flora and fauna of Ontario, She has conducted and managed a diversity of
projects, both in small remnant ecosystems in urban and agricultural areas and in broad
wilderness landscapes. Her experience encompasses the tradeoffs between remediation of
human impacts and protection of Species at Risk. She has conducted both botanical and wildlife
inventories to develop management plans for natural heritage features to improve habitat
management in agricultural areas, She has also applied her knowledge of natural heritage to
provide a basis for environmentally sensitive developments, and to provide input to municipal
environmental planning initiatives, as well as park planning in wilderness areas. She has
provided expert witness testimony at a court case involving wildlife and vegetation inventories at
a contaminated mine site in Deloro, Ontario, and provided evidence to the Ontario Municipal
Board,
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce",.,.""".",.""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,""'.,."""".""""."""".,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,.,.page 21
North-South Environmental Inc.
SpeciaNsts in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Role: Technical Assistant - Sarah Piett B'sc. (North-South Environmental) - Sarah will assist
in all aspects of the project Sarah is a field biologist with an excellent understanding of plant
community relationships through her knowledge of the flora of Ontario and the application of
ELC plant community classification for numerous environmental projects.
Sarah has worked to describe vegetation communities and identify plants throughout southern
Ontario. She has been trained by the Ministry of Natural Resources to complete Ecological Land
Classifications and has completed the Provincial Wetland Evaluation course. Her experience
includes extensive field investigations to produce floral and faunal inventories for natural areas.
Sarah has also investigated plant species of special concern. In addition, she has also
participated in bird surveys such as breeding bird, raptor, and fall migration surveys.
She has also prepared and implemented management plans for a variety of projects. Such work
included surveying natural areas and determining the conservation goals, targets, and threats for
the property. Subsequently, recommendations for the proper management and stewardship ofthe
land were made. In addition, various habitat rehabilitation methods were suggested and
implemented to reach the conservation goals identified in the management plan.
Role: Public Facilitation Team Leader - Margot Ursic M.Sc. (Dougan and Associates) -
Margot will coordinate and facilitate the stakeholder consultations, and provide input to the
criteria development and discussion papers.
Margot completed her M.Sc. in Botany in 1996, has been a permanent staff member with D&A
since 1998, and has more than 10 years of experience conducting ecological literature reviews,
compiling ecological reports, and developing and presenting educational materials on ecological
topics. She also has more than 8 years of experience in assessment of natural heritage policies
and practices in southern Ontario, having worked with several municipal clients on criteria-based
approaches for identification of environmentally significant areas, as well as more than 5 years
of experience conducting a wide range of stakeholder and public consultations for municipal
clients.
Over the past 5 years, she has coordinated and conducted consultations for the following
on behalf of municipal clients (see examples provided in Appendix):
New Tecurnseth Urban Forest Strategy Focus Group Session
. Essex County Wind Turbine Policy Development Workshop
Huron Natural Area Public Meetings (2) and Stakeholder Workshop (Kitchener)
. City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy Stakeholder Workshop & Community
Meeting
. Best Practices for Terrestrial Assessments for City of Hamilton Planning Staff
. Town of Markham Private Tree By-law Public Meetings
. Town of Oakville's Environmental Strategic Plan
. Creditview Wetland Management Plan Public Meeting
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Over the past 5 years, she has also coordinated and conducted research for the following
large-scale natural heritage planning projects:
. City of Toronto ESA, ANSI and Migratory Bird Study (in progress)
. Region of Waterloo Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes Study & OMB Support
. City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy
. Strategic Urban Forest Management Plan for the City of Guelph
. Town of Fort Erie Natural Areas Inventory
Role: GIS Applications - Richard Czok B.Sc. (North-South Environmental) - Richard will
provide mapping and GIS expertise throughout the project. Richard has extensive experience in
all aspects of GIS applications having worked NSE projects throughout the province of Ontario.
These projects have involved the use of very large composite orthoimage libraries, development
and application of spatial analysis algorithms, linked attribute database libraries, and the
production of large scale, high quality final mapping products.
6.1.3 Value Added Services
. NSE and D&A both have extensive in-house libraries of scientific journals (+4000
papers), books, technical papers and reports related to landscape ecology and
conservation biology that we access, as required, for natural heritage planning projects.
. D&A has additional administrative staff available to assist with coordination of meetings
if required
. NSE and D&A can generate colour mapping and public presentation products of various
sizes (8.5" x 11", II" x 17", and any length up to 36" wide) from in-house copier and
plotting machines for use at meetings (team as well as public) and workshops.
6.1.4 Additional Information on Representative Projects
NSE has undertaken numerous projects related to the evaluation of ecological features and
functions in Ontario. Typically these projects involve an evaluation of significance of ecological
features and functions observed, which in many cases involves the development of appropriate
criteria to assess significance or at other times an understanding of existing criteria and the
correct method for their application. A sample list of some of the many projects demonstrating
NSE's abilities in the area of natural area evaluation to determine significance include:
Durable Halton Plan Natural Heritage System Options - ongoing
This study is a major and guiding component of a planning initiative undertaken by the Region
of Halton to guide growth through to 2030. The DHP will form the basis of Halton's response to
the provincial growth plan and upcoming Official Plan review. NSE staff developed three
options for a regional NHS which built on existing protection designations in the OP. It focused
on developing and refining linkages among the region's natural features, and building substantial
core areas, especially on the Peel Plain, in order to maintain biological diversity and ecological
function in the long term. The options all recognized a basic framework composed of the
Niagara Escarpment, which links the Region in the larger landscape, and the other established
linkages associated with the major watercourses.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce...................,.,.,.,.,.,.....,.........................,. ,......,.,............................................... page 23
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
North Pickering Development Project 2005
North-South Environmental Inc. participated on a multi-disciplinary team to develop land use
alternatives in North Pickering for the MMAH (as part ofthe exchange for the ORM lands in
Richmond Hill). Our involvement included refinement and implementation of a Natural
Heritage System (NHS) developed in concert with the Ministry of Natural Resources and
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. The goal of the Development Plan for North
Pickering is to integrate and protect a viable NHS while creating a community that meets smart
growth principals of healthy, distinctive and attractive communities, with affordable housing and
easy access to employment, health care, education, and community services. The NHS is
intended to protect key ecological features and functions and sustain a viable, permanent eco-
system. All parts of the NHS are connected with each other, and the system as-a-whole provides
the integrity and resiliency necessary to coexist with an expanding and adjacent urban
community and a thriving agricultural community.
Alder/Strasburg Creek Natural Heritage System and Environmental Impact Study 2003-
2004
Summary: The purpose of this study was to protect biodiversity through design of a natural
heritage system in the agricultural Alder Creek and urbanizing Strasburg Creek watersheds, with
particular consideration of the potential and actual effects of agricultural practices, aggregate'
extraction and nearby urbanization. The other important objective of the study was to investigate
opportunities to rehabilitate and enhance linkages for natural heritage features. The natural
heritage system was based on the incorporation of core and satellite features such as wetlands
and forests, and the connecting links between them in this relatively permeable agricultural
landscape. Actual and potential impacts to the natural features within the watersheds were
identified within the context of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Study.
Recommendations for mitigation involved developing stewardship opportunities in the
agricultural landscape to address problems such as local contamination of wetlands from biosolid
applications and cutting practices that reduced diversity in forest blocks. Recommendations in
urbanizing areas and in the vicinity of aggregate extraction involved the implementation of
buffers and linkages to maintain biodiversity within the changing landscape.
Richmond Hill Corridor Study. 1998
Summary: NSE staff headed a study team on this project to identify viable natural corridors
within the non-urbanized section ofthe Town of Richmond Hill. The study area was located on
the Oak Ridges Moraine, and emphasis was placed on identifying ecologically functional
connections that maintained the continuity of the moraine. Goals and objectives developed in
concert with a steering committee were used to develop selection criteria for core areas and
corridor types. Four types of corridors were recognized that responded to the functional
attributes of the local biota and, if implemented, would continue to support the ecological
function of the remnant natural features present. An analysis of the impact of the proposed
corridor system on transportation routes was undertaken and approaches to incorporating the
corridor system into the Official Plan were provided. Lastly, management recommendations to
enhance long term viability of the corridors were provided.
Key Staff: Mirek Sharp (manager), Mary Ann Johnson, Rob Delorme, Chris Henschel, and
Richard Czok
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
Rouge Duffins Natural Heritage System. 1996.
Summary: This project used a landscape approach to ecosystem protection to ensure that natural
ecological processes and functions of natural systems are maintained or enhanced through the
development of a core and corridor system in the study area. The stages of the project included:
I) setting goals and objectives; 2) assembling existing information to produce GIS-based
mapping of natural features for analysis; and 3) delineating a natural heritage system that
balances protection needs with other land uses.
Key Staff: Mirek Sharp (manager), Brent Tegler, Mary Ann Johnson, Rob Delorme
Georgian Bay Islands Greater Park Ecosystem Study. 1994-1998.
Parks Canada has a mandate to preserve areas representative of the Canadian landscape and yet it
is recognized that smaller parks such as Georgian Bay Islands National Park are not large enough
to sustain populations of all the biota that occur there. As a first step of going beyond an isolated
park-centric view of ecosystem protection and towards achieving bioregional conservation,
Geomatics organized a seminar on conservation plarming at a bioregional scale. This seminar
resulted in the establishment of a multi-jurisdictional working group for the Georgian Bay
region. In the second phase, existing areas of conservation interest were mapped and
ecologically linked to produce a "vision map". The "vision map" illustrates a potential network
of cores and corridors to protect long term viability of the regional biota. Refinement of the
vision map was undertaken in smaller "pilot" area centred on Georgian Bay Island National Park
to refine the location and size of specific linkages to accommodate the regional fauna.
Gap Analysis and Candidate Area Selection for Life Science Representation in Site District
4E-3. 1994.
This project applied a method developed earlier by Geomatics that used enduring features
(landforms) as a basis for defining the full range of environmental gradients that define the
diversity of a given area. This was used as a basis for recommending areas for life science
representation. The method employed significant spatial analyses using ArcInfo Geographic
Information System. An in-depth literature review was undertaken to explore various minimum
size criteria required to achieve long term integrity. This included minimum viable population
analysis (PV A), disturbance theory, the role of wildlife corridors and life histories of key species
to define minimum home ranges for breeding. The role of old growth forest in the landscape was
also investigated. The final recommendations identified 15 interconnected core areas that
provided for the long term representation of life science features in the District.
Oak Ridges Moraine Natural Heritage Study. 1992-1993.
Client: Greater Toronto Area Planning Office, OMNR, Maple
Contact: Fred Johnson, Manager Special Projects (905) 832-7190
Summary: Geomatics International Inc. was retained to develop an ecological framework
(Natural Heritage System) incorporating a detailed GIS database (1: 1 0 000 scale) and provide
the basis for long-term planning and cumulative effects monitoring on the GT A and Ganaraska
portions of the Oak Ridges moraine. The database is composed of ecological coverages including
forests, wetlands, ESAs, ANSIs, steep slopes, river corridors, soil texture and moisture,
topography, etc. A total of 11 specific criteria, developed based on ecological principles, formed
the basis of selecting natural core areas and inter-connecting corridors for long-term protection
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 25
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
on the moraine. The criteria were defined within an overall goal of maintaining and enhancing
the ecological integrity of the Oak Ridges Moraine.
Natural Environment Systems Strategy for the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton.
1993-1995.
Client: Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton
Contact: David Miller, Environmental Planner, Planning Department, Region of Ottawa-Carleton
(613) 560-6058 (ext. 1447)
Summary: Geomatics International Inc. completed the development of a Natural Environment
Systems Strategy to be incorporated into the Official Plan revisions by the Regional Municipality
of Ottawa-Carleton. Phase 1 consisted of the development of a detailed digital data base
(1: I 0 000) incorporating physical, biological, hydrological and hydrogeological information. As
part of phase 1, Geomatics prepared an ecosystem-function based classification of vegetation and
wetland types which were mapped using MNR Forest Resource Inventory information and recent
(1993) large scale aerial photos. The photos were also utilized to map aquatic habitats. The
vegetation information was combined with landform/soil data to develop unique ecologically
based polygons (Landscape Analysis). These polygons form the basis for developing a system of
Potential Natural Cores and Linkages (Phase 2).
Natural Areas of New Brunswick. 1994-1995.
Client: Ecological Reserves Branch, Department of Environment and Energy, Fredericton, NB
Contact: Ms. Martha Gorman, (506) 453-2383
Summary: Geomatics International worked in an advisory capacity to the New Brunswick
Department of Natural Resources and Energy. The Ecological Reserves Program is developing a
protected areas network for the Province utilizing the representivity and ecological integrity
criteria developed by Geomatics International. Geomatics' role included reviewing New
Brunswick's existing digital information base and other information available on natural areas
and directing the use of this information for application of Geomatic's CCEA methodology to
develop a system of natural cores with interconnecting links on a province-wide basis. The final
areas were defined to maximize biodiversity, to be representative of the province's Ecoregions
and to account for ecological integrity. Geomatics International also developed an
implementation strategy to allow for long-term protection offorested areas within a jurisdiction
which has traditionally heavily utilized its forest resources.
Ecosystem Conservation Plan for Pukaskwa National Park and Greater Park Ecosystem
Workshops with regional stakeholders in the Boreal Forest and Lake Superior Basin were
facilitated to prepare the Ecosystem Conservation Plan for Pukaskwa National Park. The
framework developed included goals, objectives and tasks to operationalize ecosystem-based
management at three hierarchical levels: the Park, Greater Park Ecosystem (portion of L.
Superior Basin) and Greater Ecosystem (entire basin and boreal forest). A suite of indicators of
ecological integrity (integrity measures, target values, tolerance limits) was established for each
level to be monitored to evaluate ecosystem sustainability. Partnership opportunities with
stakeholders and the potential role ofthe public were identified.
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
St. Clair Natural Heritage System. 1997.
In 1997 Geomatics was awarded a contract to provide 3 reports in aid of the St. Clair Remedial
Action Plan (RAP) process: the Stage 1 Update 1997, the Stage 2 Implementation Annex 1997,
and a document that provides a framework for the development of a Natural Heritage System for
the entire St. Clair River watershed. Geomatics developed a framework for a landscape-level
analysis of the St. Clair River watershed and formulated a conservation plan, with associated
GIS-based information support system. This framework is intended as a guide to assist each
implementing agency (municipalities, stewardship groups, provincial/state govermnents, etc.) in
future environmental protection, rehabilitation, and restorative initiatives. The intention is that
the implementation of a watershed-wide Natural Heritage System will contribute to overall
remediation efforts and the eventual de-listing of the St. Clair River as an Area of Concern.
7.0 DELIVERABLES
Staff time is requested from the partners at stakeholder and committee meetings, as previously
described in the proposal (refer to Section 2.4 - Consultation).
As defined in the RFP the deliverables for this study include sufficient copies of the preliminary
report for the use ofreviewing committees, finalized (after comment) into a stand-alone report,
and 10 copies of the final report in hard copy and electronic format. These reports will include:
· General description of the Natural Heritage resources of the County of Bruce and a
specific description for the Municipality of Kincardine (preliminary report, summarized
in final report);
. Criteria for determining significance in the Municipality of Kincardine based on
landscape ecology concepts (preliminary report, snmmarized in final report);
· Digital model in Arcview implementing the criteria resulting in a map showing the
location and number of criteria met of significant patches within the Study area (shown at
a scale of approximately I :20,000 for the Kincardine study area, and approximately
I :3000 for the Lakeshore study area).
. Digital data and an accompanying data dictionary, per the RFP;
. Digital map indicating "Areas of Potential Development" and Areas of No Development"
within the study area, with emphasis on the Lakeshore/Ecodistrict 6E-2 area;
. Compilation of vegetation and feature descriptions, discussions of significant features,
species lists and any other results from inventories of the Lakeshore area (in the final
report) ;
. Discussion paper on implementation options for the ongoing protection and enhancement
of the NHS (appendix in final report);
. Background information for Official Plan policies (appendix in final report);
· Draft "Environmental Impact Study Guideline" to describe the process and general
methodology for completion of an EIS (appendix in preliminary report, snmmarized in
final report);
. Recommendations on acceptable content and standards for a "tree retention plan
guideline" document to be used in association with development proposals (appendix in
preliminary report, summarized in final report);
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 27
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
· Brief report providing recommendations for extending the methodology completed for
the Municipality of Kincardine to the remainder of Bruce County, (as a chapter in the
final report, including the comments of the Stakeholder forum);
· A brief report outlining the overall study including a summary of Study Steering
Committee, Science Committee and Stakeholder Forum Meetings (final report).
8.0 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST STATEMENT
No team members have any conflicts of interest.
APPENDICES INCLUDED
· Appendix G - Proof of Registration
· Representative Public Consultation Materials
· Curriculum Vitae for North-South Environmental Inc.
· Curriculum Vitae for Dougan & Associates
Kincardine NHS Study Proposal
Prepared for the County of Bruce........................................................................................................................ page 28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Proof of Registration
Name of Contractor:
NDil,-n4- .5uvJ+] t;NVlI2.0NMa14Tt:r-L- INt. .
j rfBwi /crrorp
Tender/Quote: ~1NLA-P-OiN:E:. NMvMt..-- ~-g-(lITl'r'\~ ~fiT~m ~)lJ Dr (If s ~, >1 J ",,)
I agree that upon request, I will provide proof of registration with the
Workplace Safety Insurance Board (WSIB) and that I agree to comply with
the Retail Sales Tax requirements.
Date:
1
Municipality of Kincardine Natural Heritage System Study- Terrestrial
Terms of Reference - December 13, 2007
Appendix 'G'- Page 2 of2
1
1
I.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~,.......""'...""
. ..
. ..
.. ..
Ii'''''';
I~ -
; ~ ;1
WELCOME TO
THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH'S
FOCUS GROUP SESSION
December 4, 2007
6:15 - 9:00 pm
Visioning for an
Urban Forest
Management Strategy
for New Tecumseth
Please pick up an agenda & sign in
1//
~/.p'~."'.. ~.
~ ..~h.-_
ok'
~
~
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.
Background
The Town of New Tecumseth is exploring opportunities to
improve its urban forest resources - or the 'green infrastructure' -
of the Town, and is seeking community input.
URBAN FORESTRY INITIATIVES UNDERTAKEN TO DATE
Over 2006 and 2007 the following have been undertaken:
.
Completion of an independent Priority Risk Assessment of
town trees leading to recommendations for removals and
maintenance of apparent 'risk trees'.
.
Preparation of an Urban Forest Management Outline to
suggest options for future management.
.
Collection of preliminary data and mapping for an inventory of
the trees in Alliston, Beeton and Tottenham, as well as
trimming or removal of priority risk trees.
OBJECTIVES OF THIS FOCUS GROUP SESSION
To engage participants in the future care and management of the
trees that make up the urban forests of New Tecumseth.
To gather input to a long-term urban forestry strategy for the
Town through the creation of a vision statement and some
strategic priorities.
(~
Town of New TecLJtnsclh
will) Flssistaflce from
Urhan Forest Innovations Inc.
OQuqan & Associates - ECDlogical Consultin!j & Design
Capital G Consulting Inr..
r EOCUS GROUP SESSION
Urban Forest Management
Strategy for New Tecumseth
December 4, 2007
I~
I
-
-
~
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Services Trees Provide
The urban forest provides a wide range of
environmental, economic and social
services (as documented in scientific and
technical journals). In general, the bigger
the tree, the more benefits it provides.
I
nt
fa " :,'
~__.!lj? c
=
~._,
ENVIRONMENTAL
. Trees improve air aualitv by producing oxygen,
absorbing pollutants and sequestering carbon.
. Trees improve water aualitv by filtering some
pollutants and contributing to erosion control.
. Urban forests cool watercourses and mitiaate noise and dust
. Trees provide habitat and food sources for wildlife such as
birds, insects, and small mammals.
.~
SOCIAL
. Trees provide direct mental health benefits and have also
been shown to reduce crime in urban areas.
~
ECONOMIC
. Trees can reduce enerav consumption in
buildings by providing cooling, windbreak and
shading functions.
. Trees provide storm water manaaement through moderation of
peak flows, maintenance of base flow and rainfall interception.
. Urban forests create an appealina consumer environment. ,I )
. Trees, and natural areas, are known to increase property v~:~
~
'U"'
TOVIII uf New TeCulllseth
witl) ilssistanr;e from
Urban Forest Innovations Inc.
Dougan & Assoclutes - Ecologic<J1 Consulting & Design
C<.:lpital G Consultinq Inc.
r FOCUS GROUP SESSION I
Urban Forest Management
Strategy for New Tecumseth
.. December 4, 2007
I
I (What is a Strategic
Urban Forest
Management Plan
(SUFMP)?
I
I
I
I
I .~
-
.
~
"'
c
.~
I ~
.
~
...
c
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
A SUFMP is a plan to ensure the proper management and long-
term health of a community's trees in an effective way.
Stl1dl'~ic Mmmgl'lIlcnt Plan
20 year Strategic Plan
5-ycar
Management
PIau
5-Ye'ar
Mcumgcmellt
Ph'lll
AOP= Allllu..1 Opcrnting Plan
FIGURE 1. SUFMP strucluro (source: [);-, A. Kenney)
~\, "\~." L', hoo '0"" t,ton'j..",.rt p,."
1\
I \ FIGURE 2. SUFMP oompo,,",,',. Compo",,," ,"" "p"Oh'"..,h
~ (la~hplanare8hlldad(source:A, Bilfdelqlan-AmocOSlI)
U
I
I
I
KEY ELEMENTS OF A
SUFMP
1. A 20-year strategy
with four 5-year
management plans and
twenty Annual
Operating Plans nested
within it.
2. Continual integration
of new information and
changing
circumstances (i.e.,
adaptive management).
3. Based on the
cornerstones of a tree
inventory, ongoing
education, and
proactive management
(e.g., pruning, plant
health care, planting
before tree removals).
/J
- --------
Town of NeVI TeClltl1seth
Witl1 assistance from
Urban Forest InnovAtions Inc.
DOlJ~Jan & Associates - EGoloyical Consulting & Design
Cilpiti'll G Consulting Inc.
FOCUS GROUP SESSION
Urban Forest Management
Stralegy for New Tecumscth
December 4, 2007
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Strategies for
Keeping an Urban
Forest Healthy
and Safe
KNOW YOUR RESOURCE: INVENTORY
. The more accurate and comprehensive an area's
tree inventory is, the easier it is to manage that
resource and plan for future needs.
. Current technologies (such as GPS and GIS
mapping) can facilitate this process.
TREE PRESERVATION
. It is almost always more cost effective to
preserve established mature trees than replace
them with newly planted trees.
. Mature trees should be recognized as valuable
amenities that take decades to replace.
PLANT HEALTH CARE
. Invasive insects are a real threat to Ontario's
urban forests. Strategies include
maintaining a high diversity of tree species,
targeted use of pesticides, and replanting
with species thought to be less susceptible
to pest infestations.
PRO-ACTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT
. Ongoing identification and care of hazard or risk trees,
especially on public lands, is increasingly being recognized
as part of a responsible municipal urban forest strategy.
ONGOING OUTREACH & EDUCATION
. The majority of southern Ontario's trees are on private lands
so private landowners have a key role to play.
~ll ' '
~I"
~
,tJ'
Town of NevI TeclIIl1seth
Wftfl assistance (/'Om
Urban Forest Innov<:Jtions lilt:.
Dou~lml & Associ~tes - Ecological Consulting & Design
Capital G Consulting Inc.
FOCUS GROUP SESSION
Urban Forest Management
Strategy for New Tecumseth
December 4, 2007
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
BRENT TEGLER, B.Sc. M.Sc. Ph.D.
PERSONAL DATA
Citizenship: Canadian
Languages: English, Melanasian Pidgin, West African Krio
Birthdate: 14 April 1954
EDUCATION
Ph.D. University of Guelph (1993), Doctor of Philosophy, Ecology
M.Sc McMaster University (1980), Master of Science, Ecophysiology
B.Sc University of Toronto (1977), Bachelor of Science, Hon. Ecology
APPOINTMENTS
Special Graduate Faculty
University of Guelph, School of Environmental Design and
Rural Development
CAREER SUMMARY
North-South Environmental Inc. (1999 to present), Applied Ecologist & Principal
Partner in a company that addresses the varied needs of sustainable landscape planning related to
wildlands, sustainable forestry, agriculture lands and urban lands. North-South Environmental
Inc. emphasizes the development of environmental management designs that meet human needs
within landscapes that maximize the ecological integrity of self-sustaining natural systems with
high native species diversity.
Geomatics International Inc. (1991 to 1999), Applied Ecologist
Applied terrestrial ecologist specialising in the description and interpretation of biological
features and processes in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Duties include report writing,
project management, field work and data analysis. Project areas include sustainable forest
management, environmental impact assessment, protected areas selection and design, cumulative
effects monitoring, rare plant monitoring, environmental restoration, fire management and non-
formal education.
Western Province Government, Solomon Islands (1993 to 1995), Environment Officer
Environmental Advisor to the government and people of Western Province to assist with the
development of resource management policies, impact studies, legislation and environmental
education programs.
University of Guelph (1987-1991), Ph.D. graduate student
Ph.D. student in the Departments of Environmental Biology and Geography at the University of
Guelph. Thesis topic: Vegetative control of wind erosion in the Sahel Region of West Africa.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1986-1987), Research Plant Ecologist
Researcher and author of a report on the role of fire in the ecology of the vegetation of Pinery
Provincial Park leading to the preparation of a five year prescribed burn plan for the restoration
of Oak Savanna in the Park.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmentallnc,
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
BRENT TEGlER, B.Se. M.Sc. Ph.D.
Papua New Guinea Forestry College (1983-1985), Head of Botany Department
Administrator of Botany Department, including staff, arboretum, herbarium and research.
Supervised and taught ecology, dendrology, introductory botany, soils and geology, and wildlife
biology, Conducted ecology field trips in wilderness environments with college students.
University of Sierra Leone, Africa (1981-1983), Ecology Lecturer
Responsible for lecturing and curriculum development of courses in Introductory and Advanced
Ecology and field courses in the Ecology of Savanna Woodland.
World Wildlife Fund-US (1982-83), Research Botanist
Field research and report prepared on the vegetation of Kilimi National Park, Sierra Leone,
INTERNATIONAL FIELD EXPERIENCE
Senegal training staff from Senegalese non-government organizations in the use of
GeoNetWeaver NRM analysis software to assess and monitor ongoing development projects in
Community Based Natural Resource Management.
Nigeria over a three-year period completed field studies involving a nation-wide forest resource
inventory in mangrove, swamp, tropical high forest and savannah ecosystems leading to
preparation of sustainable forest management plans.
Solomon Islands two years as an in-country advisor developing and implementing resource
management guidelines, environmental education awareness programs and environmental
legislation for sustainable use of tropical forest and marine ecosystems.
Mali three field seasons completing an ecological description of sahel vegetation and recording
measurements of near surface wind-flow for research on desertification.
Papua New Guinea two and one half years as head of the botany section ofthe PNG Forestry
College leading to field studies in the ecology of tropical montane systems, and environmental
impact assessments of logging and mining operations.
Sierra Leone two years as senior lecturer at the University of Sierra Leone included field studies
on the ecology and management of Guinea Savannah for the countries first national park and
environmental impact assessments of bauxite and rutile mining operations.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
8RENT TEGlER, 8.S.:;. !I!LSG. Ph.D.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Ecological Monitoring
. Developing a Monitoring Strategy for forests in the Region of Halton. 2005 (ongoing)
. Enhancing Community Based Monitoring in Canada: Exploring the role of Environment
Canada. 2004
. Monitoring Fire Management at Rondeau Provincial Park - 2002
. Criteria and Indicators to Monitor Sustainable Ecosystem Management - 2002
. Developing an Approach to Inventory, Monitor, Assess and Report on Long Term Ecological
Health and Integrity and the Cumulative Effects of Human Activities in Ontario's Provincial
Parks and Conservation Reserves - 2001
. Torrance Creek Sub-watershed Plan Monitoring Strategy - 2001
. Core Monitoring Variables for Tracking Ecosystem Change - 2001
. Workshop on Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management, 1999
. Efficacy Testing of Core Monitoring Variables. 1999
. Selecting Core Monitoring Variables for Tracking Ecosystem Change at EMAN Sites. 1999
. Niagara Escarpment Cumulative Effects Monitoring. 1996
. Rare Plant Monitoring Program - Georgian Bay Islands National Park. 1992
Natural Areas Evaluation and Management
. Significant valleylands study in the Region of Waterloo. 2005 (ongoing)
. Significant woodland study in the Region of York. 2005 (ongoing)
. Assessing the significance of woodlands in the rural areas of the City of London. 2005
(ongoing)
. Ecological Land Classification in the Hudson Bay Lowlands. 2004
. Ondo State (Nigeria) Ecologically Sensitve Area Study - 2003
. Killarney Signature Site Detailed Life Science Inventory - 2003
. Development of a Tallgrass Prairie and Savannah Prescribed Fire Expert System - 2002
. Management Framework for Cruickston Park, Cambridge, Ontario - 2001
. Evaluation of the Ecological (Life Sciences) Values of the Lake Nipigon Basin Provincial
Parks/Conservation Reserves/Enhanced Management Areas - 2001
. Algoma Headwaters and Adjoining Waterway Provincial Parks and Spanish River Provincial
Park Including Biscotasi Provincial Park Life Science Study Report - 2001
. Importation Control of Alien Species Entering Canada. 2000
. Integrated Protected Areas and Conservation Management in Romania. 1997- 1998.
. Georgian Bay Islands Greater Park Ecosystem Study. 1994-1998
. Rouge Park Vegetation Management Plan. 1996
. Gap Analysis and Candidate Area Selection for Life Science Representation in Site District
4E-3. 1994
. Evaluation of Environmentally Sensitive Area Program in Halton R.M. 1990-1993.
. Identification and Prioritization of Wetland Habitats in Georgian Bay Islands N. P., 1993.
. Zone 1 and Environmentally Sensitive Site Designation - St. Lawrence Islands N. P. 1992.
. Zone I and Environmentally Sensitive Site Designation - Georgian Bay Island N.P. 1991.
. Massasauga Wildlands Provincial Park Supplementary Life Science Inventory. 1991.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists In Sustainable Landscape Planning
BRENT TEGLER, RSc. iVI.
lh D
, ~ .. .
Ecosystem Modelling
. Parks Canada development of conceptual ecosystem Model Training package for key park
ecosystems within Canada 2005 (ongoing)
. Parks Canada development of park-wide conceptual ecosystem models for Bruce Peninsula
National Park, Fathom Five National Marine Park, and Georgian Bay Islands National Park
2005 (ongoing)
. Training workshop for USAID in Senegal creating conceptual models for sustainable
development projects using GeoNetWeaver decision support software. 2004.
Natural Heritage Systems
. Durable Halton Plan (Growth Management Study) ongoing
. North Pickering Land Exchange Natural Heritage System 2005
. Richmond Hill Corridors Study. 1998
. St. Clair Natural Heritage System. 1997.
. Rouge Duffins Natural Heritage System. 1996.
Sustainable Forest Management
. Caribou Forest Independent Forest Audit 2005
. Assessing the Role Forests in Parks and Protected Areas and Private Woodlands in meeting
Canada's objectives under the Kyoto Protocol. 2003.
. Forest Resources Study - Nigeria 1996-1999
Ecological Restoration
. Restoration of DiBiase property watercourse 2005 (ongoing)
. Brighton Beach Power Ecological Restoration. 2003.
. Vegetation Restoration Planning. Sandbanks Provincial Park - 2003
. Red Cedar Savannah Restoration Plan - Point Pelee National Park. 1993-4
Sustainable Urban Environments
. York District Secondary Plan Development 2005 (ongoing)
. Mitchell Farm Phase II, Stage 1 Environmental Implementation - 2001
. Review of Cawthra Woods Urban Forest Management Plan. 1996
. Huron Environmental Area Co-operative Project, Kitchener. 1992
PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS
Tegler, B. 2004. The Role of Industry in Community Based Monitoring. Paper prepared for
special session Linking Ecological Monitoring to Decision-Making at Community and
Landscape Scales at the CAMESA Monitoring Science and Technology Symposium,
Denver CO, Sept 21-24,2004.
Tegler, B. 2004. Woodland Management for Ecological Values. Paper prepared for the
Carolinian Canada Conference, Kings College, London ON, May 11, 2004
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists In Sustainable Landscape Planning
BRENT TEGL.:R, B Be. .'11
"' "'1' D'
."'. ~ I. _.
Tegler, B. 2003. Science in Support of Community and Landscape/Seascape Sustainability:
Concepts of Sustainability. Paper prepared for the EMAN National Science Meeting,
Halifax, NS, November 28, 2003.
Tegler, B. 2003. Tallgrass Prairie and Savanna Prescribed Fire Decision Support System. Paper
prepared for Tallgrass Ontario Conference, Ridgetown College, Ridgetown ON, 2003.
Tegler, B. 2003. Monitoring Forest Management Unit Scale Sustainability. Paper prepared for
the World Forestry Congress, Quebec City PQ, Sept 20-28, 2003.
Tegler, B. and Brdar, C. 2003. Vegetation Restoration Planning at Sandbanks Provincial Park.
2003 PRFO Proceedings. Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo.
Johnson, M. A. and Tegler, B. 2002. Monitoring Fire Management of Oak Savanna and Tall
Grass Prairie in Rondeau Provincial Park. 2002 PRFO Proceedings. Heritage Resources
Centre, University of Waterloo, pp 269-282.
Akindele, S. 0., J. Dyck, B. Tegler, F. F. Akindunni, P. M. Papka and O. A. Olaleye (2001).
Estimates of Nigeria 's Timber Resources. Ill: Popoola, 1., J. E. Abu and P. L Oni
(Editors). Forestry and National Development. Proceedings, 27th Annual Conference of
Forestry Association of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria September 17 - 21,2001. pp. 1 -11.
Sharp, M. and Tegler, B. 2001. An Approach for Monitoring in Ontario's Provincial Parks and
Protected Areas. Ecological Integrity and Protected Areas, 2001 PRFO Proceedings.
Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo, pp 363-369.
Tegler, B., M.J. Sharp and M. Johnson. 2001. Ecological Monitoring and Assessment
Network's Proposed Core Monitoring Variables: An Early Warning of Environmental
Change. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment vol. 67, pp 29-56.
Tegler, B., MJ. Sharp and M. Johnson. 1999. Georgian Bay Greater Park Ecosystem: A bio-
regional approach to conservation. Paper presented to the Parks Research Forum of
Ontario Conference, April 22nd, 1999, Guelph, Ontario.
Tegler, Band D. Ramsay. 1998. Terrestrial Ecology Monitoring and Regional Landscape
Planning: The Niagara Escarpment Experience. Paper presented at the Natural Areas
Association Conference, October 6-10,1998, Mackinac Island, Michigan.
Tegler, B. and J. Robinson. 1995. Western Province Resource Management Ordinance. Gizo,
Solomon Islands, 24pp..
Tegler, B. 1995. Forest Management Policy, Western Province, Solomon Islands. 4pp..
Tegler, B. 1994. Canary in a Coal Mine: Environmental Change in the South Pacific.
Environmental Video, 31 min.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialist, in Sustainable Landscape Planning
BRENT TEGLER, B.Se. M.Sc. Ph.D.
Tegler B. 1990. Measurement of wind profiles in plant communities of Mali, West Africa. Paper
presented to the Canadian Association of Geographers in Ontario, February 1990.
Tegler B. 1990. Desertification: Is the cause climate or human? Video presentation produced for
CUSO Guelph, 57min.
Tegler B. 1984. Woody Regeneration in Anthropogenic Grassland, Papua New Guinea.
Conference paper, Ninth meeting ofPNG Botanical Society, Madang, Papua New
Guinea.
Tegler B. & Kershaw K.A. 1981. The Seasonal Variation ofthe Heat Stress Response of
Cladonia rangiferina. New Phytologist v.87, pp395-401.
Tegler B. & Kershaw K.A. 1980. The control of seasonal rates of net photosynthesis by
moisture, light, and temperature in Cladonia rangiferina. Canadian Journal of Botany,
v.58(l7), ppI851-1858.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Pfanning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
Education
M.Sc., Zoology, University of Guelph, 1982
B.Sc., Honours Biology, Acadia University, 1978
Related Experieuce
Sarah Mainguy has 20 years of experience in assessment of habitat for flora and fauna and determination of
potential ecosystem stress. Her extensive field skills include wetland evaluation, the identification of breeding birds
and amphibiaus by song, plant community mapping and classification, and mapping and identification of significant
animal and plant Species at Risk in wetland and upland areas. She has conducted studies of both vegetation and
wildlife in the course of extensive inventories of wilde mess in five Ontario Living Legacy protected areas in
Ontario, as well as inventories in smaller urban natural areas.
After completing botanical and wildlife inventories, Ms. Mainguy determines habitat elements essential to the
persistence of wildlife and vegetation such as linkages, configuration and size of habitat blocks, surface and
groundwater patterns, and topographic, structural, or vegetation diversity. She uses assessments of ecosystem
stresses and natural features to develop opportunities and constraints maps, broad-scale environmental management
plans, and specific recommendations to preserve significant woodlands, wetlands, and other natural features in the
vicinity of proposed development. She has provided testimony as an expert witness at both a trial involving
environmental issues and at an 0 MB hearing.
CAREER SUMMARY
North - South Environmental Inc. (2000 to present) - Euviroumental Biologist
Responsible for project management and completion including proposal writing, client liaison, project supervision,
field studies, data analysis, evaluation of findings and production of final reports.
Gore and Storrie Limited /CH2MHiII Limited. (1990 to 2000) - Environmeutal Scientist
Environmental Scientist providing consulting services for a complete range of environmental projects.
The Landplau Collaborative Ltd. (1988 to 1992) - Euviroumental Biologist
Conducted enviromnental studies and provided input into landscape planning and design projects.
University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College (1983-1988) - Research Technician, Research Assistant
Primarily responsible for laboratory studies of stress and hormone synthesis in pigs, in live cultures and in situ.
Canadian Wildlife Service and Acadia University (1977-1979) - Field Assistant
Seasonal field assistant on projects banding shorebirds in the James Bay Lowlands, Ontario; studying behaviour of
great blue herons in the Bay of Fundy; and studying effects of spruce budworm spraying on white-throated sparrows
along the Miramichi River, New Brunswick.
Canadian Crossroads International (May-December 1979) - Volunteer Service
Volunteered as a cultural exchange student in Lochinvar National Park, Zambia, Central Africa, re-designing
educational materials and assisting with scientific projects on parasite loads in ungulates.
Additional Training
. 5-Day southern Ontario Ecological Land Classification Training Course, Ministry of Natural Resources and
Gartner-Lee Limited, May 13-17,2002
. The Ontario 5-Day Wetland Evaluation System Training Course (combined northern and southern courses), Ontario
Ministry ofN atural Resources, 1996
. OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Site Worker training, DAS Enviromnental, Waterloo, Ontario, 2000.
. Short course on phytoremediation technology, CH2MHill Limited, 1999.
. Training seminar for Ecological Land Classification protocol, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guelph, Ontario; 1998
. Tralning session for the use of Natural Heritage Training Manual (and other manuals) in developing Impact
Assessment and otherwise implementing the Provincial Policy Statement, 1997
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
o The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Training Session, Ontario MinislIy ofNatnral Resources, 1995
o Training workshop on the Revised Class Environmental Assessment, Ontario MinislIy of Environment and Energy,
1993
o Taxonomy of Seed Plants, University of Guelph, 1990
Representative Prujects
Species at Risk
o Field researcher, report author and project manager for a study identifYing significaot plaot communities (using
ELC protocols) aod Species at Risk on Middle Islaod, part of Point Pelee-Middle Islaod National Park in Lake
Erie. GPS locations of flora Species at Risk were obtained by a team of botanists, and detailed mapping was
produced showing each species' distribntion.
o Researcher and principal report anthor for a study of impacts on plant Species at Risk related to white-tailed
deer in Point Pelee National Park, Ontario.
o Researcher aod principal report author for a literatnre review following COSEWIC format of the status and
distribution of the West Virginia white butterfly (Pieris virginiensis), a formerly endangered species, in Ontario.
The recommended upgrade to this species' status, to Special Concern, was adopted by the Ontario MinislIy of
Natural Resources.
o Field biologist and principal report author for a two-year field study to confirm the upgraded status of the West
Virginia White butterfly, formerly considered an endaogered species, in Ontario.
o Researcher and principal report author for a review of methods to control deer populations that were threatening
Species at Risk at Point Pelee National Park, Ontario.
Ontario Provincial Park Evaluation of Life science Features
o Project manager, field team leader and principal author for a study of the Grand River aod Whitemao's Creek
Candidate ANSI in Braot County, Ontario. Comprehensive inventories of flora aod fauna were conducted to
obtain information that could be compared to the criteria used for ANSI designation. Provincially significaot
species and Species at Risk were located with a GPS receiver aod mapped. Prairie and savannah indicators
were also mapped.
o Project manager, field team leader and principal author for Life Science Inventory ofWasaga Beach Provincial
Park. The park was evaluated in terms of representation, condition, diversity, ecological functions and special
featnres. Provincially significant plaot communities aod species were identified and mapped throughout the
park. Recommendations promoted active maoagement ofthese distnrbaoce-dependent communities with fire.
o Project manager, field team leader, biologist and principal author for life science inventories ofthe Killarney
Signature Site, recently proposed in Ontario's Living Legacy Laod Use Strategy. Over 60,000 ha ofwetlaod,
forest and rock barren were initially scoped with the aid of aerial photographs, and then over 170 sample
inventories were conducted in order to determine representation and significance of wetlands, forests and rock
barrens. Findings aod recommendations from this report will be used as the initial step in park maoagement
planning.
o Field team leader aod principal report author for Life Science Evaluation of the Lingham Lake, Mount Moriah
aod Elzevir Peatlaod Conservation Reserves and intervening laods near Madoc, Ontario, proposed for Ontario's
Living Legacy Land Use Strategy. Over 100 inventories were conducted in polygons throughout the three
areas,
o Project maoager, field team leader, biologist and principal author for life science inventories of the Algoma
Headwaters and Spanish River Signature Sites, two protected areas recently proposed in Ontario's Living
Legacy Laod Use Strategy. Over ISO sample inventories were conducted in 110,000 ha of well and, forest aod
rock barren to determine significant features, in order to evaluate representation aod recommend protection.
o Wildlife biologist aod principal report author for a study identifYing and summarizing life science features in
the Nipigon Basin, determining their significance aod representation and principal stressors, and recommending
further studies.
o Wildlife biologist aod report co-author for a reconnaissance life and earth science inventory of the Nipigon
River, which involved wildlife surveys and the assessment of important habitat.
o Researcher and principal report author for a study of impacts of white-tailed deer on rare plants, specialty crop
farming and vehicle collisions, and recommendations for control of deer, at the Pinery Provincial Park, Ontario.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
Vegetation and Wildlife inventory/Plant Community Classification Projects
. Task manager, field researcher and report author for a project involving Natural Heritage System mapping and a
Comprehensive Environmental Impact Study, in the 80 km2 Alder and Upper Strasburg Creek watersheds,
Region of Waterloo.
. Project manager, field researcher and report author responsible for classification, mapping and discussion of
plant communities according to ELC protocols, mapping of significant species and management
recommendations for the Limehouse Conservation Area in Halton Region.
. Field researcher and report co-author for studies of plant and wildlife communities (according to ELC
protocols), significant species and trail management in Hungry Hollow, near Georgetown, Region of Halton.
. Field researcher, report author and project manager for a study documenting wildlife and vegetation features
(using ELC protocols) at the Mississauga Garden-Park site on the Credit River in Mississauga.
. Field biologist, report author and project manager for a study of wildlife and habitat in the Credit Valley, for the
City of Mississauga. The study entailed extensive wildlife inventories throughout the valley and use of
indicator species to map priority habitats for protection.
. Field biologist (botany and wildlife) and principal report author for an Environmental Impact Summary ofthe
Victoria Road residential development in Guelph, Ontario.
. Biologist responsible for plant community classification, botany and wildlife inventories of a wide area
proposed for residential development in Holland Landing, Ontario. Tasks included assessment of opportunities
and constraints, delineation of significant features and assistance with public consultation.
. Wildlife biologist, botanist and principal report author for botanical and faunal inventory and vegetation
classification and mapping of a 10-km' area of riparian woodlands, wetlands and agricultural land proposed for
residential development near Bolton, Ontario. Floristic quality analysis was used to compare vegetation quality
in areas along Cold Creek and in isolated wetlands west of Cold Creek, in the area of the Oak Ridges Moraine.
Also included was determination of the use of ephemeral pools on agricultural land by pond-spawning frogs and
recommendations for conservation.
. Biologist and report co-author for wildlife inventories of natural areas and development of priorities to conserve
important natural features for the Town of Richmond Hill's natural areas inventory in the North Urban Area.
. Biologist for wildlife inventories of natural areas within the Sawmill Creek watershed in the Region of Ottawa-
Carleton and developing a master drainage plan aimed at conserving important natural features.
. Field biologist and report co-author for an inventory and analysis of wildlife populations for the Markham
Natural Features Study and development of priorities for the conservation of important natural features.
. Field biologist and report co-author for a detailed breeding bird inventory using modified point counts to
determine numbers and densities of breeding birds and the potential effects of a condominium development
proposing to recreate habitat for wildlife in Victoria Point, Orillia.
. Field biologist and report co-author for a detailed breeding bird inventory and evaluation of runway and
development options for the Lester B. Pearson International Airport Redevelopment.
. Field biologist and report co-author for faunal and botanical inventories and discussion of significant features
associated with a development adjacent to a variety of watercourses and wetland features. Locations have
included Kingston, Kitchener, Brantford, Peterborough, and Belleville.
Sewer and Water Class Environmental Assessment Projects
. Task manager, field biologist and report author for evaluation of natural features and significance of habitat for
breeding waterfowl and passerines at a sewage lagoon in Muskoka District, for a class EA evaluating
alternatives for improved sewage treatment. The site is renowned throughout Ontario for its value for bird
watching, and the report included recommendations for ways to mitigate loss of sewage lagoon area.
. Botanist and wildlife biologist for the Devil's Creek EnItancement and Restoration Study. A route for a sanitary
trunk sewer was proposed through a Provincially Significant Wetland, as there were no feasible alternatives.
Initial inventories of the mosaic of fen, marsh, swamp, and woodland west of Cambridge included determining
their foundations in groundwater discharge and surface water patterns. Floristic quality analysis was used to
compare vegetation quality in wetlands of different origin. These analyses were used to develop a
comprehensive plan for the conservation and restoration of vegetation and wildlife along the route. Impacts of
sewer construction were evaluated, and recommendations for mitigation of impacts, construction supervision,
restoration and post-construction monitoring of restoration conducted after installation was complete.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
o Wildlife biologist, botanist and report co-author for three years of inventory and evaluation of impacts from
residential and sanitary sewer route development that potentially affected a provincially Significant Wetland
and Environmentally Sensitive Area in Ajax, Ontario. Responsibilities included determining impacts from
alternative sewer construction techniques (directional drilling and open cut) and alternative routes through the
wetland.
o Biologist and planner for an evaluation of alternatives for improving drinking water quality for residents ofthe
village ofFreelton, Ontario. Residents opted to build a water tower to provide safe drinkiug water and increased
flow for fire control, instead of relying on private wells.
o Biologist responsible for evaluating environmental impacts related to alternatives for installation of a forcemain
route (including directional drilling and open cut) near Sudbury, Ontario.
o Biologist responsible for evaluating alternatives for providing sewage treatment to residents of Azilda, Ontario.
o Biologist and report co-author assisting in assessing impacts and writing an environmental study report for the
pipeline crossing of the Rideau River, Gloucester.
o Biologist for a study of the environmental setting offour sewage treatment plants, including the Main
Treatment Plant, as part of an Environmental Assessment of treatment options for the City of Toronto.
Wetland Evaluation and Delineation
o Botanist, Wildlife biologist, report co-author and project manager for two years of wetland evaluations (using
Ministry of Natural Resources protocols), including comprehensive baseline wildlife, fisheries, and botanical
inventories of nine wetlands and intervening uplands, in radioisotope-contaminated terrain at the Atomic
Energy of Canada Limited Chalk River property. Findings included a Provincially Significant Wetland and
several provincially significant upland plant species. Findings were used as the basis for ecological risk
assessment by AECL.
o Botanist, wildlife biologist and report author for wetland evaluations (using Ministry of Natural Resources
protocols) and Natural Heritage Ecosystem mapping and planning within the Upper Strasburg Creek watershed
in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario.
o Biologist for delineation of wetlands within a pipeline easement using U.S. Army Corps of Engineers protocols
along a 300 mile pipeline route through northern Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Road Impact Assessment
o Conducted an evaluation of vegetation and habitat features in the area of a proposed intersection improvement
in Holland Landing, Simcoe County.
o Assisted in evaluating a highway re-route in central Illinois. Tasks included botanical inventories of both
floodplains and uplands, floristic quality analysis and identification of state-listed Illinois Sand Prairie plant
communities.
o Field biologist and principal report author for an impact assessment of a highway re-route near Detroit,
Michigan.
o Responsible for developing a habitat matrix for Ontario wetland birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals and a
set of scoring criteria for determining their vulnerability to road construction, for the Ministry of Transportation.
Impacts of Trail Development
o Field biologist, report author and task manager for evaluation of several alternate routes aloug the Thames River
in Loudou, Ontario, to determine suitability as a recreational trail, based on floristic quality analysis of various
plant communities and wildlife habitat value.
Restoration
o Field biologist and report co-author responsible for pre-constructiou inventories, restoration, and post-
construction evaluation of restored vegetation quality (using FQI) and wildlife along a restored constructed
sanitary sewer route through a provincially significant wetland and Environmentally Significant Area in
Cambridge, Ontario.
o Biologist assisting in developing appropriate lists of native restoration materials for wetlands and uplands in
Cambridge, Shelburne, and Ottawa, Outario.
o Author for sections oftwo manuals of restoration guidelines for the Waterfront Regeneration Trust.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
Ecological Literature Review
. Co-author of a literature study on the state of the environment of the Great Slave Lake aquatic ecosystem. The
report assessed a diverse range of topics related to both the aquatic ecosystem and the land-water interface of
Great Slave Lake.
. Author of a review ofthe benefits of upland buffers to tidal marshes on the Delaware River in New Jersey and
Delaware. Topics reviewed included the function of various types and widths of buffers for attenuation of
excess nutrients, storage of flood waters, provision of adjunct habitat for marsh species, provision of corridors
and improvement of natural cover in the landscape, and provision of habitat for terrestrial species.
. Biologist for collecting and summarizing information on natural features, fisheries, and benthic invertebrates for
creeks in the City of Mississauga, as part of a stormwater quality control study.
Ecological Evaluation of Solid Waste Sites
. Conducted an evaluation of the vegetation in an area of proposed expansion for the Barrie Landfill.
. Botanist, wildlife biologist, principal report author and project manager for environmental studies of a
municipal solid waste facility on Manitoulin Island. Constraints included wetlands and regionally significant
wildlife. Studies conducted by other team members included noise and dust and visual analyses.
. Biologist for botanical and wildlife inventories in the vicinity of landfills or proposed landfill sites in Huron
County, Weiland, and Brockville. These studies included evaluation and recommendations for mitigation of
impacts from proposed developments on surrounding ecological features, including provincially significant
wetlands and plant species.
. Biologist for wildlife inventories for a proposed solid waste management area, which included an incinerator.
Surveys included detection of amphibians and breeding birds and live-trapping snakes and mammals for
Enviromax and the Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfolk.
Natural Treatment Technology
. Biologist responsible for ecological assessment of alternatives, including constructed wetlands, for providing
storrnwater treatment for flows on the west side of High Park, Toronto.
. Botanist and wildlife biologist for assessment of potential impacts to provincially significant vegetation from a
proposed treatment wetland on Spring Creek in High Park, Toronto.
. Biologist for a project to develop a set of guidelines for evaluating significant features and functions in natural
areas proposed for constructed treatment wetlands in Alberta. The guidelines were in the form of questionnaires
that suggested habitat functions and values for both vegetation and wildlife to be evaluated before proceeding
with treatment wetland construction. Extensive appendices included an aunotated bibliography of government
documents relating to wetlands and habitat, lists of significant plant and animal species and communities, and a
table identifying potential direct and indirect impacts to natural features from effluent.
. Biologist for evaluation of potential impacts to a marl wetland in Peter Lougheed Provincial Park in Alberta
from a proposed sewage outlet.
. Botanist and wildlife biologist for assessment of potential impacts to the Provincially Significant Presqu'ile
Wetland Complex from a proposed treatment wetland in Brighton, Ontario.
. Biologist and modeller assessing the feasibility of installing, and then implementing, poplar plantations for
reducing infiltration (and consequent leachate production) on closed landfills in Muskoka and Simcoe.
. Biologist responsible for selection of appropriate plant material for dewatering and stabilization of lime sludge
at ICI Canada, Samia, Ontario. A list of native calciphiles was prepared to help predict whether there were
native plants that could thrive in the highly alkaline conditions of the sludge. Other options examined were
hybrid poplar and other fast-growing, adaptable non-native species.
Nuisance Wildlife Evaluation
. Biologist for an evaluation of the Essex Stormwater Pond, a newly constructed stormwater retention
facility/wildlife habitat area, for its potential to attract large numbers of waterfowl and gulls, which could
become a hazard to the Windsor Airport. The report included recommendations for plantings that would reduce
the use of the wetlands by gulls and geese.
. Biologist responsible for advising on methods to deter waterfowl and gulls from proposed storrnwater treatment
wetlands at Pearson International Airport.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
o Biologist responsible for conducting inventories of species and number of gulls at a proposed landfill site
expansion in Welland. Analysis included the evaluation of the potential for the expanded landfill to attract
greater numbers of gulls, which could become a hazard at the Welland Airport.
Risk Assessment
o Researcher, field biologist and principal report author for an ecological risk assessment of a P AH- contaminated
property in Guelph, Ontario.
o Biologist responsible for review of risk assessment of an arsenic-contaminated wetland in Minden, Ontario.
o Researcher, field biologist and principal report author for an ecological risk assessment of a lead- and P AH-
contaminated property in Ottawa, Ontario.
o Researcher, field biologist and principal report author for an ecological risk assessment of a TPH-contaminated
property on the Industrial Lands on the Toronto, Ontario waterfront.
o Researcher, field biologist and principal report author for an ecological risk assessment of the effects of smoke
on adjacent Environmentally Sensitive Areas from a fire-training facility proposed in Waterloo, Ontario.
o Field biologist, researcher and report co-author responsible for screening the potential for ecological risk
associated with radionuclide-contaminated groundwater at Pickering Nuclear Generating Station.
o Researcher, field biologist, principal report author and project manager for a study of valued ecosystem
components in the vicinity of Gentilly-2 Nuclear Generating Station, Quebec and Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station, New Brunswick.
o Biologist responsible for evaluating risk to vegetation and wildlife from contaminated groundwater near
Brantford.
Contaminated Site Assessment
o Field biologist and report author for botanical and wildlife inventories and mapping of communities around an
abandoned gold mine and arsenic treatment plant owned by the Ministry of the Environment in Deloro, Ontario,
as part of planning for remediation at the site. Floristic quality analysis was used to compare plant communities
affected by mine tailings or leachate with uncontaminated areas, and to provide a baseline for future monitoring
and restoration following remediation. Sarah provided expert witness testimony at a provincial court case
involving site remediation, which contributed to a decision in favour of the Ministry of the Environment.
o Biologist for botanical and wildlife inventory of a contaminated site in Ohio; responsible for determining
potential pathways for contaminants to enter significant natural systems.
o Report writer, editor and reviewer for a series of quarterly and final monitoring reports on the movement and
characterization of contaminated groundwater at three plasticiser plants in Ontario and Qnebec.
Membership in Professional Organizations
Society of Wetlands Scientists
Ontario Field Ornithologists
Federation of Ontario Naturalists
Bird Studies Canada
. Field Botanists of Ontario (President)
Selected Publications aud Preseutations
Sarah Mainguy, Karu Chinniah and John Pries. Practicality of Guidelines for the Approval and Design of Natural and
Treatment Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. In Treatment Wetlandsfor Water Quality Improvement,
Proceedings of the Quebec 2000 Conference, pp 151-159. CH2MHill Canada Limited, Waterloo, Ontario.
A. Fausto, Sarah Mainguy and E. Pastrik. Mitigating bupacts of Sewer Construction through Wetland Restoration and
Habitat Creation: the Devil' s Creek Trunk Sewer Project. Proceedings of the 1998 Society of Ecological Restoration
Conference, Markham, Ontario, 1998.
Sarah Mainguy, Karu Chinniah and John Pries. Guidelines for the Approval and Design of Natural and Treatment
Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Report for Standards and Gnidelines Branch, Environmental Assessment
Division, Environmental Service, Alberta Environmental Protection. March 2000. Website:
http://www.gov.ab.caJenv/protenf/publicationslGuidelinesforNaturalConstructedTreatmentWetlandsMarOO.pdf
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainabie Landscape Planning
SARAH K. MAINGUY B.Sc. M.Sc.
With ESG International and Hough-Stansbury, Limited. Restoring Natural Habitats. Toronto: The Waterfront
Regeneration Trust. Ontario. 1995. 179 pp.
With Gore and Storrie Limited. Reconnaissance Life and Earth Science Inventory of the Nipigon River. Report for the
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Nipigon District. 1994.
With The Landplan Collaborative Limited. The Effects of Browsing and Trampling by White-tailed Deer on Pinery
Provincial Park and its Environs. Report for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Wingham. 1991.
With The Landplan Collaborative Limited. Distribution of the West Virginia White Butterfly in Ontario (Final Report).
Report for Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Central Region, Cambridge, Ontario. 1991.
Sarah Mainguy and V. G. Thomas. "Comparisons of Body Reserve Build-up and Use in Several Groups of Canada
Geese." Canadian Journal of Zoology. 63(1985): 1765-1772.
V.G. Thomas, Sarah Mainguy and P. Prevett. "Predicting Fat Content of Lesser Snow and Canada Geese from
Abdominal Fat Depot Weights." Journal of Wildlife Management. 47(1983):1115-1 119.
Comparison of Body Reserve Build-up and Use in Several Groups afCanada Geese. Guelph, Ontario. M.Sc. Thesis,
University of Guelph Press. 1982.
Sarah Mainguy and V.G. Thomas. Pre-breeding fat and protein reserves in northern- and southern-nesting Canada
Geese. Presented at 43rd Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Wichita, Kansas, USA. 1981.
Sarah Mainguy and V.G. Thomas. Pre-breeding fat reserves of two races of Canada Geese. Presented at the Canadian
Society for Zoologists 20th Annual Meeting, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. 1981.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH E. PlETT, 8.Sc.(Env)
PERSONAL DATA
Citizenship: Canadian
Language: English
EDUCATION
B.Sc.(Env) University of Guelph (2006). Bachelor of Environmental Science, Honours.
CERTIFICATION
Ontario Wetland Evaluation Training Course (2007). Ministry of Natural Resources.
Ecological Land Classification certification (2004). Ministry of Natural Resources.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Field Botanists of Ontario (Newsletter Editor)
CAREER SUMMARY
North - South Environmental Inc. (2006 to present) - Ecologist
Responsible for field studies, client liaison, data input and analysis, evaluation of findings and input into
final reports.
Natural Resource Solutions Inc. (September 2006) - Terrestrial Biologist
Responsible for vegetation inventories, bat monitoring, raptor surveys, fall migration surveys, and bat
mortality surveys.
The Nature Conservancy of Canada (May-Angust 2005 and 2006) - Shell Conservation Intern,
Snmmer Field Technician
Primarily responsible for field studies, natural area stewardship, and the preparation of management plans.
Involved in the management of volunteers during special events and stewardship activities. Implementing
stewardship and restoration initiatives, as outlined in the management plan for the property. Aided in the
completion of breeding bird surveys.
Hamilton Conservation Authority (May-August 2004) - Ecological Land Classification Technician,
Crew Leader
Responsible for completing Ecological Land Classifications within the City of Hamilton. Organized and
lead a team of technicians to perform this task. This position mainly involved inventorying the flora and
fauna located in natural areas within the City of Hamilton municipal boundaries. This process required
thorough flora and fauna identification skills, aerial photograph interpretation, as well as orientation,
organization, and leadership skills.
Hamilton Conservation Authority (May-August 2003) - Ecological Land Classification Technician
Primarily responsible for completing Ecological Land Classifications within the City of Hamilton.
A SHORT SELECTION OF PROJECT EXPERIENCE IS PROVIDED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH E. PlETT, B.Sc.(E:nv)
Matachewan Environmental Impact Study 2007
Sarah was involved in the field data collection for this environmental impact study in northern Ontario.
The field component included peregrine falcon surveys, owl play-backs, marsh monitoring, amphibian
surveys, breeding bird surveys, vegetation inventories, classification of vegetation communities, and
incidental mammal surveys. Sarah also participated in the field study preparation and air photo
interpretation to ensure proper coverage of all vegetation community types as well as landform types.
Once the data was collected, the vegetation communities were delineated on the air photo.
Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity 2007
A tree survey was completed to determine the effects of additional structures being added to a residential
property located on the Oak Ridges Moraine. The development was thoroughly examined to ensure
conformity with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Recommendations were made to decrease
the amount of trees lost and mitigate negative impacts on the surrounding natural environment.
Environmental Inspections - Ongoing
Environmental Inspections are carried out on a number of residential development sites within the City of
Guelph. These inspections are completed to ensure that the developments are complying with
recommendations made in the environmental impact reports and to ensure that proper sediment erosion
control measures are maintained. Reports are completed monthly and submitted to the City of Guelph for
review.
Toronto ESA and PSW Updates 2007
This project involved updating information pertaining to the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) and
the Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW) within the City of Toronto. Field tasks for this project
included checking wetland boundaries, searching for seepage areas and significant species, as well as a
general inventory of flora and fauna at each site. As well, the wetlands were evaluated according to the
Wetland Evaluation System for Southern Ontario to determine the overall score for the wetland
communities.
Sault Ste. Marie Wind Turbine Monitoring 2006
Sarah has been involved in a variety of monitoring efforts to determine the effects or potential effects of
wind turbine farms. This survey consisted of walking transects on the graded turbine pad and the
surrounding forest, as required to reach the set radius from the base ofthe turbine. This radius was
determined as the distance to which mor1alities can be found around a turbine, as established through
reviewing current literature on the subject. A trained dog was also used to search for bird and bat
mortalities under the turbines. Searcher efficiency tests were performed to determine the probability of a
technician locating a dead bird or bat within the specified search area. In addition, scavenger surveys were
performed to detern1ine the rate of predation on dead birds and bats under the turbines. Both the searcher
efficiency test and the scavenger surveys were performed to determine the likelihood of finding mortalities,
and the likelihood of mortalities being available to be found, respectively such that accuracy of results
could be determined.
Manitoulin Island Wind Turbine Environmental Impact Assessment 2006
This purpose ofthis project was to determine the potential impacts of developing a wind turbine farm on a
property on Manitoulin Island. Raptor surveys were performed in the Fall. During these raptor surveys,
incidental bird observations were also recorded. In addition, radar and acoustic bat surveys were
performed in the evening to monitor bat movement in the area.
Nichol Drain Sub-watershed Study 2006
This study involved inventorying natural areas within the Nichol Drain Sub-watershed. The flora and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
SARAH E. PlETT, g.Sc.(Env)
fauna were inventoried within the woodlots. Soil samples were taken and analyzed in the field to
determine the soil structure and composition of each community. The communities were each classified
according to the Ecological Land Classification system for Southern Ontario. Other notes pertaining to
disturbance and anthropogenic effects were also noted in the field. A database was created and the data
was analyzed to determine the quality of the flora and fauna identified in each community type.
Recommendations were made pertaining to the maintenance, significance, or improvement of the natural
areas.
Northern Bruce Peninsula Natural Area Management Plan - Davis Property 2006.
This study involved an inventory of a natural area to identifY significant and sensitive features on a
property owned by the Nature Conservancy of Canada. This information was used to identifY conservation
targets and threats, develop management recommendations that included permitted uses and environmental
restoration priorities. This project included a public participation component where the public was
involved in the stewardship of the property.
Northern Bruce Peninsula Natural Area Management Plan - Corisande Bay Property 2006
This study involved an inventory of a natural area to identifY significant and sensitive features on a
property owned by the Nature Conservancy of Canada. This information was used to identifY conservation
targets and threats, develop management recommendations that included permitted uses and environmental
restoration priorities.
City of Hamilton Natural Area Study 2003-2004.
This project consisted primarily of classifYing natural areas within the City of Hamilton using Ecological
Land Classification methods. In addition, landowner contact and relations were an important component
to this task.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
RICHARD CZOK, B.A.
Education B.A. Honours Geography, McMaster University, 1990
Career Summary North-South Environmental Inc. (1999 to present)
Involved in all aspects of collection, integration, coordination and management of
spatial data. Relevant work experience includes data input and conversion of hard
copy material into digital format and the amalgamation of data from different
sources.
Geomatics Iuternational Inc. (1993 to 1999)
Responsibilities include preparation, scanning and digitizing of map data for
Geographical Information Systems, encompassing map editing, composition,
production plotting and attribute table creation. Capable of GIS programming and
technology transfer. Familiar with georeferencing Landsat scenes, editing of visual
information and image enhancement in remote sensing. Performed photo
interpretation and field surveys in conjunction with vegetation, geomorphology and
soil classifications.
McMaster University, Geography Department (1989)
Research Assistant
Studied the morphometric parameters of rillenkarren development on gypsum and
compared their development to limestone rillenkarren. Performed studies of doline
development on gypsum in central Manitoba.
McMaster University, Geography Department (1988)
Monitored and analyzed a variety of coastal processes including dune development
and beach profiles by taking core samples and surveys from beach environments in
Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
McMaster University, Geography Department (1987)
Participated in an ongoing monitoring program to determine the degradation of Red
Hill Creek by taking water samples to study: discharge, sediment transport, pH
levels and salinity.
Personal
Data
Citizenship: Canadian
Language: English
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
GIS Projects
Innisfil Official Plan Review, 2006
Spatial data from a number of sources were amalgamated into a landuse map of the region. Urban,
agricultural and natural areas were defined in a present day context. A series of algorithms were used to
identify areas for potential urban and commercial/industrial development and areas for natural
preservation.
Wildlands League, Bruce Peninsula Atlas, 2005
A series of maps created for the Wildlands League Atlas showing different aspects of the Bruce
Peninsula including; residential and commercial development, recreational activity, natural and
environmentally sensitive areas, types of forest and forest density. Spatial information was gathered from
government agencies, private firms and aboriginals to provide detailed mapping of the Bruce Peninsula.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
RICHARD CZOK, B.A.
York Woodlands, 2004
Spatial data of woodland coverage of the Region of York was compared to recent aerial photos. Changes
between the spatial woodland layer and the aerial photos were identified. Edits were implemented on the
spatial data to update the woodlands layer. Additionally, an algorithm was used to identify core areas of
woodland coverage.
Peguis First Nations Land Claims, 2003
The Peguis First Nation Land Claim Evaluation project included a significant mapping component as six
consulting firms independently undertook an analysis of forest, agriculture, residential, resource
harvesting and mines analysis of land use within the Peguis Claim Lands and Reserve Lands dating from
1907 to the present. North-South Environmental Inc. was responsible for the co-ordination and
production of base mapping, the digitizing and collation of all data, the identification and correction of
conflicting depictions of land use and the production of a final time series of reconciled land use maps.
Base mapping utilized aerial photography that was scanned, joined and geocorrected using EASI/P ACE
software to produce ortho-photography. Overlay information, was digitized and analyzed using ESRl
ArcInfo software to produce final maps.
North Leslie OMB - Richmond Hill, 2003
Applied a series of parameter modifications to existing spatial data in order to develop various scenarios
for a Natural Heritage System. Produced maps and graphics for presentation to the Ontario Municipal
Board.
Nagagamisis Plateau Life / Earth Science Inventory, 2002
Digitized land features of the Nagagamisis Plateau area. Merged the land features with existing digital
vegetation to produce biophysiographic maps of the area. Statistics were used to describe the shape, size
and complexity of each individual land unit.
Spanish River / Algoma Headwaters Life Science Inventory, 2001
Amalgamated digital information from a variety of sources and digitized hardcopy information gathered
through field work to produce maps detailing the life science inventory of the Spanish River / Algoma
Headwaters. Statistical analysis was done to illustrate the diversity of species in the area.
Town of Richmond Hill Corridor Study, 1996
Digitized and compiled digital information to produce maps illustrating the need for preservation of
natural areas for the Town of Richmond Hill. Digital information was produced from air photo
interpretation and field reconnaissance. Updated the digital information received from a number of
different sources to conform to existing field conditions.
Vegetation Species Rarity of the Ottawa/Carleton Area, 1995
Created digital spatial layers of geological / geomorphological landforms and vegetation units. The
geological / geomorphological landforms were digitized from information gathered through air-photo
reconnaissance and field work. The vegetation units were combined from a variety of sources including
existing GIS databases, air photo interpretation and field work. The geological/geomorphological
landforms were merged with the vegetation units to produce maps illustrating species rarity for the
Ottawa/Carleton area.
Created digital files and attributes for a moraine study in Ontario. Other duties included digital
categorization of the drainage network and quality control of the final map composition.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
RICHARD CZOK, SA
Transferred shorelines, contours and bathometry from a GIS database for use in remote sensing
applications for the country of Nigeria.
Designed a land use database for Parks Canada requiring the capture of park boundaries to delineate
features in and surrounding Wabikimi Provincial Park and Georgian Bay Islands National Park.
Produced digital map files and database for use in a habitat monitoring program along the Niagara
Escarpment.
Converted and created digital map files showing environmentally sensitive areas (ESA) and areas of
natural and scientific interest (ANSI) in a proposed setting for the City of Guelph.
Converted data and produced digital map files and subsequent area calculations of the Brimley
Road/Scarborough Bluffs area for the purpose of aquatic vegetation restoration.
Designed digital files showing Marine Natural Regions for two areas of Canada, Lake Superior and the
Scotian Shelf, for the purposes of marine preservation.
Involved in Assessment File Conversion Project for the Ministry of North em Development and Mines.
Responsibilities included map scanning, shift supervision, technical support, preparation of final
deliverables and quality control of scanned data to be used in the ministries database.
Designed and appended digital files to an existing digital database illustrating the natural features of the
Eramosa watershed.
Produced maps illustrating specific geomorphological features found on the Tobermoray Islands on the
Bruce Peninsula.
Converted USGS data in Arc/Info format to produce a digital elevation model of the Mammoth Cave area
in Kentucky.
Created digital database illustrating sensitive environmental sites for the Town of Aurora.
Compiled information from a variety of sources and produced a series of maps illustrating the
bathymetry, chemical composition, volume calculations and depth of sediment for a proposed dredging
project in Hamilton Harbour.
Performed GIS audit of a large digital database and model structure for the state of Rondonia in Brazil.
Included in the audit was a check of the components in the database as well as the spatial data and the
relationship between the two data sets.
Digitized Forest Resource Inventory maps for the Bruce Peninsula. The polygons were subsequently
populated with attribute information from the maps and included in the final database.
Combined airphotos with vector based data to produce a map detailing the locations of significant species
for a public gardens project in Mississauga.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North-South Environmental Inc.
Specialists in Sustainable Landscape Planning
RICHARD CZOK, B.A.
Compiled digital information and produced a series of maps illustrating species diversity and land use for
an inventory study of the Lake Nipigon and surrounding area.
Remote Sensing Projects
Assisted in a vegetation-land use classification study of elk impact near the Burwash Correctional
Facility requiring georeferencing of a Landsat sub-scene.
Assisted in the editing phase of a agricultural land use classification study using satellite imagery for
specific areas of Alberta and British Columbia.
Assisted in the classification and editing phase of a land use study of the Niagara watershed using
satellite imagery, air photo interpretation and National Topographic Series (NTS) map sheets for the
Niagara Region.
I
I
~.... 'g~.. .
~
ECOLOGlCiU CONSUl TII-..JG &' DESIGN
I
Ken has been an Ecologist with D&A since 1995 and has
extensive knowledge and expertise in the field of
applied terrestrial ecology. He has participated in over
200 environmental projects for the private and public
sectors in Ontario, and provides special expertise in
natural heritage systems planning, impact assessment
and management strategies for small and large-scale
projects. Ken is well versed in relevant policies, current
practicesr and progressive strategies pertaining to
naturai heritage features in southern Ontario. He also
has expertise in the application of the Ecological Land
Classification (ELC) system having been a lead
instructor for the ELC training course since 2000. Ken
has presented and participated in numerous agency
workshops dealing with terrestriai ecology and
environmental policies.
I
I
I
I
I
In addition to being familiar with the range of habitat
types in Ontario and being a skilled field botanist, Ken
manages numerous projects and is typicaliy involved in
all aspects of them, from the initial client liaison and
field work to the final report writing, consultations and
presentations. He also provides expertise in
progressive naturai heritage planning, quarry
rehabilitation, site-specific ecological restoration and
terrestrial monitoring.
I
I
I
EDUCATION
I
1991: B.5c. (Ecology, Hons.) Univ. of Guelph
. 1994: M.5c. (Botany/Ecology) Univ. of Guelph
. Thesis: Natural fe-vegetation processes in southern
Ontario's Umestone quarries
I
Continuing Education
. 1995: Certified in southern Ontario's Wetland
Evaluation System (OWES)
. 1998: Certified in southern Ontario's Ecological
Land Classification (ELC) System
I
I
CAREER EXPERIENCE
I
From 1986 - 1992 Ken worked as a Reforestation
Technician/ Supervisor/ Surveyor in southern and
northern Ontario and British Columbia. Since 1995 he
has worked for D&A where he Is currently a Senior
Ecologist and Manager of the Environmental Sciences /
Applied Ecology Division.
I
I
I
Kenneth A. Ursie SSe, MSe
Senior Ecologist, Manager
Areas of Expertise
. Natural Heritage Planning
. Biophysical Inventories & Botanical Surveys
. Rare Species Identification & Management
. Ecosystem Monitoring & Analysis
. Wetland Evaluation & Creation
. Environmental Impact Assessments/Studies
. Habitat Rehabilitation & Restoration
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Natural Area Assessment, Restoration & Monitoring
. Waterdown Interchange Detail Design - terrestrial
Support (Burlington)
. Lyons Creek PSW Assessment (NPCA)
. Huron Natural Area Env. Studies (Kitchener)
. City ofToronto ESA & PSA Inventories
. City of Kitchener Ecological Monitoring Plan
. Strasburg Creek Terrestrial Monitoring (Kitchener)
. Mattawa Provincial Park Life Sci. Assessment
. Creditview Wetland Conservation Plan
(Mississauga)
Rondeau Park ELC & GIS Assessment (OMNR)
Town of Fort Erie Natural Areas Inventory
Turkey Point Marsh Re-evaluation (OMNR)
Marcy Woods Biological Inventory (Point Abino)
Mazinaw C1iffVeg. Survey (Bon Echo Park)
Dartnall Rd. Wetland Monitoring (Hamilton)
Urban Forest & Ravine Assessment & Management
U ofToronto Scarborough Campus Ravine Plan
Russell Hill Ravine Assessment (Toronto)
Topper Woods Management Plan (Kitchener)
South Keele Woodlot Management (Toronto)
Arbor Valley Tree Preservation (Georgetown)
Allanport Woodiot Assessment (Weiland)
Cawthra Woods Centre (Mississauga)
Watershed & Other Large-scale Studies
City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy
Town of Fort Erie Watershed Plan (NPCA)
Weiland River Fluctuations Study (NPCA)
. Hannon Creek Subwatershed Study (Hamilton)
. Davis Creek Subwatershed Study (Hamilton)
. Indian Creek SWS & Secondary Plan (Milton)
. Hanlon Ck State-of-the-Watershed Study (Guelph)
. Red Hill Creek Watershed Study (Hamilton)
. Fourteen Mile Creek Subwatershed Study (Oakville)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~...'...11'...
.~
ECOlOGICAL CONSULTIt-lG & DESIGN
PROJECT EXPERIENCE cont'd
Pit & Quarry Habitat Assessments & Management
Butler Pit Proposed Extension (RM Waterloo)
. Vinemount Quarry II Extension (Hamiiton)
. N. Dumfries Pit (Cambridge)
. Lincoln Quarry Extension (Vineland)
Quarry Rehabilitation Assessments (Napa nee)
Rare Species Recovery & Management Plans
. Rare Sedge Inventory (Hydro One)
Point Pelee National Park ELC & Rare Species
Eastern Prickly Pear Cactus - Lake Erie Sand Spit
Savannas Recovery Strategy (Parks. Canada)
. Bronte Creek Vegetation Management Plan
Spotted Wintergreen Recovery Plan (OMNR)
Cucumber Tree Habitat Mapping (Niagara)
Ginseng Monitoring (Simcoe District)
Environmental Assessments (EAs) for Road &
Municipall Provincial Infrastructure Projects
. Fort Erie industrial Park Master Servicing Pian
Aldershot GO Station EA (Burlington)
Hwy 11/17 - Hodder Ave. EA (Thunder Bay)
. Fisherman's Pier Redevelopment EA (Hamilton)
. Highway 11 Sundridge Patrol Yard (Huntsville)
Waterdown Rd. Intersection (Burlington)
Highway 69 Four-Ianing (Burwash-French River)
Highway 11/169 interchange (Gravenhurst)
. Rennie St. Landfill Class EA (Hamilton)
Habitat Creation & Restoration
. Clythe Creek Enhancement (Guelph)
St-Lawrence Starch Oak Woodland (PI. Credit)
. Dunn Valley Naturalization (Mississaugal
. Severn Sound Stream Rehabilitation Plan
Starkey Hill Prairie Restoration - GRCA (Guelph)
. Paris Golf Club Wetland & Prairie Restoration
. Downsview Park Nursery Site Design (Toronto)
Clouston Schools Habitats (Toronto)
Peer Review & Expert Witness Testimony
. Escarpment Stairs NEC Hearing (Hamilton)
. Indian Creek SIS Peer Review (Milton)
. Flamborough Quarry Peer Review (Hamilton)
Niagara River Golf Course Peer Review (Ft. Erie)
. Oak Ridges Moraine OMB (Richmond Hill)
Kenneth A. Ursie BSc, MSc
Senior Ecologist, Manager
Environmental Impact Assessment
. Red Hill Creek Expressway (Hamilton)
. Ballantrae Oak Ridges Moraine Compliance
. Community Beaches EIS (Hamilton)
. Escarpment Stairs EIS (Hamilton)
Grange Hill Developments EIS & EIR (Guelph)
. Lionhead Woodland & Wetland EIS (Brampton)
. Hillborn Woodland & Swamp EIS (Cambridge)
PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS
Ursie, K. 2005. Environmental Imoac! Studies - What
Municicalities Need to Know. Guest speaker for MNR
Vineland workshop for Niagara Region municipal planners,
Sept. 21. 2005.
Ursie, K. and P. Robertson. 2003. Ginsena Monitorinc; and
Habitat Restoration on the Ora Moraine, Simcoe Co.
Provincial Species at Risk Workshop, Apr. 9-1 1, 2003, Leslie M.
Frost Centre, Dorset, ON.
Ursie K., G. Epp and W. Pol. 2001. Panel Discussion on Case
Study for Policv. Imolementation and Monitorina. In
Proceedings of the Natural Heritage Planning Conference, King's
College, London, ON, May 1, 2001, pp. 36-50.
Ursic, K., M. Ursic and J. Dougan. 1998. A natural heritaae
aooroach to the rehabilitation of southern Ontario's
limestone auarries. Proc. of the 23rd annual meeting, CLRA &
SER Ontario. Sept. 27-30, Markham, ON.
Ursic, K.A., N.C. Kenkel and D.W. Larson. 1997. Reveaetation
dvnamics of cliff faces in abandoned limestone auarries. J.
Applied Ecology 34, 289-303.
Ursic, K.A., and J. Dougan. 1995. life Science Inventorv of the
Mazinaw Rock Cliff Face. Bon Echo Provincial Park. Dougan
and Associates Consulting Services.
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
. Lead Instructor for Ecological Land Classification
(ELC) System courses for s. Ontario, 2000 - present
Lead Facilitator & Speaker at a Wetlands Workshop
for Municipal Planners & Partners sponsored by
OMNR - Peterborough, 2007
Guest Lecturer, Field Ecology, School of
Architecture & Landscape Arch., U. of Toronto,
1995 - 2000
. Teaching Assistant for Introductory Ecology,
University of Guelph, 1992-1994
I
I
_...... ....:1 '~"
"iy
I
ECOLOG!CAl (OhISULTlNG & DESIGN
I
Margot has a decade of experience as an ecologicai
consultant and specializes in communication of
ecological concepts, approaches and
recommendations to clients. She has worked in the
private and public sectors, with agencies involved in
natural heritage planning and with the public. Over
the past six years Margot has coordinated and
managed a number of projects dealing with municipal
natural heritage assessment and planning, tree by-law
development, and ecoiogical monitoring. She has also
provided facilitation and developed materials for
educational workshops and public consultations,
provided technical support for municipal strategic
plans, and coordinated / conducted ecological
literature reviews for a variety of projects.
I
I
I
I
Through her work, Margot has developed a good
understanding of Provincial and municipal policies as
they relate to natural heritage planning in Ontario. In
addition to her project work, she also coordinates
Dougan & Associate's marketing and human resources,
and maintains an active interest in applied ecoiogical
planning trends and concepts through development of
papers / presentations for conferences, workshops and
academic institutions.
I
I
I
I
EDUCATION
1991: B.A. with distinction (History & Liberal Arts).
Concordia University, QUE
1995: M.Sc. (Botany), University of Guelph, ON
I
As part of her continuing education, Margot has
attended workshops on plant identification and pit &
quarry rehabilitation, as weil as conferences focusing
on biological research, ecological conservation,
stewardship and planning in Ontario.
I
I
CAREER EXPERIENCE
I
Areas of Expertise
. Project Coordination & Management
. Natural Heritage Planning
. Workshop Facilitation
Ecological Education (Land Stewardship Packages)
Public Consultation Materiais / Presentation
Ecological & Technical Research Support
. Corporate Promotion & Development
I
I
I
~
Margot Ursie SA, MSc
Natural Heritage Planner
Prior to joining D&A as a permanent staff member in
199B, Margot was involved in ecological research at
University of Guelph (1995-1997) and the reforestation
industry in northern Ontario (summers 19B9-1993).
CURRENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Municipal Natural Heritage Planning
City of Guelph Urban Forest Strategic Plan
Huron Natural Area Master Plan Update (Kitchener)
. Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes [ESL]
Background & Pilot Study (RM Waterloo)
. City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy [NHS]
City of Windsor Environmental Strategic Plan
Town of Oakville Environmental Strategic Plan
Town of Markham Tree Preservation By-law
. Creditview Wetland Conservation Plan
(Mississauga)
. Fort Erie Natural Areas Inventory & LSNAs
. Town of AncasterTree Protection By-law
Ecological Education
. Wetlands Conservation Workshop for Municipal
Planners & Partners (OMNR)
. Huron Natural Area Interpretive Signs (Kitchener)
. Terrestrial Ecology for Municipal EAs Workshop
(Hamilton Planning Staff)
. Grange Hill Ph 4 Trail Signs (Guelph)
. Guelph NHS Ph 1 Stakeholder Workshop & Forum
. Bathgate Drive Stewardship Leaflet (Guelph)
. High Park Management Plan, Tech. Input (Toronto)
Albion Mills Landowner Guide (Stoney Creek)
St-Lawrence Starch Woodlot (Misslssauga)
Lionhead Estate Landowner Guide (Brampton)
OMNR Extension Note on Woodland Plant Salvage
Cucumber Tree (Endangered Species) Assessments
Ecological Management & Monitoring Approaches
Zenon Natural Heritage Analysis (Oakville)
Natural Flows Paradigm Research Paper (OPG)
City of Kitchener Ecological Monitoring Framework
Hwy 401 Deer Monitoring Study (MTO)
Hanlon Ck State-of-the-Watershed Study (Guelph)
Oak Ridges Moraine OMB Terrestrial Ecology
Testimony Support (Richmond Hill)
. Hillborn Oak Woodland Stewardship (Cambridge)
. Ottawa Landfill Revegetation Options (Hamilton)
. Weiland River Restoration Strategies (Niagara)
I
I
..
...... ....'. ,...
'~~-;i
v:r
'---.::;J"
I
E.COLOGICAl CONSUL TlH(i & DESIGN
I
PROJECT EXPERIENCE cont'd
I
Habitat 8< Species Recovery Strategy Support
Eastern Prickly Pear Cactus Ecosystem Recovery
Eastern Fringed Orchid Recovery Strategy Review
Spotted Wintergreen Recovery Plan (OMNR)
I
Background Reviews 8< Ecological Research
Large Mammal Activity Near Roads (MTO)
Gosling Gardens Vision Concept & Background
Report (University of Guelph)
. Agro-economic Review of Applications for
Tallgrass Species in southern Ontario (OTPA)
. Dynamics of Floodplain Vegetation & Habitat
Restoration of Pulsed Systems
. Use of Soil Seed/Propagule Banks in Restoration
. Natural Heritage Approaches to Limestone Quarry
Rehabilitation
I
I
I
I
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
I
Dougan & Associates. 2005. Ecosvstem-based Recovery
Strateav for Eastern Prickiv Pear Cactus (Oountia
humifusa) - Lake Erie Sand Spit Savannas in Canada.
van der Heljden, M. G. A., J. N. Klironomos, M. Ursie, P.
Moutgoulis, R. Steeitwolf-Engel, T. Boller, A. Wiemken
and I. R. Sanders. 1999. "Samplina effect". a problem in
biodiversitv manipulation? Oikos 87(2): 408-41 O.
van der Heljden, M. G. A., J. N. Klironomos, M. Ursie, P.
Moutgoulis, R. Steeitwoif-Engel, T. Boller, A. Wiemken
and I. R. Sanders. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversitv
determines plant biodiversity. ecosvstem variabilitv
and productivity. Nature 396: 69-72.
Klironomos, J. N., M. Ursie, M. Rillig and M. F. Ailen.
1998. Inter-specific differences in the response of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to Artemesia tridenta
arown under elevated atmospheric CO'. New
Phytologist 138: 599-605.
Ursie, M. and R. L. Peterson. 1997. Moroholooical and
anatomical characterjzation of ectomycorrhizas and
ectendomycorrhizas on Pinus strobus L. seedlinas in a
southern Ontario nursery. Canadian Journal of Botany
75: 2057-2072.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Margot Ursie BA, MSc
Natural Heritage Planner
Ursie, M., R. L. Peterson and B. Husband. 1997. Relative
abundance of mvcorrhizal funai and freauencv of root
rot on Pinus strobus L. seedlings in a southern Ontario
nursery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 54-62.
SELECTED PRESENTATIONS
Ursie, M. 2005. Identifyina Environmentally Sensitive
Landscapes (ESLsl in the Reaion of Waterloo.
Progressive Greenspace & Natural Areas Planning
Session, Connections - OPPI Annual Conference, Sept.
28 - 30, Hamilton, ON.
Ursie, M. 2002. Scientific Communication in the
Ecoloaical Consultina Industry. Guest lecture, graduate
course, Botany Department, University of Guelph.
Ursic, M. and J. Dougan. 1999. Biodiversitv Recvclina:
Using Soil Propaauie Banks for Restoration. The Future
of Conservation, 6'" Annual A. D. LatorneH Conservation
Symposium, Oct. 18 - 20, Alliston, ON.
Dougan, J., M. Ursie and S. Crispin. 1999. Soil
propaauie banks - opportunities for biodiversitv
recvclina in temoerate restoration oroiects. Reweaving
the World, International Conference of the Society for
Ecological Restoration, Sept. 23 - 25, San Francisco, CA.
Ursie, K., M. Ursie and J. Dougan. 1998. A natural
heritaae approach to the rehabilitation of southern
Ontario's limestone auarries. Reclamation &
Restoration of Settled Landscapes, Proc. of 23" annual
meeting, CLRA & SER Ont., Sept. 27 - 30, Markham, ON.
Ursie, M. 1995. Leveis and tvpes of mycorrhizal
colonization on white pine (Pinus strobus L.l seedlinas
at a bare-root nursery in Ontario. CSPP/Cdn Botanical
Assoc. Conference, Univ. of Guelph, ON, June 1995.
Guest lecturer for Introductory Mycoiogy and Forest
Ecology, University of Guelph. 1993 -1995.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Society for Ecoiogical Restoration
. Nature Conservancy of Canada
. Waterloo-Wellington Wildflower Society
. Field Botanists of Ontario