Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 015 Drainage Works e e e e TIlE CORPORATION OF TIIE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE II. BY-LAW NO. 2006 - 015 BEING A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR A DRAINAGE WORKS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE IN THE COUNTY OF BRUCE WHEREAS the requisite number of owners have petitioned the council of the Municipality of Kincardine in the County of Bruce in accordance with the provisions of the Drainage Act., R.S.O. 1990, Chapter D.17, requesting that the following lands and roads be drained by a drainage works: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine has procured a report made by R.J. Bumside & Associates Limited and the report is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law; AND WHEREAS the estimated total cost of constructing the drainage works is $111,600.00; AND WHEREAS $NIL is the amount to be contributed by the municipality for construction of the drainage works; AND WHEREAS the Council for the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine is of the opinion that the drainage of the area is desirable; NOW THEREFORE the Council for The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine, under the Drainage Act, ENACTS as follows: 1. That the report dated November 2005 and attached hereto is hereby adopted and the drainage works as therein indicated and set forth is hereby authorized and shall be completed in accordance therewith. 2. (1) The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine may borrow on the credit of the Corporation the amount of $111 ,600.00 being the amount necessary for construction of the drainage works. (2) The Corporation may issue debentures for the amount borrowed less the total amount of, (a) grants received under Section 85 of the Act; (b) commuted payments made in respect of lands and roads assessed within the municipality; (c) money paid under subsection 61 (3) of the Act; .. ./2 e e e e Page 2 Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 By-law By-law No. 2006 - 015 (d) money assessed in and payable by another municipality, and such debentures shall be made payable within 5 years from the date of the debenture and shall bear interest at a rate not higher than the rate charged by the Ontario Municipal Improvement Corporation on the date of sale of such debenture. 3. A special equal annual rate sufficient to redeem the principal and interest on the debentures shall be levied upon the lands and roads as set forth in the schedule to be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected in each year for 5 years after the passing of this by-law. 4. For paying the amount of $NIL, being the amount assessed upon the lands and roads belonging to or controlled by the municipality, a special rate sufficient to pay the amount assessed plus interest thereon shall be levied upon the whole rateable property in the Municipality of Kincardine in each year for 5 years after the passing of this by-law to be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected. 5. All assessments of $50.00 or less are payable in the first year in which the assessment is imposed. 6. This by-law shall come into full force and effect upon its final passage. 7. This by-law may be cited as the "Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 By-Law". READ a FIRST and SECOND TIME this 1s1 day of February, 2006. PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED this 1 sl day of February, 2006. ~l~ Mayor' Q........... 'two. í1..,~ lerk READ a THIRD TIME and FINALLY PASSED this 19th DAY of April ,2006. ßJk-.t· Á Mayor . ~ 'tIM. ~aQ@ CI rk ¥ . . . æ BURNSiDE Revised Engineer's Report Bruce Municipal D~ittn No. 20 . 2005 Municipality of Kincardine Prepared by m"z:r' ~ "-, ~l D £) J...j ( / if.,. 'f ...t-'.-1..(_'V'ol...'t-/ .-¿-::~. ..1 \1 \ ;:- ~ ~~ Z¡;!J~.i I.: ~.ru<;r ~~.iI(-":.~(:'.': ~ j \if- vd',,","_ //'" V- i ftef~ ~1' dJ~YÍ4J; a tÚl L~,7 R. J. Burnside & Associates limited 449 Josephine Street PO Box 10 Wing ham ON NOG 2WO Canada + November 2005 File No: UW03 5666 Th. maleriat in [lis r!pVIl reflects best judgøment in ~ght of Ih8 irlonnatíøn avøilaþle lime rime of preparalÍOl\. Arty usa which a tfIj¡d P-1Y meta uf ¡lis report, or IIny rBliance on or decisiolls made based on it. ilre the reS Ollsiliitiu of such third parties, R. J. Burnside & Assotia1u ÜYlited accepts no resÞOnsibility for dillllages, if any. sufleÆd by any tbi«lparty as iI tesuJl of 1IecisiDns made or aClions based on thisrepon. · ,.t.~ ·t . · · .:.. '" --. < . . . Muniolpality of Kiuoardina 8Il108 Munioipal Drain No. 2D Nav""'er 2005 Table of Contents Table of Contents .... .... ... ....... ....... ... ....... ........................ ...... .......... .... ......... ....... .... ... ... ....... ...... ......i List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ ii Nomenclature.. ........... .... .,. '" ......... ....... .............. ... ..... ............. ..... .... ..... ...... ............. ........... .... ..... iii 1.0 FOREWORD .....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Authorization.................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives ......................................................................................................................1 1.3 Recommendations Summary .........................................................................................1 1.4 Acknowledgements ............ ................................ ...... .... .............. ........ ...... ..... ...... .... .... ...2 2.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 2.1 History..... ...................... ........................................ .... ...... ........ ........ ...... ...... .... ..... ...... .... 2 2.2 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................ 2 2.3 On-Site Meeting.............. ............................... ..... ...... .... ... ..... ............ ................... ..........2 2.4 Engineer's Report .................................. .................. ....... .... ...... ......... ...... ..... ...... ..... ... ... 3 2.5 Revised Engineer's Report.................... ....................... .............. ....... .......... ............ .......3 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED ..................................................................................3 3.1 Location...... ........... ............ ................................. .......... .............. .................... ...............3 3.2 Area.................. ....... .......................... ........ .............. ..................... ............. ........... .......... 3 3.3 Boundary .... ..... ............... ....................... ........ ...... .... .... ...... .... ..... ............... ... .................. 3 3.4 Soils ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.5 Topography.... ........................... ........... ....... ..... .... ........... ...... .......... ...... ..... ........... ..... ....4 3.6 Land Use ........... ............................................. ..... ..................... ... ....... .... ..... .... ..... ....... ...4 4.0 THE DRAINAGE ACT, RSO 1990 and THE AREA REQUIRING DRAINAGE ............4 5.0 DESIGN CRITERIA..........................................................................................................4 6.0 PROPOSED WORK.......................................................................................................... 5 6.1 General.............. .................. ............................. ...... ............ ....... ............................ ......... 5 6.2 Main Drain ...... ....... ................................. .............. ..... ........ .......... ................. .................5 6.2.1 Riprap at Outlet - Station 0+000............................................................................5 6.2.2 Junction Boxes for Hydro One Corridor - Stations 0+931 and 1+228..................5 6.3 Working Spaces and Access Routes ..............................................................................5 6.4 Change Orders... ............... .................................................. ................................... ......... 5 7 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERA TIONS............................. .........................................6 8.0 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................6 8.1 Appendix A - Allowances .............................................................................................6 8.1.1 General...................................................................................................................6 8.1.2 Section 29....... ....... ......... ...... ........ ........ ...... ................ .............. .............................. 6 8.1.3 Section 30............................................................................................................... 7 8.1.4 Section 3 I .............................................................. ................................................. 7 8.2 Appendix B - Cost Estimate..........................................................................................7 8.3 Appendices C and D - Assessments and Assessment Details....................................... 7 8.3.1 General..... ......... .... ............ ................................. ....................... ................... ..........7 8.3.2 Sections 22 and 23 ................................................................................................. 8 R.J. Burnside Be Associates Limited UWD3 5666 M.o¡cipolily of Kiocordio. Bruc. Municipal Drain No. 20 November20D5 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 8.3.3 S. Part Lot 16, Cone. 4 - Hydro One Networks Inc. ............................................11 MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................. ..............11 General.... ...... ............. ..... ....... ....... ..... ................................... ....... ...... ..... ... ...f.. ...... .... ..11 Cost Distribution..................................................................................... ...... ..............12 Future Underdrainage Connections .............................................................. ..............12 Working Space for Maintenance Purposes ................................................... ..............12 List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Allowances Cost Estimate Assessments Assessment Details Structure and Working Space Detail Sheets Drawings Dwg. No. UW03 5666-1 - Plan Dwg. No. UW03 5666-2 - Profile - Main Drain Dwg. No. UW03 5666-3 - Profile - Branch A R.J. Burnside & Associates limiled UW03 5666 ñ . ~ J -,' . . . J¡# S . . . Municipality 01 Kinca,dina Slues Municipal Drain No. 2D No,ember 2DD5 jjj Nomenclature ac - acre (0.4047 ha.) A & I - assemble and install CB - catchbasin CDT· concrete drain tile CSP - corrugated steel pipe C/W - complete with Diam. - diameter DICB - ditchin!et catchbasín D/S - downstream ea - each FL - fence Line FPPDT - filtered perforated plastic drainage tubing ITCB - flat top catchbasin H - horizontal ha - hectare (2.4 7 J ac) HDPE - heavy-duty polyethylene JB - junction box km - kilometre I.s. - lump sum m - metre mm - millimetre m2 - square metre m3 - cubic metre O/H - overhead 0/8 - offset PDT - plastic drainage tubing PL - property line PPDT· perforated plastic drainage tubing RCSP - riveted corrugated steel pipe ROW· right of way S & I - supply and install SPDT - solid plastic drainage tubing Sta. . station (chainage) SWI - surface water inlet SWRSP - smoothwall rigid sewer pipe SWWSP - smoothwall welded sleel pipe T - tonne (2205 pounds) UIO - underground U/S - upstream V - vertical R.J. Burnside iii Associates Limited UW03 5666 . . ....... . . . . . Municipality of Kincardine Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 Novamber 2005 >.-' 1.0 FOREWORD 1.1 Authorization . The preparation of an Engineer's Report for this proposed Municipal Drain was originally authorized in a letter dated August 8, 2003 from the Public Works Manager of the Municipality of Kincardine. This letter instructed R. J. Burnside & Associates Limited to act as drainage engineers with respect to a Petition for Drainage submitted under the Drainage Act requesting that an existing drain, serving an area consisting of part of Lot 16 and the Hydro One Networks corridor in Concession 4, as well as parts of Lots 16 and 17, and all of Lot 18 in Concession 3, all in the geographic Township of Bruce, be assurned as a Municipal Drain. An Engineer's Report was submitted for this project in late July 2004 but was referred back to Burnside for revision in mid August 2004. Accordingly, this report has been entitled a Revised Engineer's Report. 1.2 Objectives In compliance with the Drainage Act, this Report has the following objectives: . 1.2.1 in accordance with Section 31, to assume an existing drainage works as a Municipal Drain, consisting of a closed main drain passing southerly and southeasterly through Lot 16, Concession 4 from the existing Fourth ofBl1lce Municipal Drain, southeasterly across the Hydro One corridor, across the southwest corner of Lot 17. Concession 4 and through the north half of Lot 17, Concession 3 (all in the fonner Township ofBl1lce), on the basis that this existing drain provides adequate agricultural underdrainage outlet to the aforementioned lands, except for Lot 17, Concession 4, within the affected drainage area, and provides some capacity for surtàce water from the north and south parts of Lot 17 and some of Lot 18, all in Concession 3; and ful1her 1.2.2 in accordance with Section 31, to assume the existing tributary to the aforementioned drain, consisting of a closed drain extending easterly across the northeast quarter of Lot 17, Concession 3, to Lot 18 Concession 3, and providing outlet to most of Lot 18; and further 1.2.3 in accordance with Section 4, to authorize the construction of some improvements to the assumed ClosedMain Drain, specifically, the addition ofriprap to protect tl1e outlet at station 0+000 and the addition of junctions boxes on the downstream and upstream sides ofthe Hydro One Corridor, for inspection and cOlmection purposes. 1.3 Recommendations Summary . 1.3.1 It is recommended to assume the existing closed drainage works described above in subsection 1.2.1 and to designate it as Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20. Main Drain. 1.3.2 It is recommended to assume the existing tributary to the above-mentioned Drain. as described in Section 1.2.2, and to designate it as Branch A of Bruce Municipal Drain No.20. 1.3.3 It is recommended to construct improvements to proposed Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20, as described in Section 1.2.3. R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited UW03 5666 Municipality of Klnc.rdln. Bruc. Municipal Orain No. 20 November 2005 A Summary of the Assessments for this project is as follows: Privately Owned Agricultural Land Hydro One Networks (considered agricultmal) Total Estimated Assessments $ 108,192 $ 3.408 $ 111,600 1,4 Acknowledgements Burnside would like to acknowledge the assistance and co-operation of the landow involved with this project, as well as the Kincardine Public Works Committee, M staff. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 '. .... j . rs direct! y ger and 2.1 History During the late summer of2002, a new closed drainage system was installed at the ab e-mentioned location. Subsequently, the major stakeholders, namely Mike Voisin, Doug Walper, Mike Roppel and John Roppel, signed and submitted a Petition to the Municipality, in accordance ith Section 4 of the Drainage Act, requesting that this drainage system be assume as a Municipal 2.2 Existing Conditions Currently, the Municipal Drain consists of the following components. Main Drain Station 0+000 to 0+693 - 693 m x 600 mm COT at 0.075% Station 0+693 to 1+251- 558 m x 525 mm COT at 0.10% Station 1+251 to 1+635 - 384 m x 450 mm COT at 0.10% Station 1+635 to 1+827 - 192 m x 350 mm COT at 0.25% Station 1+827 to 1+897 - 70 m x 300 mm COT at 0.25% Branch "A" Station AO+OOO to AO+153 - 153 m x 300 mm PDT at approx. 1.0% Branch A connects to the Main Drain at approximately station 1 +606. . The enclosed Plan and Profiles provide further details regarding these Drains. 2.3 On·Site Meeting I. An on-site meeting regarding this proposal was held on September 24,2003. At thi~ meeting, the affected landowners explained the history of the existing drainage works. This n\eeting also provided an opportunity for the landowners and the engineer to discuss any improvements that should be implemented at the time that the drainage works is assumed as a Municipail Drain and how the present costs of the Drain had been distributed. R.J. Burnsid. & Associ.tes limited UW03 5666 i.1 . . . Municipality of Klncardina eruee MIIIieipa; Drain No. 20 November 2005 3 2.4 Engineer's Report An Engineer's Report was prepared and delivered to the Municipality on July 28. 2004. This Report was considered by Council and referred back to Burnside for revision. 2.5 Revised Engineer's Report As a result ofreconsidering the July 2004 Report, this Revised Engineer's Report has been prepared to address the concerns of the affected parties. Accordingly, this Report proposes the assumption of the existing drainage works as a new Municipal Drain, to be known as Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20, and includes recommendations for proposed improvements, a cost estimate, allowances, assessments and drawings. 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED 3.1 Location The Municipality of Kincardine is located in the southwest quarter of the County of Bmce, with Lake Huron as its west boundary. This proposed Municipal Drain is in the fonner Township of Bruce, which is now the north half of the Municipality. The site is approximately 6.5 kilometres east and 3 kilometres north of the Village of Tiverton. The outlet of the proposed Main Drain is tlle Fourth Concession Municipal Drain at the extreme northwest corner of Lot 16, Concession 4. The proposed Drain extends south-westerly from that point for 693 metres and then bends south- easterly, running across Lot 16 to the southeast corner, then through the southwest corner of Lot 17, Concession 4, and into and through the north half of Lot 17, Concession 3. Please see the enclosed Plan for further details. 3.2 Area TIle entire watershed is approximately 107.4 hectares in area and consists of approximately 97.4 hectares of privately owned agricultural land, of which I hectare is wooded, and approximately 10.0 hectares of the Hydro One transmission corridor. TIlese lands can be seen on the enclosed Plan. 3.3 Boundary The exterior watershed boundary and the interior watershed boundary for Branch A are indicated on the Plan and have been confirmed as part of the work undertaken in preparing this Report. Tile drainage plans from Tait Bros. Contracting Ltd. were examined and field investigations were undertaken to establish these boundaries. R.J. Burnside & Associates Umíted UW03 5666 Municipality of Kincardine Bruce Municipal Drain No. 2D November 2005 4 - '. , - . , 3.4 Soils The Bruce County Soils Map indicates that the soil types in this watershed are Ben'i n Sandv Loam and Burford Loam, plus a small area of Elderslie Silt Loam. The Berrien San y Loan; and . Elderslie Silt Loam are mainly found in the Concession 3 portion of the watershed a d both have imperfect natural drainage. Theses soils have a Class 2 rating for agricultural capab ity, with "soil characteristics" as the limitation, indicating moderate limitations that restrict II range of crops or require moderate conservation practices. Most ofllle Burford Loam is fou in the Concession 4 part of the watershed and has good natlll'lÙ drainage, with an agricult capability rating of Class I, and no significant limitations in use for crop production. 3.5 Topography The Bruce County Soils Map. the Ontario Base Mapping and site observations indic te that all areas within the watershed are gently to moderately sloping with respect to topograp y; therefore, none of the land within the drainage area is too steep to restrict agricultural operatio s. 3.6 Land Use All of the privately owned land within tllis watershed is used for agricultural pllrpOS s. The land owned by Hydro One within this drainage area is the transmission corridor fr0111 the ruce . Nuclear Power Development; however, virtually all of this land is used for agricllltu 'al purposes by the neighbouring (petitioning) property owners. 4.0 THE DRAINAGE ACT. RSO 1990 and THE AREA REQUIRING DRAINAGE This Report is being prepared in accordance with Section 4 of the Drainage Act, as Petition was received by Municipal Council regarding this drainage situation. The Petition g nerally describes Lot] 6, Concession 4, the north part of Lot] 6 and the n011h and southeast parts of Lot 17, Concession 3, and all of Lot 18, Concession 3, as the area requiring drainage. Burnside concurs with this description of the area requiring drainage and, since the majority of owners of this area signed the Petition, the Petition is declared adequate and this project can pr . ceed under Section 4(I)(a) of the Act. 5.0 DESIGN CRITERIA The applicable sections of the "Design and Construction Guidelines for Work Under the Drainage Act", as prepared by the Government of Ontario, and the applicable sectiOl s of the "Drainage Guide for Ontario", as published by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture d Food, have been used to analyse the capacity of this Municipal Drain. This analysis reveal d that the . average capacity of this drain relates to a drainage coefficient of 16.6 millimetres (0. 5 inches) in 24 hours for the cleared. worked, agricultural land within the watershed. This drain e coefficient is within the range permitted by the Ministry guidelines. R.J. Bwnside & Associ,tes limiled UW03 5666 - .i ..., . . . . Municipality of Kincardine eruce Municipal Orain No. 20 Novomber 2005 5 6.0 PROPOSED WORK 6.1 General In accordance with Section 8 (I) (a) of the Drainage Act, the Plan and Profiles of the existing and proposed works are included in Appendix F of this Report. The Structure and Working Space Details can be found in Appendix E. An amount of$12,546, plus GST and interest, is outstanding to the contractor who installed this Drain. Accordingly, upon issuance of a proper invoice to the Municipality of Kincardine and approval by the engineer, that amount will be paid to Tait Bros. Contracting Ltd. and charged as an expense to this project. 6.2 Main Drain 6.2.1 Riprap at Outlet· Station 0+000 It is proposed to install approximately 30 m2 of riprap at the outlet of the tile drain at Station 0+000 to prevent erosion of the bank of the Fourth of Bruce Municipal Drain. 6.2.2 Junction Boxes for Hydro One Corridor - Stations 0+931 and 1+228 At the request of Hydro One, it is proposed to install junction boxes on both the upstream and downstream sides of the Hydro corridor. The downstream junction box at Station 0+931 will be available for inspection and for the connection of any future underdrainage from the east half of Lot 16, Concession 4. The upstream junction box at Station 1 +228 will be available for inspection and for the connection of any underdrainage tiles from the north part of Lots 16 and 17, Concession 3. These structures must be 900 mm by 1200 mm in size to accommodate the existing 525 mm diameter tile and their cost will be assessed entirely to Hydro One. 6.3 Working Spaces and Access Routes The working space widths being provided to the Contractor to undertake the proposed upgrades are described on the detail sheet entitled "Working Space" included in Appendix E. Access to the working space is to be negotiated by the contractor with the engineer prior to the commencement of construction. Appropriate allowances have been provided to the various properties in this regard. Working space for maintenance purposes is described in Section 9 of this Report. 6.4 Change Orders . If unforeseen circumstances are encountered after the adoption of this Report. the engineer may issue Change Orders as required to have the works properly constructed. R.J. Burnside & Associates limited UWD3 5666 Municipality of Kincardine Bruce NUlicipal Drain No. 20 N......er 2005 6 .. ... 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Since all of the proposed work will be undertaken on the existing closed tile Drain a d on cleared agricultural land, and since riprap will be placed at the outlet of the tile drain, it is n t anticipated . that this project will create any significant adverse effects. The Municipality of Kincardine did notify the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authori (SVCA) about this project; however, since no response was received and the Drain has alrea been constructed, is as sun led that the SVCA has no interest in the project. 8.0 APPENDICES Four of the appendices to this Report, namely Appendix A - Allowances, Appendix - Cost Estimate, Appendix C - Assessments, and Appendix D - Assessment Details are at! ched hereto and are described in the following sub-sections. 8.1 Appendix A - Allowances 8. 1.1 General In accordance with Section 8 (I) (d) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix provides a eakdowl1 of the allowances provided under Sections 29,30 and 31 of the Act. Allowances will b deducted fÌ'om total assessments, in accordance with Section 62(3) of the Act. The methods 0 calculating . the areas used for determining these alloWànces are described in the following sectio sand, where applicable, the allowance calculations under each Section of tlle Act can be se n in Appendix A. 8.1.2 Section 29 The Act states "The engineer in the report shall estimate and allow in money to the ( wner (if any land that it is necessary to use, (a) for the construction or improvement of a drainage works; (b)/or the disposal of material removed from drainage works; (c) as a site for a pumping station to be used in connection with a drainage arks; or (d) as a means of access to any such pumping station, if, in the opinion of the engineer, such right of way is sufficient for the purposes of the drainage works, the val e of any such land or the damages, if any, thereto, and shall include such sums in the stimates of the cost of the construction, improvement, repair or maintenance of the drai age work\-. R.s.a. 1990, s. 29." I The allowances for right-of-way given have been calculated using a base value of$6 200 per hectare of workable land and have been provided to the properties on which the Drai 1 is constructed. On the basis that this land can still be used for agricultural purposes, 01 e third of tins value was applied to a 10 metre wide right of way along the full length of the M in Drain and Branch. . R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited UW03 5666 J,# ~-~ . . . Municipolity ., Kin.ardina Bruce Municipal Orain No. 20 Novamber 2005 7 8.1.3 Section 30 The Act states "The engineer shall determine the amount to be paid to persons entitled thereto for damage, if any, to ornamental trees, lawns, fences, lands and crops occasioned by the disposal of material removed.from a drainage works and shall include such sums in the estimates of the cost of the construction, improvement, repair or maintenance of the drainage works. R.s.a. 1990, c. D.17, s. 30." The allowances for damage to lands and crops have been calculated using a base value of $1,235.50 per hectare of workable land. This assumes a complete loss ofthe crop for the year of construction for the entire width of the working space required for the upgrades. The allowances for damage to the Hydro One Networks Inc. properties have been given to adjacent lands to the north; namely, J.P. Roppel, S. Voisin & M.l Voisin, on the basis that it will be the crops of these landowners that will be damaged during the construction ofthe proposed upgrades. 8.1.4 Section 31 The Act states "Where an existing drain that was not constructed on requisition or petition under this Act or any predecessor of this Act is incorporated in whole or in part in a drainage works, the engineer in the report shall estimate and allow in money to the owner of such drain or part the value to the drainage works of such drain or part and shall include such sum in the estimates of the cost of the construction, improvement, repair or maintenance qlthe drainage works. R.S.a. 1990, c. D.1?, s. 31." Allowances under this Section have been provided to the subject properties in the amount that those properties have paid toward the existing tile drain that is being assumed. 8.2 Appendix B - Cost Estimate In accordance with Section 8(b) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix provides a breakdown of the total estimated cost of $111 ,600 for this proposed project, which includes all materials, construction, administration, and allowances. 8.3 Appendices C and D - Assessments ilnd Assessment Details 8.3.1 General In accordance with Section 8(c) of the Drainage Act, this Appendix is the distribution of the total estimated cost over the lands involved. These assessments are made in accordance with Sections 22, and 23 of the Act. All affected private lands that are agricultural within the meaning of the Act should be eligible for any provincial grants that may be available through the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. R.J. eum.ide & Ass.ciate. Limited UW03 5666 Municipality .1 Kinca,dine Bruce Municipal Orain No. 20· No......' 2005 8' " " 8.3.2 Sections 22 and 23 Section 22 of the Act states "Lands, roads, buildings, utilities or other structures at are . increased in value or are more easily maintained as a result o/the construction, i ¡provement. maintenance or repair a/a drainage works may be àssessedfor bene/ìt. R.S.o. 1 0, c. D.l?, s. 22." Section 23 of the Act states "(1) Lands and roads that use a drainage works as an outlet, or for which when the drainage works is constructed or improved, an improved outlet is provide either directly or indirectly through the medium of any other drainage works or of a swa e, ravine, creek or watercourse, may be assessedfor outlet liability. (2) If, .from any land or road, water is artificially caused by any mean:; to. low upon and injure any other land or road, the land or road from which the water is c sed to.flow may be assessed for injuring liability with respect to a drainage works to elieve the injury so caused to such other land or road. (3) The assessment for outlet liability and injuring liability provided for i1/ subsections (1) and (2) shall be based upon the volume and rate of .flow of the water (I tijicially caused to flow upon the injured land or road or into the drainage work~. om the larub; and roads liable for such assessments. (4) The owners of the lands and roads made liable to assessment only un er subsection . (1) or (2) shall neither countfor nor against the Petition required by sect on 4 unless within the area therein described. R.S.O. 1990, c. D.I?, s. 23." The costs have been assessed to all affected lands and roads, in accordance with le appropriate Sections of the Act, following the "Todgham Method". This is a method of dete mining assessments that is generally accepted by the drainage profession as being fair an equitable. TIle basics of this method are explained here the detailed Sectional Assessment Wor! sheets for this Drain are included in Appendix D. Any interested party can obtain all of the ass ssment details upon request. I a) Equivalent Areas - In order to conform to Section 23(3) of the Act, alllandp, within the drainage area had an "equivalent area factor" applied to them. This factor is estllblished for each parcel of land within the drainage area and is dependent on the particular charac eristics of that land, the prime characteristics being land use and topography. In this way "...th volume and rate offlow of water artificially caused to flow...into the drainage works..." is establi hed on a relative basis for "...the lands and roads liable for such assessments." The equiv lent area factors that have been used for this Drain are; cleared, worked agricultural land 1.0 and ush 0.5. Using this information, a Summary of Equivalent Areas spreadsheet is prepared for th entire drainage . area and each sub-drainage area. b) Sections of the Drain - Based on sub-drainage areas and property lines, th subject Drain or Drains are divided into various Sections for assessment purposes, normally wit! Section I being at the downstream end. TIlese Sections are shown on Dwg. UW03 5666-SECT enclosed here in Appendix D. The equivalent areas within and upstream of each Section are als determined. c) Costs for Each Section - The total project cost for each Section is calculat d and includes R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited UW03 5855 :i' '.1 , . . . Municipality of Kincardine eruce Mtmicipal Orain No. 20 November 2005 9 all costs, such as; materials, construction, allowances, and administration. The total of these sectional costs must equal the total project cost including any special assessments made in accordance with Sections 24 and 26 of the Act. The section costs for this project are shoWIl in the Final Section Costs table included in Appendix D. d) Benefit Assessment - To completely understand the assessment process, the reader must be aware of the definition of "benefit" contained in the Act. Standard practice is to make an assessment for benefit only to those properties upon which the work is actually done or to the properties adjacent to where the work is actually done, when the drain is located on or near the boundary between one or more properties. e) Outlet Liability Assessment - An understanding of "outlet liability", as defined in the Act, is also required to comprehend the assessment process. Standard practice is to make an assessment for outlet liability to any and all lands and roads that are within the drainage area since, in some manner, water from those lands will use all or part of the Drain as an outlet. 1) Direct Outlet Assessment - This term is used to describe the assessment for outlet made to those lands within each section of the Drain that outlet directly into that section. For example. If there are 15 equivalent hectares within the sub-drainage area of Section 3 of the Drain, these 15 equivalent hectares gain direct outlet to the Drain somewhere within the length of Section 3 and shall be assessed for the outlet obtained within that section. This assessment is not separately defined in the Act and is usually included with benefit when assessments are calculated. g) Variation of Assessments throughout the length of the Drain - When engineers calculate assessments, they must decide (I) what portion of the cost of each section will be assessed as benefit and direct outlet to the land upon which the Drain is being constructed and (2) what portion will be assessed as outlet to the lands and roads upstreanl of that section. It is generally accepted that the benefit and direct outlet portion of a dOWIlstream section is comparatively low, since most of the capacity of the Drain is being provided as outlet for the upstream lands. Conversely then, the benefit and direct outlet portion of an upstream section is normally high, since most of the capacity there is being provided for tlle land upon which the Drain is being constructed. Therefore, normally, for a dOWIlstream section of the Drain, the portion of the cost assessed as benefit and direct outlet is low and the portion assessed as outlet is high; while, for an upstream section ofthe Drain, the portion of the cost assessed as benefit and direct outlet is high, and the portion assessed as outlet is low. Taken to the extreme, that is to the last upstreanl property in the drainage area, all of the cost of any work done on that property would be assessed as benefit and direct outlet, since there are no other lands upstream thereofthat can be assessed for outlet. h) Actual Assessment Calculations for a Typical Section of the Drain - The process used for the calculation of the assessments for each section of the Drain is generally the same. A brief description of this process follows. Reference to the "Sectional Assessment Worksheets" included in Appendix D should assist the reader with this description. 1) CostlEq. Ua. from DIS - This figure is the cumulative outlet assessment per equivalent hectare that is brought forward from the previous section (where applicable). 2) Total Section Cost - This is the total sectional cost, as previously explained. 3) Specific Costs - These are costs for specific items that are considered to apply (in whole or in part) only to a particular property or road and not to all the lands within the drainage area. These costs can be Section 24 Assessments, Section 26 Assessments. or "specific" benefit assessments. These specific assessments are then posted to the particular property or R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited UW03 5666 MunicipalilY of Kincardine Bruce MIIIicipal Orain No. 20 November 2005 road in the Summary Table and the total of them is deducted from the Total S ction Cost to leave the "Remainder to Assess". 4) Normal Outlet ~ At this point in the process, the engineer uses profess~' 0 'al judgment and experience to establish the percentage of this "Remainder to Assess" that hould be assessed as Normal Outlet to the lands and roads upstream of this section. balance will then be the amount to be assessed as Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet to the ands and roads in this section. i 5) Equivalent Area Drained - This is the equivalent area that is upstream 0 the subject section of the Drain. The portion of the cost that has been detennined to be sessed as outlet for this section is then divided by this equivalent area. This results in the am nt per equivalent hectare that is to be assessed as outlet to those upstream lands and oads for this section. This amount is then transferred to the "Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. car ed VIS" item at the bottom of the worksheet. 6) Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet - This figure is the amount remaining to be assessed after subtracting the outlet assessment amount. 7) Direct Outlet - At this stage, the engineer uses professional judgment an~ experience to establish the length of this section of the Drain that is used by each parcel of I nd within the section. The calculation, as shown on the worksheet, is then made to determi e the "Direct Outlet" assessment for each on these parcels. These "Direct Outlet" assessm ts are then transferred to the Summary Table. The "Total of Direct Outlet" amount is th n subtracted from the previous sub-total to provide the amount "Remaining for Normal Be efit". 8) Remaining for Normal Benefit - This figure is the Normal Benefit asse ment levied against the lands within this section. It is then transferred to the appropriate I cation in the Summary Table. 9) Summary Table - In Sectiøn - This is the listing of the parcels of land ithin this section ofthe Drain. The assessments determined for each of these parcels ar posted in this table. 10) Summary Table - VIS of Section - This is where the properties that us only this section of the Drain, and those downstream, are listed and the outlet assessm ts applicable to each are posted. These assessments are calculated by multiplying the equi alent area of each by the Cumulative Cost/Eq. Ha. carried VIS. 11) Sub - Total- This is the total of the assessments levied within this secf n of the Drain 12) Cumulative Total- This is the total of all the assessments levied to thi point on the Drain. i) Initial Reconciliation of Total Assessments - When all sectional assessmen s have been completed, they are reconciled and the totals established per property. j) Final Fairness Test - The engineer then reviews the reconciled totals from a ove, comparing each one with all of the others, to ensure that, in his opinion, each pro erty has been dealt with fairly as compared with every other property. If any unfairness appear, this is adjusted out until the engineer is satisfied that all assessments are fair and in bal ce, having in mind the actual conditions in the field. k) Schedule of Assessments - When the engineer is satisfied with the final ass sments. the schedule of assessments is prepared. This is included in Appendix C of this Rep rt. R.J. Burnside & Associates Ü/nited UW03 5556 10 ' 't-~ <' . . . ;,. .~.t. . . . Muni.ipalily 0' Kin...dine Bruce MII1~ipal Orain No. 20 November 2005 11 8.3.3 S. Part lot 16. Cone. 4· Hydro One Networks Inc. At the time of the initial site meeting, an arrangement was made between Mr. Rick Poppe of Hydro One and the surrounding agricultural landowners. Mr. Poppe indicated that Hydro One does not require the drainage works; however, since the closed drain tile crosses the Hydro One transmission line corridor, he would like to see structures installed upstream and downstream of the corridor for inspection purposes. While the surrounding agricultural landowners require the drainage work to improve their crop production, they do not see the need to install junction boxes. Accordingly, Mr. Poppe offered that Hydro One would pay the full price of the junction boxes, provided that Hydro One does not have to pay toward the capital cost of the existing drainage works. The landowners agreed to this arrangement. Accordingly, the junction boxes have been specifically assessed to Hydro One Networks Inc. in accordance with Section 22 of The Drainage Act; however, the benefit and outlet assessments that would normally have been assessed to Hydro One in accordance with Sections 22 and 23 for the west part of Lot 16, Concession 4 have been assessed to the property owned by J.P. Roppel. Similarly, the assessments that would normally have been assessed to Hydro One for the west part of the east half of Lot 16, Concession 4 have been assessed to the property owned by S. Voisin and the assessments that would normally have been assessed to Hydro One for the east part of the east half of Lot 16, Concession 4 have been assessed to the property owned by MJ. Voisin. ll1ese assessments were directed to the properties immediately north of the Hydro One lands on the basis that the adjacent agricultural property owners have long term lease agreements with Hydro One to use the Hydro land for agricultural purposes and it is those landowner who benefit from the drainage works on the Hydro One property. However. Hydro One will be responsible for any future Drain maintenance costs, in accordance witl1 this Report and the Act. 9.0 MAINTENANCE 9.1 General While the Municipality of Kincardine will be responsible for the maintenance of this Drain after construction is complete, the sections of the Drainage Act dealing with obstruction of, damage or injury to, and pollution of a Municipal Drain, namely Sections 80, 82. and 83 respectively. are brought to the attention of all of the landowners. As can be seen from these sections, the landowners and the Municipality have responsibilities to ensure that a Municipal Drain is properly maintained and not abused. Proper maintenance of the proposed works described here will be necessary to ensure that all parts continue to function properly. This maintenance should include regular inspections and necessary work along the entire length of the Drain and should ensure that all structures and tiles remain unobstructed by debris or sediment and are cleaned on a . regular basis. As well, any areas of washout, settlement, or erosion should be attended to immediately. Landowners involved with this Drain should make regular inspections of the portion on their property and immediately report any problems to the Municipality so that the Drainage Superintendent can take proper action. R.J. Burnside & Associ,les limited UW03 5666 Municipality of Kincardin. Braea Mœicipal Drain No. 20 No.ambør 2005 12' 'r .;, 9.2 Cost Distribution Future maintenance costs incurred on this new Municipal Drain shall be distribut d in . accordance with the terms of the Drainage Act using the Maintenance Assessm nt Schedule contained in Appendix C, until such time as they are varied in accordance with he Act. 9.3 Future Underdrainage Connections With the exception of the southernmost part of the east half of Lot 16, Concessio 4 and the northernmost part of Lot 16, Concession 3, all of the affected land in the Bruce unicipal Drain No. 20 watershed is already systematically underdrained into the existing draina works. After construction, new private tile drains shall not be connected directly to the M nicipal Drain tile. Any such future counections to the Municipal Drain tile must be made at th approved locations, such as the junction boxes. Specifically, any future underdrainage fro ' the southernmost part of the east half of Lot 16, Concession 4 shall connect to the ne junction box being installed at Station 0+931 and any future underdrainage from the northe ost part of Lot 16, Concession 3 shall counect to the new jtIDction box being installed at Station 1 +228. 9.4 Working Space for Maintenance Purposes The Working Space for maintenance purposes shall be a ten metre (10 m) width ong the full . length of this Main Drain and Branch A. Access to the is Working Space shall n rmally be from a public road allowance, the Hydro One access lane, or other farm lane(s). Respectfully submitted, R. J. Burnside & Associates Limited ¿~~. . R.J. Burnsid. & Associ'I" limiled UW03 5BBS ;., .-;r fIt BURNSiDE · Appendix A Allowances · · '-- ~ · · · ;. .t · · · - A1 . APPENDIX A - ALLOWANCES FOR: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 . 2005 DATE: November 2005 MUNICIPALITY: Kincardine PROJECT: UW03 5666 Drain Lot Right of Way Damages Already & Owner (Sect.29) (Sect.30) Constructed Totals Cone. (Sect31 ) MAIN DRAIN W Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 J.P. Roppel 1.610 19 9,000 10.628 E Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 S. Voisin 153 95 7.000 7,248 S Pt. Lol 16. Cone. 4 Hydro One Networks Inc. 692 20 . 712 S Pt. Let 17, Cone. 4 Hydro One Networks Inc. 83 · - 83 N PI. Lol 17, Cone. 3 M.B. Roppel 1,385 6 19.000 20,391 N PI. Lot 17, Cone. 3 D.N. Walper · · 2.640 2.640 leI 18, Cone. 3 D.N. Walper · · 18,060 18,060 ALLOWANCES MAIN DRAIN $ 3,922 $ 140 $ 55,700 $ 59,762 BRANCH "A" N Pt. Lot 17, Cone. 3 M.B. Roppel 316 · . 316 leI 18, Cone. 3 D.N. Walper · · 2,664 2,664 ALLOWANCES BRANCH "A" $ 316 $ · $ 2,664 $ 2,980 TOTAL ALLOWANCES $ 4,238 $ 140 $ 58,364 $ 62,742 .' -A2- 'r .:;, SECTION 29 - RIGHT FWAY ALLOWANCE CALCULATI NS land Value $ I heel are 6.200,00 $/ acre 2. 09.11 Soction by section Section Owner Desc'n St.. Width Fetor m) MAIN DRAIN M1 J.P. Roppel W PI. Lol 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain Ihrough field 0 150 150 10 .33 310 310 M2 J.P. Rappel W PI. Lol 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain Ihrough lield 150 693 543 10 .33 1.122 1.122 M3 J.P. Rappel W PI. LOI 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain through field 693 779 86 10 .33 178 M3 Hydro One Networks Inc. S PI. Lol 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain Ihrough field 779 931 152 10 1.33 314 492 M4 S. Voisin E PI. Lot 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain Ihrough field 931 1005 74 10 .33 153 M4 Hydro One Nelworks Inc. S PI. Lol 16, Cone. 4 Closed drain Ihrough field 1005 1188 183 10 .33 378 M4 Hydro One Nelworks Inc. S PI. LOI 17, Cone. 4 . Closed drain Ihrough field 1188 1228 40 10 LU 83 614 M5 M.B. Rappel N 1/2 Lot 17, Cone. 3 Closed drain through field 1228 1635 407 10 0.33 841 841 M6 M.B. Rappel N 1/2 Lot 17, Cone. 3 Closed drain Ihrough tield 1635 1898 263 10 0.33 543 543 MAIN DRAIN T TAL $ 3,922 BRANCH A A1 M.B. Roppel N 1/2 LOI 17. Cone. 3 Ciosed drain through tìeld 0 153 153 10 0.33 316 316 BRANCH A T TAL$ 316 4,238 . . ,L .A3. SECTION 30 - DAMAGE ALLOWANCE CALCULA nONS Damages S I hectare 1,235.50 $/acre 500.00 Section by section · Section Owner Desc'n SIn. SIn. Length Width Factor Allow Section (m) (m) (m) (m) (5) Sub-Iolnl Main Drain Ml J.P. Roppel W PI. Lot 16, Cone. 4 Work space around existing outlet pipe. 0+000 10 10 1.0 12 12 M4 J.P. Ruppel W PI. Lot 16, Cone. 4 Work space around new junction box at 0+931. ()+931 5 10 1.0 6 M4 S. Voisin E PI. Lot 16, Cone. 4 Access to location of new junction box. at 0+931. ()+931 180 4 1.0 89 Work space around new junction box at 0+931. ()+931 5 10 1.0 6 M4 Hydro One Networks Inc. S Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 Useoflaneway. ()+931 10 III M5 M.B. Ruppel N 1/2 Lot 17, Cone. 3 Work space around new junction box at 1+228. 1+228 10 5 1.0 6 M5 Hydro One Networks Inc. S PI. LOI 16, Cone. 4 Use oflaneway. 1+228 10 16 · TOTALS 140 · -A4 - '- , SECTION 31 - EXISTING DRAIN ALLOW ANC S (Based on amounts paid to date) I Owner Desc'n Allow ($) · Main Drain J.P. Roppel W Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 9,000 S. Voisin E Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 7,000 M.B. Roppel N 1/2 Lot 17, Cone. 3 19,000 D.N. Walper S 1/2 Lot 17, Conc. 3 2,640 D.N. Walper Lot 18, Conc. 3 18,060 MAIN DRAIN TOT L $ 55,700 Branch A D.N. Walper Lot 18, Conc. 3 2,664 · BRANCH A TOT L $ 2,664 TOT L $ 58,364 · ; .., (j BURNSiDE · Appendix B Cost Estimate · · ..... i. · · · " .ç · · · . B1 . APPENDIX 8 - COST ESTIMATE Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 MUNICIPALITY: Kincardine MAIN DRAIN - OPEN PORTION 30 m2 of riprap at exisling main drain outlel pipe 2 900 x 1200 mm junction boxes complele with flat grates and connections Unpaid balance to Taft Bros. Contracting Ltd. TOTAL ESTIMATED MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - Engineering - Survey, drafting, design,cost eslimalion, allowance calculalions, assessmenl calculations. preparalion of final report · Attendance at Meetings - Report Copying/Binding · Letting of Conlract - Conlract Adminislration - Allowances · Inleresl · Contigency TOTAL ESTIMATED ADMINISTRATION DATE: November200S PROJECT: UW03 5666 900 2,400 12,546 $ 15,846 $ 23,000 1,000 1.000 500 2.000 62,742 1.100 4,412 $ 9S,764 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 111,600 .... .. · · · ;, (l1 BURNSiDE '. Appendix C Assessments . . ~;, . . . ¡ 3c ·CI· APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENTS Main Drain & Branch A FOR: Bruce Municipal Drain Ne. 20 . 2005 DATE: November 200S MUNICIPAUTY: Kincardine PROJECT: UW03 5666 . Affeeted Benefit Outlet Lot & Cone. OwIÍer Roll No. Area Assess't Asseu't Total (Ha.) (Secl22) (Sect.23) Main Drain Wpt 16. Cone 4 J.P. Roppel 1·205 11.11 11,642 5,620 17.262 E PI 16, Cone 4 S. Voisin 1-206 5.65 4,206 2,659 6.864 E PI 16, Cone 4 M.J. Voisin 1-207 4.47 4,373 2.679 7,052 S PI 16. Con<: 4 Hydro One Networks I"e. 1-173-10 10,02 1.704 1,704 S PI 17. Con<: 4 Hydro One Networks Ine. 1·173-10 0,00 1.704 1,704 16, Cone 3 H. & D. Brown '-151 7.28 4,710 4,710 N Pt 17, Cone 3 M.B. Roppel 1~153 18.33 19,839 13,100 32.939 S Pt 17. Cone 3 D.N. Welper 1-154 5.72 4.886 4,886 18. Cone 3 D.N. Walper 1-155 39.13 29,432 29,432 TOTAL MAIN DRAIN = 101.71 $ 43,468 $ 63,086 $ 106,554 Branch A N PI 17. Cone 3 M.B, RoppeI 1-153 1.60 651 1De 757 18, Cone 3 D.N. Welper 1-155 32.28 4.289 4.289 TOTAL BRANCH A = 33.88 S 651 $ 4,395 $ 5,046 . TOTAL MAIN DRAIN & BRANCH A = $ 44,119 $ 67,481 $ 111,600 Notes: (1) Assessment to Hydro One Networks Inc. #1 (less specific assessment) transferred to Wpt Lot 16. Cone 4 (J.P. Rappel) (2) Assessment to Hydro One Networks Ine.. #2 (less specific assessment) transferred to E Pt lot 16, Cone 4 (S. Voisin) (3) Assessment to Hydro One NeiYprks Ine. #3 (less specific assessment) transferred to E Pt Lot 16. Cone 4 (M.J. Voisin) (4) All lands are considered as "agriculturar'. within the meaning of the Drainage Act. . ~ ., . . . . . J .. -C2 - APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENTS Maintenance Assessment Schedule - Main Drain & Branch A FOR: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 DATE: November 2005 . MUNICIPALITY: Kincard.ine PROJECT: UW03 5666 Affected % Lot & Cone. Owner Roll No. Area Maintenance (Ha.) Assessment Main Drain W PI 16, Cone 4 J.P. Roppel 1-205 11.11 4.82 E PI 16, Cone 4 S. Voisin 1-206 5.65 2.88 E PI 16. Cone 4 M.J. Voisin 1·207 4.47 1.88 S PI 16, Cone 4 Hydro One Networks Ine. 1·173·10 10.02 7.79 16, Cone 3 H. & D. Brown 1·151 7.28 7.47 N Pt 17, Cone 3 M.B. Roppel 1-153 18.33 20.77 S PI 17, Cone 3 D.N. Walper 1-154 5.72 7.74 18, Cone 3 D.N. Walper 1·155 39.13 46.65 TOTAl MAIN DRAIN = 101.71 100.00 . Branch A N pt 17, Cone 3 M.B. Roppel 1-153 1.60 2.42 18, Cone 3 D.N. Walper 1·155 32.28 97.58 TOTAL BRANCH A = 33.88 100.00 . , \ . . . l ~ (b BURNSiDE . Appendix D Assessment Details . . , . , . . . l ,- . <I '$ . (j)Ø&(3)~ HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC. PROPERTY "-'ð 7, . A7~ , ~ '. ~~ . ...... UW03 5666 SECT "'" 1:10.000 ... NOVEMBER 2005 "1'0, -"'/1 "~ - .'" SECTIONAL PLAN BRUCE MUNICIPAL DRAIN NO. 20 MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE A G1 () '8 I I ! , + + + + + . . + + + + + + II " ..1__·.I1I..'t,_......:o.,..:,.....,."":....,,, _~.).$! ·,"'..,(~·t¡,.,-...·_...··....-..···- @ BURNSiDE , . , . . . . . , , . . . . . . D1 . Final Section Cosls Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 . 2005 Date: November 2005 Municipality: Kincardine ProJect: UW03 5666 Drain Proposed Upgrades and Section Already OutstandTna Batance to Talt Bros. Allowances Sub-Total Admin. TOTALS Constructed Drain Sb'uctures Culverts (Sects. 29 & 30) . ¡Sect. 31\ MAlNDRAtN M1 5.690 2.123 · · 322 8,135 3.417 11.552 (0+000 to 0+150) M2 19.592 4.211 · · 1,122 24.926 10.471 35.397 (0+150 to 0+693) M3 6.913 1.466 · · 492 6.691 3.735 12.626 (0+693 to 0+931) M4 8.627 1.854 1.200 · 728 12.406 5.211 17,616 (0+931 to 1+228) M5 10.028 2.155 1,200 · 857 14.240 5.982 20.222 (1+228 to 1+635) M6 4.650 1.043 · · 543 6.436 2.704 9,140 (1+635 to 1+698) SUBTOTALS 55.700 12.873 2.400 · 4,062 75.034 31.519 106.554 BRANCH "A" A1 2._ 573 · · 316 3.553 1,493 5.046 IAO+OOO to AO+153) SUBTOTALS 2._ 573 · · 316 3.553 1.493 5.046 TOTALS $ 5&,3&4 $ 13,446 $ 2,400 $ · $ 4,378 $ 18.588 $ 33,012 $ 111,600 -02· MuniciDal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: UW03 5666 Section Number = M1 Project Neme : Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 [11 CostlEq. Ha. from D/S = 0.00 [2] Tolal Section Cosl = $ 11,552 Dale: November 2005 [3] Specific Cosls Total S ecifi Costs = Remainder to Assess = 11,552 [4] Normal OulJe! 100 % Normal Benefrt and Direcl OuUel 0% [51 Equlv'1 Area Drained = 102.81 Ha. @ $112.36 per Eq. Ha. for Normal OuUel = 11,552 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direc Outlel = [71 Direct Outlel Total of Dir OuUet = [6] Remaining for Normal enefit= - SUMMARY TABLE I LOT I OWNER EO. AREAl ACTUAL BENEFIT (Sec 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET Sec 23) TOTAL [9] In Section (Ha.\ MEAIHa. SoectfIc Normal Direct Norma' W PI 16, Conc 4 J.P. Roppel 0.00 0.00 - . - . . - . [10] UIS of Section [11] Sub-Total = $ [12] Cumulative Total = $ Cumulative CosUEq. Ha. carried UIS = $ 112.36 . . . , . . . J' !f . . . -D3- MunlciDal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Projeel Numb,er : UW03 5666 Section Number = M2 Project Neme : [1] CostlEq. Ha. from DIS = 112.36 Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 Dete : [21 Total Seclion Cost = $ 35,397 November 2005 [3] Specific Costs Total S ',cCosls = Remainder to Assess = 35.397 [4] Normal Oullel 75 % Normal Benefil and D~ect Outlel 25 % [51 Equlv't Area Drained = 86.65 Ha. @ S 306.38 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Outlel = 26.547 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Oullet = 8.849 [7] Direct Outlel 9.98 ha of the area in this Section uses 25% of its length = 3.77 ha of the area in this Section uses 50% of its length = 2.41 ha of the area in Ihis Seetion uses 75% of its len Ih = 764 578 554 1.896 Total of Direct Outlet = (8) Remaining for Normal Benefil = 6,953 SUMMARY TABLE U LOT I OWNER Ea. A~~;TUAL BENEFIT (See 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET (See 23) TOTAL [91 In Seellon (Ha.) EA (Ha. Scecific Normal Direel Normal WP116.Conc4 J.P. Roppel 10.00 10.00 - 6,953 - 1.424 1,124 9,501 E PI 16, Cone 4 S. Voisin 3.04 3.04 - - - 233 342 574 E PI 16, Cone 4 M.J. Voisin 3.12 3.12 - - - 239 351 590 [10] U/S of Section [111 Sub· Total = $ 10,665 [12] CumulatIve Total = $ 10,665 Cumulative CostlEq. Ha. carried U/S = S 418.74 ·04· Project Number : UW03 5666 MunlciDal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Section Number = [1] CosUEq. HI. from D/S = 418.74 Project Neme : Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 Dale: November 2005 [3J Specific Cosls [4] Normal Outlel 60 % Normal Benefil and Direct OuUel [2J Tolal S'!"tlon Cosl = $ 12,626 Total S eifie Costs = Remaind 10 Assess = [5J Equiv'l Area Drained = 40 % 75.46 Ha. @ $100.39 per Eq. Ha. for NJrmal OuUel = [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and D~eel Outlet = (7) Direct Outlet 7.96 ha of Ihe area In this Section uses 25% of its lenglh = 3.21 ha of Ihe area in this Section uses 50% of its lenglh = Total of Irect Outlel = [8] Remaining for No al Benefit = 12.626 . , . M3 . 7.575 5.050 200 161 361 . 4.689 SUMMARY TABLE LOT I OWNER EO. AREA ACTUAL BENEFIT (See 22\ Sect. 26 OUT ET (See 23\ TOTAL [91 In Section fHa.1 \REA IHa. SDecifle Normal Dire Normal N PI 16. Cone 4 J.P. Roppel 1.11 1.11 · 1,694 - 8 465 2,187 S P116. Conc4 Hydro One Networks Inc. #1 5:63 5.63 · 2.995 · 2 2 2,358 5,574 E PI 16. Cone 4 S. Voisin 1.79 1.79 · · · 5 750 794 E pt 16, Cone 4 M.J. Voisin 1.35 1.35 - · · 4 565 599 S PI 16, Cone 4 Hvdro One Networks Inc. #3 1.31 1.31 · · - 3 549 581 [10] U/S of Section , [11J ~ub - Tolal = $ 9,736 [12] Cumulalive Tolal = $ 20,401 Cumulallve CosVEq. Ha. carried U/S = $ 519.13 . : !Ø . . . . D5· Munlcloal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: Project Name : Section Number = M4 UW03 5666 [1] CostlEq. Ha. from DIS = 519.13 Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 .. 2005 Date: November 2005 [2] Total Section Cosl = $ 17.618 [3] Specific Costs Cost of structure at Station 0+931, plus administration assessed to S Pt. Lot 16, Cone. 4 (Hydro One Netwvorks Inc. #2) = 1.704 n Total Soeeific Costs = 1,704 Remainder to Assess = 15,913 [4] Normal Oullet 45 % Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet 55% [5] Equlv'l Area Drained = 71.56 Ha. @ $100.07 per Eq. Ha, for Normal Outlet = 7.161 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = 8,752 [7] Direct OuUel 2.37 ha of the area m this Section uses 25% of its length = 59 1.53 ha of the area in this Section uses 75% of lis length = 115 I Total of Direct Outlet = 174 [8] Remaining for Normal Benefit = 8.578 SUMMARY TABLE I LOT I OWNER EQ.AREA ACTUAL BENEFIT (See 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET (Sec 23) TOTAL [9] In Section rHa,) AREA tHa. Soecific Normal Direcl Normal E PI 16, Cone 4 S. Voisin 0.82 0.82 . 2.470 · 21 426 2.916 S PI 16, Cone 4 Hydro One Networks Inc. #2 1.55 1.55 1.704 1.736 · 39 805 4.283 S PI 16, Cone 4 HYdro One Networks Inc. #3 1.53 1.53 - 4.373 · 115 794 5.282 [10] UIS of Section [11] Sub - Total = S 12,481 [12] Cumulative Total = S 32,882 Cumulative CosUEq. Ha. carried UIS = $ 619.20 ·06· Project Number : MuniclDal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet UW03 5666 M5 Section mber = Project Name : Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 . 20Q5 [1J Cost/Eq. Ha. from DlS = 619.20 Date: November 2005 [2] Total Section Cost = $ 20,222 [3J Specific Costs Cost of structure at Station 1+228, plus administration assessed to S Pt Lot 17, Cone. 4 (Hydro One Networks In .j = 1,704 U Tolal Seeelfi< Costs = 1,704 Remainder to ssess = 18,518 [4J Normal OUtlet 30 % Normal Benefit and Direct OuOet 70 % , [5] Equlv' Area Drelned = 49.90 Ha. @ $111.33 per Eq. Ha. fer NormaliOullel = 5.555 12.963 (6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direct Outlet = [7 DlreelOullet ihå area In this Section uses 25% of its length = 603 I Total ef Di Oullet= 603 [8] Remaining for Normal enefil= 12.380 SUMMARY TABLE n LOT I OWNER EQ. AR~ ACTUAL BENEFIT (See 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET See 23\ TOTAL [9J In section tHa.! AREA tHa. SoeåflC Nonnal Direct , Normal N PI 17. Cene 3 M.B. Reppel 14.38 14.88 · 12.380 · 400 e.904 21._ 16. Gone 3 H. & D. Brown 7.28 7.28 · · · 203 , 4,508 4.710 S PI 17. Cone 4 Hvdro One Netwcrks lne. 0.00 0.00 1,704 · . f . 1.704 · [10J UlS of Seellon N PI 17. Cone 3 M,B. Reppel 1.60 1.60 · - · . 1.169 1.169 1a. Cone 3 D.N, Walper 32.28 32.28 · · · - 23.582 23.582 [11J Sub - Total = $ 52,829 [12J Cumulellv Total = $ 85,711 Cumulative CosUEq. Ha. can d UIS= $ 730.53 ... " . . . ¡ ~ . . . -07- Municioal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: UW03 5888 Section Number = M8 Project Name: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 [1J CostlEq. Ha. from DIS = 730.53 Dale: [21 Total Section CosI = $ 9,140 November 2005 [3] Speclflc Costs Total S ecIfIc Costs = Remainder 10 Assess = 9,140 [4] Normal Outlal 17 % Normal Benefit and Direct Ou"et 83 % [5] Equlv't Area Drained = 12.57 Ha. @ $123.81 per Eq. Ha. for Normal Oullel = 1.554 [6] Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direet Oullol = 7.586 [7] Dlreel Outlel The area in this Section uses 25% of its 5ength = 107 Total of Dlrecl OUtIel = 107 [e) Remaining for Normal Benefit = 7.479 SUMMARY TABLE I LOT OWNER EQ. AREA ACTUAL BENEFIT See 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET (See 23) TOTAL (9) In Section fHa.! AREA fHa. SDeclfie Normal Direct Nonnal N PI 17. Cone 3 M.B. Roppel 3.45 3.45 · 7.479 · 107 2.520 10.106 (10) UIS of Section S PI 17. Cone 3 D.N. Walper 5.72 5.72 · - · . 4.886 4,886 18, Cone 3 D.N. Walper 8.85 6.85 · . · - 5.851 5,851 (11) Sub - Total = $ 20,843 [121 Cumulative Total = $ 106,554 Cumulative CostlEq, Ha. carried UJS = $ 854.14 '" ... ::\ ~ ~ ", .. .. ~ <It 11 . . .. :I! 1 c 0 ~ l u ! '5 ~ æ ~ æ " z 1i .c ~ 0 !i C II) .. " ~f ..- II) 0 ~æ 1&.5 ", c I! ~ I~ ¡;¡ ¡¡¡ ~:E ,; z .. .5 E i! E c " .. '" en ,e- ~ '" .!o! ~ § I ::!Ii '" 1 1è ! ::> z æ " .. E ~ " z 1:; '¡j .. ~ 'ë' 'ë' a. a. 0 -D8- ~~'" '" '" om""'..... ">e. '" ", ~~;¡;~ "''''.... .... 0. t¡j ci.~ a; ~ "'~ ~ Z "'''' '" '" ~oo UJ ~.~ ;: '" ~~8~ j: :?.... 0"'''' 0 '" ~ -' -' < !!J"'''' ffire;g~ R~æ~ "'''' ~ _"11;,(0') ~-.:t;.C)) U1 . co. co. "'~ ~ ~~ .....S!...O) C> "':g'" "I: '(I")(O')v ~~~~ ~ ~"!~ rn.~~.~. r--cnc:o"l: ' :;:"!t'T'" II)"'ItLOT"" ";N~oi '" '" "'''''' :8"'''' ClC)MiN "'-~ 0'" '" ~j lttutCh (f1.~~ , ",,,, .. - ~ '" - "¡Ñ..,fa; ~ '" ¡¡ [!J. ~ "'~'" "''''''' "'.... ", .... ~(I")~ ¡¡¡g , , !:;~ ... .. - o. ~R 81"'''' '" , "'.... , , '" , 1ii .<1; ....'" '" ~I "'N Ñ.....·v ~ ¡¡ [!J. ... IL ;; ;; W , , , , ..... '" , Z W ~ '" UJ f~ .... In-"'" ~:g~g CClM(\ (I") :::~~ Nc<')"'..... ~"'.. ui"':Ñci "':«i\Ôm ~ - '" w i~~ ~~~ d -' -= "'II: iU 0 <W f ~ ...Z i >~ j H~ œ ~ - ~ ~ Z II: -¡; .s ~ 8 ~ .. ...8.~! < 0. .. C CD 0. ëõ -æ ::i 8"~ "is o 0 0 0&;:;: ::!Ii ~'õ> eH e oð~ZZ ::> Ii>~ -g,~ -g, -iw:e rr:I: :I: :i2cici <I) ........ ........ .. "'''' 8 ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ .. c c 5 - c c c c ... "'.88 o " 8 '"'88M 0 "'(,)'" g . . g -' '" . . ~~~ ..: ....~~ o ~ ~ 0 ~¡;:¡;: ä:éi:éi: ä: u__o r.óc-o.oS :ww UJUJUJ UJ .....Ztn.... . " .. .... "! ~ ~ .. .. . '" .... Ii .. '" ~ ", .. '" .. :h "\ '" .. ~ .. on .. "t :¡¡ .. ::; ~ ,.; .. . 0 & ~ .. t '" .. ~ ": ~ 0 ~ 11 .. ! œ ~ '" !! " E " u . ; .. . . i .c ~ o ~ _ê ew ~Iii ..::I i~ ~~ 'ii-¡ ãõ Jj ~ .. E E :0 II) . '" " o c o ] õ ~ " .0 E , z <0 <0 <0 '" ... .. S :::> ~ .0 E , z Ü .~ à: ;! .. '" '" . ,; % d- '!J .. 8 ;; c ¡¡: '" .. .. N .. N o Z c ë c ;; 0. 'ij .. , :; . " 2 .. ~ " z i ï? c. -D9- ~ '" .; .. ~ ON.... " '" om........ "''''0 N '" ~f.O.....(o "''''... " O. ....10(011) ... ci"¡ - M....· ~ w z "'''' N M _00 II' N" ¡;: '" , "'''''' "'N "''''0 5 0....· oc,jcô - N ~ -' -' < ;g~ø '" :¡¡ 000:...... ¡g ""a)N- ... "'N'" '" Lt)C7)<=:)a) Z ui ("If rN ~ò"':ci ~ " N"N " " OOH,ON ¡<¡¡g:g 0 .. .....MCOM g '" '" ,,:q~<::r: ,,' a5"': - - ""fN"OtC'l '" N ... "'_0> COM<C("II ( ;N'" ~g~~ ;; "'N MÑC\I "¡Ñ~a) -§ - N M 0 NZ ¡¡ !!J. ... "...- "'... w ;:- "''''N , ¡<¡:5 , Cl:!.M~ => U - o ,~ c ~~t:2 ¡¡¡ ;; <ONM '" ~.;f'V a; ~~ - " !!J. t- o: " <!; w , , 0 , z~ '" '" ~ 'ü - - '" i5;;; -",... C"')I.O~O COMNM :~"=I: (ØInCOO ("11M,........ tri"":NO ~có..noi ~;!; _"''' - '" _NM """ w dud U -'", .E.E.E.E 0 v.I If.I ø Vol "'w ." ~-c~~ <z c HH ...s j ..0 Q) (¡ Q)Q) ~ - ~ ~ õ; zzzz '" c ~ ~ ê ~ ~1i1i1i 2: c:!! ŒI Q.ëãCõ < &:~~ 0000 0&;:;: ::; HH. ::; a:>:-i oðcqZZ => -;(f. ~ J:J:J:J: :t~c:ici '" """ '<t'<T~'<T M:-') t- § u " u g g g - " C.C C C 0 (J0o ð 0 0 0 M88M -' uu uuuu <:i. . u :; -~~ ~-¿~~ § "':r": § 15:.-- ë:ä:ë:ä: u:::u c.c. .a..a.. . SWW 00(/)(/)"" ;eZ(J)~ .. " 11 8 i {:. '" c C N ~ " .0 C ~ o Z " ;!j M ... "!. - ~ .. N <0 ... '" '" .. " ~ '" ,,; ... .. ~ '" <Ô .. ~ õ; - Q._.!: ¡;f c.~ æ:i!g .0 0..>-; :iui :E "It:;::; ð" u " c c 88 uS - ~ ....~~ :9õõ -'-' 1(-- o..c. ;:ww SgS ."."." ~ ~ ~ -II.!!.!! c ~ ~ u:~ .. ~ '" on .. ~ ;! .; .. c '" .. ô " ~ëë ~ ~ ~ = :I :2 US 0.. .. " "" u "u n~ 0.0.0. .. 0.. = II:: ~g!. .. '" c " .; .. ¡¡~\? ~~~ ~H ~H "" " zzz i!! ~ i!! 060 E E E 'S.'S.'S. %%:I: .aSg ë1:ë " " . E E E 0.. .. .. .. 0 "" " .... 0 .... 0 «< ¡:; ¡! " .. J ~ .. " ] , u ::::.t:!.t? ;¡ ~ z ë " S .. , ~ ·D10- MunlclDal Drain Sectional Assessment Worksheet Project Number: Section NLmber = UW03 5666 Projeel Name: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 [1] CostlEq. Ha. from DIS = [2] Tolal Secllo" Cosl = $ S,046 . Dale: November 2005 ,..., ~ A1 0.00 [3] Specific Cosls II Total Soecifi Costs = - Remainder to ssess = 5,046 [4] Normal Oullel 85 % Normal Benefrt and Direct OuUel 15 % [5] Equlv't Area Drained = 32.28 Ha. @ $ 132.87 per Eq. Ha. for Norma 10uijel= 4,289 [61 Remaining for Normal Benefit and Direcl )ullel= 757 (7] Dlrecl Oullel The area in this Section uses 50% of its le09Il1 = 106 II Total of Direc Ouijel= 106 [8] Remaining for Normal I enefit= 651 SUMMARY TABLE I LOT I OWNER EQ. ARI:A ACTUAL BENEFIT (See 22) Sect. 26 OUTLET ee23) TOTAL [9] In Section fHa.) !\REA (Ha. SoecIfic Normal Dlreel Normal N PI 17, Cone 3 M.B. Roppel 1.60 1.60 . 651 . 106 . 757 ¡ [10] UIS of Seclion 18. Cone 3 D.N. Walper 32.28 32.28 . . . 4,289 4,289 [11] SUb~ Tolal = $ ¡ [12] Cumulallv¡' Tolal = $ i Cumulative CostlEq. Ha. carried UIS = $ i . 5,046 5,046 132.87 . , # · · åÎ_ GOe ~w ~I- 0111 ¡:~ ë~ GOE I- o "'z "'- =< ~H¡ - c ;! I! om 1301J ~.5 ~I'! ..e E .5 E,: ".c; III · ... ... ... '" ... o ~ :;) i¡¡ .Q " E E => .. Z Z Ü Ü (1) .!g, .§' e D. D. '" o :¡¡ . o ... Ó z c ë o ;¡ Q. U 'æ " ::; 8 2 iii .... z ~ (!) o o "!. ~ ~ ~ ~19 o ¡?.... ... « '" '" g .... e ffi'" ::; '" '" w c g¡ ïi! «0 c .¡¡¡ ::; i¡¡ :g.o ex: ~ z ì2í; ~;; '" o o ... ~ .. ... E ~ o z W ..J "'ex:. «w." ....zc ~ð.::! ex: « ::; ::; :;) '" Ö ..J J!! .. o -Dll- .... w Z $'~('\ r:oM ('t)O)C)(O\t) to-M,...,r-..O N--.;t· 0'.1.,..: ~~ ¡n ;¡: o ..J ..J « "'''' N<t "'N' ci r-.: ~ N'" ;:::'" CDQJtOOCO ~~~~~ cri,; uj gs~~~~ CON....."",...' ~-.."........It)-T""- ~ ~ I I I I ~~~~;; (0(\1...........,.... ~<q-...:IÔ...: ~ ~ 00 I()(C,........T'" 000 I . ~C';I~~~ ..............."";''';' - ~ ;: I()...... "'0 ·tDvOO ;:lri~cid ~ t.i U .E.E ~~ .n " " _ zz ~ .S ~ ~ g.·~·~oo ex:'õ>ee a;>"'i'R'R -,U)~:r::I: ~o;f'V'<;fV C U C) U 0 o c: c c: c: UOOOO üüüü cD . - - - "....cococor--- .....T"".......... ä:---- a.c..c.o.. 5:ww",,,, OJ'-o.f'o.-f'o., vl!).....Ll':I ..... ,... CD 1'-. M-.....- ~~~ ,""'co,.... ON-6 N N ONmo /'-MNv L().N.~N_ .................... ~ - o tOtO..... .....O)CON '......c.ocor-- '<;t. Cff -v. M '" '" ,.. 0> '" '" 1 'o..'N .¢ OCJ)(DN .....MCOM ,...mcov 'V. Ñ..:f ai '" N ~f6~~ .................... , I I . ................... COMN(f) ('\ (J)........... ,...:0;..00) ~ '" c ~-~.... e Q) Q) Q) [Q !S:"Q..9- 0.... c:io:s:;<: oðaizz ;¡;::Ec:i6 "'''' " " c c CO') 0 0 M u()ü(,,) C - - ~ o!;:!;:õ ü__ü . D. D. . ~zU)~ ~ ,.. '" CD, ~ ~ ... ... .... ,.. ... CD ... o o N ,.: '" ... o o "!. ~ ~ ~ ... CD .... o ..; ... ;1; '" ,,) o ~ ... ~ ... ..; o ~ " .. s o I- ~ "" .. :; e " (J '5 .. .c "ô of:w ~t; ..::I åi~ E_ .. = ~ « .c <> c t! ¡¡III c .S! '" ~~ II) ... ~Q ...5 E .. e:ii ,. II) '" '" .. on '" ~ ::> æ .c " E E ::0 ., Z Z ~ ¡¡ 'õ' 'ë' rr. 0.. '" <> lii: , <> '" .; z c: 'f! C õi a. .¡; .¡; ::0 :! ~ '" o o "!. ~ ~ ~ ... on o o '" j E ~ z s ~ .... W Z '" ~ o ::I « .... ~ C) ~11 ~~ « O)g .... !!! 15'" :! '" ø W c: 0)- ~ð c: ï;; ::¡¡ ~I z i1i~ !æ~ W -" ~;~ ....~j )-0 a: « ::¡¡ ::¡¡ ::> '" 9 -D12- oÑ....-.¡fC") ~~f2~~ £!..¡ ~ CXlGO N('I') N.qo T""CO tON' 'oo. Òr-..~ ~ ;¡¡g¡~"'2i r--. (\1('" ~ IJ') t6ÑC'i ~"'~gg NgsC,.....,.... """~ct5,..:~~ ~ I I I I ~~~~R "':flSr-:r~~ ~ 00 "'~r--~~ 0,"","" ~It}lr-..r--. T"''r"'....''7'''7 ~~ :::~~~8 :::Lri~cici ~ ó Ó £.5 g¡g¡ H zz ! .5 ~ :g a. c.!:!2 0 0 o'ü; 0 a:::·6> 0 0 o::>:"i-g,-g, -;(f.I:ëJ:::r: ~"It"¢'''<t~ .3 ¡,¡ g g g õ 000 ()()()() ~ r£rrict$.....- T"".............. [---- a:. a.. a. a. SLLlW"'''' 0.....,...,.... vll)T""tl) .........<0"'" ri"": ...: ~2~ 'r-(ó", cicici '" '" ONo:.O ¡""MNv '''IN..~C''{ '1"",........... ~ ~ o"'~~ ~O> '" r--", "- "¡ri-r:iM '" '" I;; æ I..... 'N .¡ OO'JtON ....(I")ooM ,...œco..q "¡Ñv·oi '" '" Lõ~;1;:g ........T""..... I , I , ................. OOMNM (\10),........ ~a)L()a) ~ '" c: ~õi"æ .c,ã.o.. a:J a. ëü. ëõ cil2ss cðccizz :i:!cici "'''' " " c: c: "" 0 0 M (,)Ü(.)o S /'00- r-: 8 ü::u . a. a.. . ~zU)~ ~ .. "- on "'. ~ ~ ... . '" ... r-- Ñ '" ... '2 '2:22 :!!2~ . g-; '!!Í.~ ...... " " c: c: o 0 ()() ctiw ~~ o <> '" ,.: '" ... o ¡¡¡ ..: ~ ~ ŠŠ ã:1i: ww SS ~~ 0- c: ê gg .. '" ... o oñ ... -- ëë ~ ~ U on on on on ., .. ~~ 0.0. on on 11 !iì!&¡: ó d ..5.5 . ... on on .s; o ~ ... ~ '" ..; <> ~ II co co zz co " c: c: 00 e e -g,-g, :J::J: SS 1:1: n on on ~ iß on on ~~ II on ! ~ ,. :; E " o ~â . - ,;1 ,~, · · · ~ BURNSiDE Appendix E Structure and Working Space Detail Sheets > .. . . . · ,T'· ,~ . · · ·E1· STRUCTURE DET~LS FOR: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 .. 2005 DATE:Nov~ber2005 MUNICIPALrrY: Kincardine PROJECT: UW03 5666 MINlIIDIiI APPR!rX. APPROX. STATION TYPE SIZE DEPTH ELEV'N OUTLET INLET COMMENTS INSIOE with sum" OF TOP MAIN DRAIN 0+931 JB 900 x 1200 2,3 55.5 W 525 COT E 525 COT Set on ex. tile at Jot 16, Cone 4 mld-bt line. x115mm TBC TBC Elevation TBC Elevation Tee Contractor to COf1firm aR dImensions prior to ordering box. 1+228 JB 900 x 1200 2.5 56 W 525 COT E 525 CDT Set on ex. tile at Cone. 3/4 Ine. x115mm TBC TBC Elevation TBC Elevation Tee Contractor to confirm aI dimensions prior to ordering box. TBC = To Be Confirmed by Conlrac!or. on site. prior to ordering !he structure. A10IY VARIATION FROM THE ELEVATIONS A10ID DIMENSIONS OF THESE STRUCTURES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. STRUCTURES NOT MA10IUFACTURED AS SPECIFIED MAY BE REJECTED FOR USE ON-SITE A10ID SHAlL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NOTES: (1) All structures shall have a minimum sump of 300rnm unless otherwise noted. (2) All catch basins shall have birdcage grates to suil and riprap for 1 m around structure. (3) Provide posts and markers ror ALL structures. (4) All grates and covers musl be fastened to the structure in an approved manner. (5) All structures shall have plugged inlets In !hose sides nol utilized by the drain 200 mm in diameler and 0.10 m above the oullel, unless otherwise noted. All plugged inlets (knock-ou!$) must be Identified on the inside of Ihe structure, In an approved manner. (6) All connections made to structures musl be made using rigid pipe which musl span from the structure to undisturbed nallve soil. -E2· WORKING SPACE FOR: Bruce Municipal Drain No. 20 - 2005 DATE: November 2005 MUNICIPALITY: Kincardine PROJECT: UW03 5666 STATION MAXIMUM COMMENTS WIDTH 1m) MAIN DRAIN 0+000100+010 10 Working space around existing oullel pipe. To mid Lol 16 4 For access from Sideroad along Hydro One access lane 10 IT Id Lot 16. To 0+931 4 For access from Hydro One lane to location of new junction ~ox al 0+931 (along edge of field on east side of Lol 16 mid~ot iine). 0+926 to 0+936 10 Working.space around new Junclion box at Sla. 0+931. To Lol 17 4 For access from mid Lot 16 along Hydro One access lane 10 0117. 1 +223 10 1 +233 10 Working space around new junction box al 1 +228. NOTES: (1) The enginee~s approval MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE exceeding Ihe maximum widths Indicated here; otherwise, the Contractor shall be responsible for damages beyond Ihese widths. (2) Access 10 Ihe working space shall be from public roads, farm lanes, or as specified. All routes musl be approved by Ihe landowners and the engineer prior 10 conslruction. .. .. ..... . . . ,-" .,!, ",' " - . . . . (bBURNsiDE .1 Appendix F Drawings - .. ik J < . . . '- -~ UW03 5666 - "" . J:\.: . , · · · 1:10,000 PLAN BRUCE MUNICIPAL DRAIN NO. 20 MUNICIPAUTY OF KINCARDINE ..1__"'WI.._þ....'~""¡oIO"\~...·w;;<G(,.'" ,_ !~,.! ~ -,~.. '.. II'i ~Jf·II ' _ ....,.-.... ,,- """ ,,~ NOVEMBER ?005 ~ BURNSiDE - . " ~ , . . . . . ~ .... '" '" . " N I~ i !:5 '" '" '" '" '" '" " ,j ,.. . , ~~~~¡ , "'-- ILl ~g - ~ j:~ ,.¡ ¡ '- jE l§ ~~~~~ ..;: I' , . - " ~¡5 ~ :; it i ~ ..I i 0 if ~~!~~ ~: c:o co '" · « 2;'" ~@ - '" E "'8ío~8 I . ,,,, '" "'15 (' ~ ~ !Ie: " ~t;; z+ ~ g§ _0 ~ - ~ "'!;g ",« ~6 Q ~E ~a - ~~ '" .. ¡¡; 0" §i!o n : ~~~ ZN N úH-(fI " · - ::.:~o~ <... :!! <"'!ij! 0 ~'" ::!~ , !1í~...... Q.o""': _0 ... o '" ~a.. ~ ~C1.m " :; "'''' "'<'" B - 23;.:~J s:,tñ:M. ~~~~ "t . ffiL z"~ ;=z~~ ~z> ~ 1.LJ2::;)~ ~~:¡j ~~:¡j ~ aJCHJ..... CO~_I.&J ~~i :9. · ! ~ åS~ ~ ~ , 0 I .. z 0 Q ~ .. a"' ~ ~~ ¡; B~ -L , - , L68+1 Vd ~ . I :> -\ i ¡; r ' -, Lt8H ¡ , ~.~ OOBH , " '- --" \ , ....Ed ~ ë. ... L \ \ ..,~o ! . r... o. u ~ "'0 i ! I~~ u (000+0'1') j ~ "'-- "- -- S~9+~ 'It I-CINV~e i u ¡¡¡ . , - . ~ -~ E - . u cä9* ~ A ~ ~ § § .. , ~~ , i ~ ... ::i~..... 00;+ ~ I ~ \., ,- ~ = ~ " I 50 ~ . § .. ,¡ - >' ¡¡¡... u u oB g ã ... ~ 13""1 ¡ · u ~ ~ ~~ 0 IU '7 \ ~ t '-.... '- ~~~+I ! '" ~ L....='- stt+L v. ;: ~ i ~ 9fU+1 v. I 9 11. J! ~ ¡ I " - 0 ... ~;¡ " B , ~ vf · -f- ) E SiDO+! v. o I E U~ 1;j ~ -f- n · Lt8+0 v. ~ \ ~ 006+0 , ¡ .., - I- ~ 6LL+O v. i -~ ~ ~ , - ~ I ~ ..- T tsSJ+o 0.,. ! ~iS ( i ~.5 " \I 009+0 I g" "- ~ I . 0 ! " u f' /'7' ~ 0 I ~L ... ~",:! J <-- ð 8 -~ · .... ~i Øo E a:9~ ./ u A .....- . 0 ~ ~ '" .. -c: 0 , 001:+0 , . '" ~ 0 ~ I ~ .............. , '" I - ,g .., Z ~ ./ o ~ <1 ~ ~ . :> ~ I 0" JOn.. I ! 000+0 .:K)¡.u.~no.:l ! I , ., .... :g. '" "' " N ¡¡; 0 'ÐNHJ 'dJS30 I '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ! , - .., It¡. I -' < , . . . , .....__u. W .- !I~ ~. '" .. ... :8 "' ... '" z "' '" '" "' '" '" 'II ~I'J ~ -' . II' M ,r ~ <~~~qi h . i I' <rJ , i!' "'_ 2 !I§ U~!}!s}S ''- r-- 5 ~~ ð 0 zz Ii i I ,I . . g: ¡~U~ ' ¡:Q ° '" p>'" -- ë§ ~ 15'" ~ ilQI '" ~i5 ~'" m º ~ II "0 '" ~t=i z+ z ~ ~ -0 5 ,I -- 28 <:. "~ ,,< -;!; . ~~ « co .:~ -- ð;! ¡¡; '" ~~~ ON !i,!- tiP-en ~~ / æ~.~ ~ <~~ -- ='~ -,'" .. ~. !!sO'" <~a) "!' ~'" "'<::! ~Q. C; z '" .., - 5" J! ~t;;! "~'" ï.~~ ~§i z.....J~ !;tz~~ ..."'" ii5d ~~;t~ ¡¡¡êd como..... "'",J. ~-I') Q~N 9 I I -r- -, - rç ~ +ov 1/d 1/,; " Ot~+O\l' ì . o~ ~+ov I \ oo~+ov I .. i " - I D .., ~ " " ¡~~ .. I . E 080+0"" "N ~ ;:¡ .., al9~ \ . :i~- ~ '" < \ .. z ~ 090+0V ~ " I w ) , I otO+O'o' ! / OZO+OV . , - (0<9+') I ooo+OV Nl'tijQ NIV" I , I '" .. ... .. '" ... .., N 'ONH~ '<1:)530 '" "' '" '" '" '" "' " . . - - / >, - - "'fi.-i -- "' , i: . . .